Topic

Quilt and Tarp (No Bivy)

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 24 posts - 1 through 24 (of 24 total)
PostedAug 7, 2009 at 4:29 am

I am wondering if people think a bivy is necessary with a tarp. My wife and I prefer the quilt set up bu haven't used it with a tarp. In the past we used a 2.5lb backpacking tent and want to go even lighter with a tarp. What do you think?

-Bjorn

PostedAug 7, 2009 at 5:44 am

I used to not use much more protection than my pad and bag on a few occasions. I quit doing that when I discovered dozens upon dozens of tarantulas a hundred feet away one morning.

…then thare are those forearm long texas centipedes… Whew.

Creepy.

Steven Evans BPL Member
PostedAug 7, 2009 at 7:09 am

Hi Bjorn,
Your question very much depends on the size of tarp, the weather, and I guess what kind of giant insects you have in your area….

If your tarp is absolutely huge, then I guess you could go without a bivy for weather protection. FWIW, I've use a 55" x 110" tarp in the past and it required a bivy for rain protection during storms. My 48" X 96" MLD tarp is pretty tiny and definitely needs a bivy to keep the weather out.

HTH

Pedro Arvy BPL Member
PostedAug 7, 2009 at 7:31 am

A friend of mine became deaf in one ear when bitten inside his ear by an insect. I do live in Australia though.

PostedAug 7, 2009 at 8:27 am

Jesus…I have slept without a bivy under a tarp, but now I'm getting scared…

Anyone have an MLD superlight bivy for sale?? :-)

PostedAug 7, 2009 at 8:45 am

I usually sleep without the bivy under my tarp, but… foot-long centipedes? Tarantulas? Deafness? Screw that, I'm going with a fully enclosed tent!

In new england, the worst I've had is slugs on my stuff in the morning, so I find the bivy to be not always necessary. However, if I were camping in a windy area, or during peak bug season, I'd definitely want my bivy around.

PostedAug 7, 2009 at 8:49 am

Slugs are the worst I've ever had (that I know about) also, but have we just gotten lucky? I'm going to have to do some entomological research on New England ecosystems…

PostedAug 7, 2009 at 8:51 am

Hey Bjorn,

The bivy will protect you and your quilt from any spindrift, condensation, and other potentially wet conditions that can affect your quilts preformance; not to mention the bug insurance they provide. Bivy Sack's also do a great job of blocking winds that change direction throughout the night. If you decide to sleep without the bivy, use it as a ground cover under your tarp. Depending on your height, Oware makes the Dixon Double Bivy, which has plenty of room for 2 hikers 6'+. The Pertex Quantum top is extremly breatheable and does a great job of keeping us dry and warm. At 11 oz that's 5.5 oz per person!

Mark Ferwerda BPL Member
PostedAug 7, 2009 at 9:04 am

Hmmm, sounds like a lot of horror stories. I've used just a 5'x8 tarp for many years through storms and whatever else for many years. Never had a problem with bugs crawling on (or in) me. The worst problem I've had is with wind and that is usually because I chose a poor site to start with. Using a tarp requires being more selective of where you are going to sleep. I'd say leave behind the bivy. Part of the pleasure of using a tarp is the room you get underneath it. A bivy takes it away.
Mark

chris arvin BPL Member
PostedAug 7, 2009 at 9:23 am

This is why I can't get away from my hammock. It would be great to just take a tarp and groundsheet but I can't stand the thought of spiders crawling all over me while I sleep. With my hammock and up and away from all of those nasties and I've got plenty of room under the tarp.

My last night out, when I shined my light around camp I could see all of the white glistening dots on the leaf litter. I thought it was dew until I looked closer. It was SPIDER EYES!!!!

PostedAug 7, 2009 at 9:57 am

That's it. I am never going to leave Colorado :-)

I have never had a problem with bugs sleeping under only a tarp with out any bivy but I have pretty much spent most of my time in Colorado and the Sierra Nevada.

My tarp is 8×10 so it is plenty big to stay dry, even with two people. I am going to get a smaller tarp and go with some kind of bug netting/bivy so that I have more choices in setup/location etc…..

