Topic

Rain covers or liners?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
PostedMar 16, 2009 at 4:21 pm

I know there have been threads like this for years, and threads with this same topic will likely continue to plague gear discussion boards for years to come… But! There have been some recently introduced products in this category and perhaps some people here have tried them out for a while and changed their opinions on this subject.

In my thinking, there are three categories for ultralight pack rain protection. Here's my thoughts on it…

Pack liners (exuded plastic)
pro: garbage bags are cheap to buy in bulk; highly economical
pro: fully waterproof when new
pro: very light
con: they easily tear and develop small holes when hard things are packed and unpacked from them; either you pack a spare liner for when this happens (extra weight) or you deal with the holes (less water resistant)
con: pack liners make packing a backpack a little more of a chore

Pack liners (silnylon)
pro: can be closed up like a dry bag
pro: some versions come with an eVENT patch to let you purge the air out
pro: strong fabric that can't get a hole from having your fuel canister packed too tightly inside of it like a garbage bag can
con: may not be waterproof underwater; like any silnylon, it has a low hydrostatic head
con: a bit heavy compared to other options
con: expensive

Pack covers
pro: can be deployed only when needed; things inside backpack can be accessed normally until then
pro: reasonably light–the cuben versions are extremely light
pro: most are reasonably priced…
con: …but the lighter ones are a bit more expensive
con: doesn't cover *entire* pack, only the top, sides, bottom and front; rain could possibly get in through the back
con: no protection from unexpected dunking
con: although silnylon tends to be fairly strong, having your rain layer exposed (rather than inside your pack) puts it at risk for damage from rocks/sticks/other sharp objects.

Three products that seem to me to be at the top of their class are:
Granite Gear "airvent reduction drybloc" – I have one of these and at 2 ounces for a strong, purgable dry bag, it's the perfect waterproofing on small volume, ultralight trips for a 20 degree quilt and minimal clothes.
Zpacks cuben fiber pack cover – Don't have one of these yet, but a 1 ounce pack cover looks really appealing. Probably going to pick one up.
Gossamer Gear/Backpacking Light polyethelyne pack liners – I think these are the same product… so far it's the lightest exuded pack liner I could find, though it's a bit more expensive than buying 25 compactor bags…
Compactor bags – can't go wrong here. They are cheap, widely available and dependable… unless you get a hole.

What are everyone's thoughts on this subject? Which type of pack rain protection do you prefer and why?

EndoftheTrail BPL Member
PostedMar 16, 2009 at 5:29 pm

Liners vs. covers — there will never be "one right answer".

I think first and foremost — you have to look at how YOU pack — and how much you might be willing to adapt (if at all). Are you comfy with dropping most everything into one big hole? Then a liner makes sense. OTOH, if you are into organizing — i.e. separate sleeping bag compartment, multiple outside pockets, bungee cords, daisy chains, etc. — then you'll likely be happier with a cover.

Secondarily, you should consider the design and fabric of the pack itself. Pack covers will never provide 100% protection — only a liner twisted shut can do that. OTOH, if your pack is made with beefy and old-fashioned pack cloth that absorbs a ton of water, then maybe a cover is the way to go.

If fording streams, definitely a liner. A liner twisted shut with the end pointing downward and with the pack closed and cinched tight will be rainproof. But if canoeing or fording streams, you may want to rubber band the end tight for added waterproofness.

Now, focusing on liners… silnylon liners vs. good ol' garbage bags? I would go for the 2mm contractor bags (note the comparison that many so-called heavy duty yard bags come in 0.9mm or less than half of contractor bags). IMO, with just a bit of common sense care — contractor bags are very tear and abrasion resistant. Any object sharp enough to puncture the bag will be sharp enough to damage your backpack too (hence common sense care). Silnylon may be a tad lighter for the same tear strength, but they are just as weak in the puncture department.

PostedMar 16, 2009 at 6:36 pm

It depends a lot on your hiking terrain and climate. I often have to ford rivers, and wouldn't trust my gear to just a pack cover. Also, most pack covers (at least the lighter ones) aren't tough enough to stand up to off trail abuse. And pack covers are really unacceptable if you need to access the contents of your pack during a deluge. So I go with a totally bombproof liner for my 'must stay dry' gear, and put everything else on top of that. YMMV.

