Topic

Sleeping Bag Baffle Direction


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Make Your Own Gear Sleeping Bag Baffle Direction

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1233960
    Greg Mihalik
    Spectator

    @greg23

    Locale: Colorado

    Just wondering why baffles run Across the body versus head to foot.

    It seems that for a quilt, head to foot baffles would provide a better seal at the pad than would cross-body baffles.

    They might require a tricky mid-body cross baffle, but other than that, why not?

    What is the history, logic, propensity… behind our current cross-body norm?

    #1477003
    Roger Caffin
    BPL Member

    @rcaffin

    Locale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe

    With a full-length tube it would be too easy for all the down to migrate to the ends, leaving the middle bereft. Cold …

    Cheers

    #1477039
    Greg Mihalik
    Spectator

    @greg23

    Locale: Colorado

    Roger,
    My thoughts exactly.

    Except – if you 'magically' put a cross baffle in at, say the hip region, then each tube would then be shorter than a typical circumferential tube – 40" versus 55" for a quilt.

    So it seems like a better arrangement, IF you can get that cross baffle in place.

    The cross baffle certainly makes mass production harder, but posted elsewhere is the comment that Golite does this in their Ultra 20's.

    But then I have to ask 'Since it is not done this way, what Are the reasons?' and hence this post.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...