PostedAug 7, 2009 at 1:36 pm

I am doing a thru-hike of the PCT beginning in April. Ray Jardine has a NetTent that attaches to the RayWay Tarp that I think I would purchase for the Oregon and Washington Sections were bugs are typically a problem. I've slept outside with the critters and crawlers so many times I don't worry about them much.

The thing I am really wondering is if people get a lot of rain blowing under their tarp. Anyone using a RayWay Tarp kit?

-Bjorn

Peter Barron BPL Member
PostedAug 7, 2009 at 3:53 pm

100% of the time I camp there is a super bug (spider, mosqito, midges and others) problem no matter what season. 20% of the time we see snakes (pythons to elapids – most people don't die from their bites but you can haemorrhage from every orifice before anti-venene is given). And so I could never understand how anyone could ever sleep without some sort of bug/snake protection. I envied the US for lack of these. Nice to know that at least in some states you share our 'reservations' of an open camp.

Mark Ferwerda BPL Member
PostedAug 9, 2009 at 6:45 am

I've have made 2 Ray-Way tarps. One I used his design straight from his book. The second one I made I used a catenary cut for the ridgeline but in practice this did pan out well. I saved a little bit on weight but lost a bit of headroom when the side lifters are used. It's a nice design and the "beaks" add a bit of protection when raining. I also bought and made his net-tent. I've only used it once. Works well also but you lose a bit of room.
Mark

PostedAug 9, 2009 at 6:53 am

Chris makes a good point on the benefits of a hammock to eliminate bug problems at night….

Taking it a step further, given that a hammock can be hung in under a minute with no knot strap and tri-glides or buckle devices, there really is no reason to be sitting on the ground at all…. We use our hammocks at lunch and occasional long breaks…The benefits of several days without dirty knees and a dirty butt are much cleaner, healthier, and much more comfortable camp/hike experiance.

Pan

John S. BPL Member
PostedAug 9, 2009 at 8:54 am

That's some major "spin" going on in that last sentence Mr. Jacksrbetter ; ).

quote from above…
"The benefits of several days without dirty knees and a dirty butt are much cleaner, healthier, and much more comfortable camp/hike experiance."

todd BPL Member
PostedAug 9, 2009 at 1:55 pm

No spin.

Jack always discloses his professional affiliation by his avatar, or in his posts.

His preference for hammocks are what got him started in the business.

PostedAug 9, 2009 at 1:58 pm

Hammocks are useless above treeline. Any ground shelter / cover is infinitely more versatile in all situations.

PostedAug 9, 2009 at 2:30 pm

"Hammocks are useless above treeline. Any ground shelter / cover is infinitely more versatile in all situations"

That's a bit of an exageration. I can imagine if the only campsite you could find was steep, with a torrent of water running through it, and tress too close together and no flat ground to pitch a tent, then you might be happy to have a hammock.

PostedAug 9, 2009 at 3:16 pm

I camp above treeline almost always. ABOVE treeline.

No trees.

Why would I camp in a 'river'? You assume that one could not make a better choice of campsite.

PostedAug 9, 2009 at 3:56 pm

I also aim to camp above treeline or in open valleys. I was merely speculating that some people end up in situations (like on the AT??) where that is either not an option, or due to poor route planning you accidentally don't make your destination. Others like hammocks enough that they will seek out trees specifically so they can hang from them. To each his own.

PostedAug 9, 2009 at 4:34 pm

Ah, okay. In a situation of emergency.

My original point was simply that with a ground shelter I believe there would be more versatility than a hammock. Agreed HYOH.

Preston Patton BPL Member
PostedAug 13, 2009 at 9:44 pm

Referring back to what Pedro said about having a friend go deaf from being bitten in the ear by an insect: I find it hard to apply the same standards of wildlife and insects used in Australia anywhere else in the world! ;)

Because:
1) If Australia has a poisonous animal or bug, it's the most poisonous in the world, and
2) The Australians' very nonchalant acceptance of point # 1.

I mean, really, deadly jelly fish of all things…?

Preston

Viewing 24 posts - 1 through 24 (of 24 total)
Loading...