Topic

Aquamira Frontier Pro vs Frontier

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Sanad Toukhly BPL Member
PostedAug 10, 2009 at 1:24 pm

I would like to try the combination of chemical and mechanical filtration that I know some of you use. I currently use Chlorine tablets to treat questionable water sources.

I'm not sure which Aquamira filter would be better, the Frontier Pro or the Frontier. The Frontier Pro is 2 oz while the Frontier is 1 oz. Is the better performance of the Pro worth the weight penalty? Also, I do not want to use the filter as a gravity filter, is it a pain to do so? Also worth mentioning: I carry a 2 L platy and a 1 L wide mouth Aquafina bottle. Thanks.

-Sid

Curt Peterson BPL Member
PostedAug 12, 2009 at 6:30 am

Are you adding chemicals because you're concerned about viruses? Won't the Frontier Pro handle most US waters by itself?

EndoftheTrail BPL Member
PostedAug 12, 2009 at 7:15 pm

Curt:

Yeah, some waters out there are pristine and require no treatment before drinking… but if I feel I need to treat the water at all, I WOULD DEFINITELY NOT rely on the Frontier Pro by itself.

I am no water expert, but reading the literature and comparing filter specs, the quality filters have pore sizes of 0.2 to 0.3 micron — just small enough to be effective against bacteria.

The Frontier Pro filter size is 3.0 in size — or a whopping 10 times bigger than some bacteria! The Frontier Pro is really only effective against the bigger stuff like protozoa — and not against bacteria!

Think about it — any pool of water "rich enough" to sustain bigger/more complex organisms like protozoa will automatically be rich enough to support smaller, simpler life forms like bacteria.

To me, the Frontier Pro needs to be paired with something else — such as chlorine or chlorine dioxide or iodine or something — to be effective at all.

I pair my Frontier Pro with chlorine.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Loading...