Topic
Become a member to post in the forums.
Why does the above torso length pad have an R value of 2.27 and the old Mt Washington have an R value of 3.2?
http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/00077.html
The Prolite 3 long and short have the same R value of 2.3. I realize those are not necessarily comparable between manufacturers.
John writes:
>> Why does the above torso length pad have an R value of 2.27 and the old Mt Washington have an R value of 3.2?
John, the Mt. Washington pad also had a R2.27 value. I still have the packaging that came with mine and it’s printed on there.
Cheers,
-Mike
Okay, that link must have a typo. Thanks.
Become a member to post in the forums.
New Ultralight GearSee the latest releases in ultralight cottage-brand gear from small makers.
© Beartooth Media Group Inc.
Loading...