Roleigh Martin BPL Member
PostedMar 16, 2009 at 7:09 pm

Both, I have a Zpacks 1.2 oz pack cover and for my down insulation material (sleeping bag and jacket) the Granite Gear Dryvents Drybloc, total weight is 2.9 oz for both combined.

PostedMar 16, 2009 at 8:26 pm

i agree with lynn, i have the granite gear drysack you refered to for my down bag. that way everything else is still accessable. i have not had to test the drysack luckily, but the quality is very good.

PostedMar 16, 2009 at 8:41 pm

I prefer liners. Covers keep me from reaching my easy-reach side pockets, and can get caught on brush. Quality liners can also be sealed up with some air trapped inside, making a pack more bouyant for use while paddling.

Mary D BPL Member
PostedMar 16, 2009 at 10:26 pm

Pack covers are nice to keep the outside of your pack dry during a shower. However, during prolonged rains the water runs down your back (where the pack cover isn't) and soaks into the pack. Pack covers are also useless in case of immersion. I know I'm not the only hiker around who has fallen while fording a stream! I have regularly used a pack cover only because my pack is part of my pillow so it's nice to have the outside surface dry.

For quite a few years I've used 2-mil trash compactor bags as pack liners. (Watch out–some brands, especially Walmart's, are perfumed!) They are certainly the least expensive solution.

It appears that lots of folks just rely on stuff sacks. However, they are not waterproof (take one into the shower, and you'll quickly see that the closure lets lots of water in). You can supplement stuff sacks with mylar turkey roasting bags (from the supermarket). Some just use the mylar bags. However, if you squish the roasting bag too hard, the seam may explode. And the combination of stuff sack plus mylar bag is as heavy as a lightweight dry bag.

Last spring I got tired of shoving small items down into the trash compactor bag only to have them pop right back out again thanks to the slippery surface. I went to REI looking for dry bags, but most of them are at least twice as heavy as a stuff sack. However, I did buy a small Sea-to-Summit Ultra-Sil dry bag for my first aid/essentials kit. These bags have had a bad rep in the past because they have leaked water through the fabric. However, this bag and the subsequent ones I bought passed the "turn inside out and fill with tap water in the bathtub" test–no leakage at all. (Obviously S-to-S has made considerable improvements in its product!) I therefore bought two more Sea-to-Summit Ultra Sil Dry Bags–one for my sleeping bag and sleeping clothes and the second (smaller) for my insulating outerwear. I carefully tested both bags in the bathtub before using them to be sure, and they definitely do keep the water out. These dry bags are no heavier than a silnylon stuff sack plus turkey bag, and the extra weight over the weight of a stuff sack for the two Sea-to-Summit bags is about the weight of the trash compactor bag.

These dry bags were inadvertently well-tested during my above mentioned dip in the stream last summer, and everything inside stayed dry. Since it was raining (it rained constantly for four days on that trip) and I was 2 days' hike from the trailhead, I was very glad that the dry bags worked!

So I've ditched the trash compactor bag/pack liner and use the dry bags for my critical gear (sleeping bag and clothing). I may also ditch the pack cover–I will try this out during short trips this spring. I too have been eyeing the Z-Packs cuben fiber pack cover as it is several ounces lighter than my current Integral Designs pack cover.

Roger Caffin BPL Member
PostedMar 16, 2009 at 11:28 pm

Poncho over me and my pack. No water down the back of the pack this way.
Waterproof pack material (XPac from Dim Poly)
Silnylon stuff sacks
PE plastic bags inside important stuff sacks (you can buy them in bulk, or pinch them from the fruit shop, or use freezer bags).

Two months wet weather in France in 2007. All gear stayed dry.

Mind you, for swimming rivers in fine weather, I do use a garbage bag pack liner as well. Paranoia… and dry.

It's not hard.

Cheers

PostedMar 17, 2009 at 1:43 pm

I forgot about ponchos. That would get around the standard pack cover's partial coverage problem…

EndoftheTrail BPL Member
PostedMar 17, 2009 at 4:02 pm

Ponchos can flap in the winds. And they can get punctured more easily than a liner nicely residing inside your pack.

I use a contractor's bag as a liner and I am completely happy with its performance — having hiked for hours in hard rain and suffered a good river dunking. However, as I alluded to above, it does mean packing a certain way. For me, everything except the stuff I need during the day go inside the liner and stay inside. Stuff that I need reside in my pack's side, front, and hipbelt pockets.

Alas, no solution is perfect… YMMV.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Loading...