Topic

The best thing for staying dryer in snow camping

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Richard Nisley BPL Member
PostedDec 18, 2008 at 9:08 pm

The original thread covered a lot of topics. This new thread is just intended to just focus on why the Chouinard, used as an inner bag, was so effective at preventing wetting of the down bag in winter conditions. Mike Clelland, Dewey Riesterer, and Mike Martin all provided valuable insights that aided me in my hypothesis which is: The Chouinard acted as a buffered vapor barrier primarily because of the coating on the insulation used.

The insulation that sounded like Thermolite was probably Thermore T37. It has a coating on the insulation that transitions to a vapor barrier between 50F and ~0F. The reason that insulation was so warm for its thickness is that it has a formulation very similar to Thinsulate without the coating.

Thermore T37 was introduced to the marketplace in 1985. Production around the world was handled through a web of joint ventures and technology licensing arrangements, which include Hobbs Bonded Fibers, Du Pont Co. and Mitsui & Co. and ties with companies in Bangkok, Korea and Bangladesh. Du Pont Co owns the Thermolite trade mark and they have used this trademark for the Thermore product during this period. Thermore now has about 100 different types of insulations.

Both Thermore T37 and Thinsulate used very thin olefin rather than polyester for the fine fibers. The thinnest version of each is about 100 g/m2, is .3” thick, and an R-Value of 1.14. The T37 coating was primarily intended to act like the Primaloft scrim so that it could be used with fabrics that weren’t down proof. It is comprised of unique formulation porous cross-linked urethane that is calendared to be very thin. This thin coating has pores that close as the temperature drops and open as the temperature increases. When used in very cold weather it becomes the equivalent of a vapor barrier.

Silnylon in combination with Primaloft One for a buffer and added warmth will accomplish the same thing with less weight and more efficiency when wet. Any light synthetic quilt or bag inside a down bag will not work the same way.

Michael Martin BPL Member
PostedDec 18, 2008 at 9:46 pm

Hi Richard-

Thanks for creating the new thread. This is a fascinating topic!

Your hypothesis about the T37 acting as a VB would certainly explain the moisture protection that Mike C! experienced with it.

I have to wonder if the T37 would be cool enough inside a down bag to exhibit the VB effect, though. The innermost insulation would be at near body temp — say 85F, and assuming the Choinard bag had a thermal resistance of, say, 25% of the outer bag, and the ambient temp was, say, 10F, then the outermost portion of the T37 would be around 66F. Is that cold enough for the T37 to act as a VB?

Just speculation, but could it be the shell material of the inner bag, rather than the insulation that is inhibiting vapor transfer?

Best Regards,

-Mike

Richard Nisley BPL Member
PostedDec 19, 2008 at 7:28 am

Mike,

They changed the insulation cover coating formulation over the years. I am GUESSING that the early formulation allowed much less moisture transport than the face fabric even at the temperature inside the down bag. The primary objective of the insulation face covering was the elimination of down-proof fabrics, I GUESS that the fabric used with the bag was very porous.

Having said the above, your hypothesis may be the correct one. Let’s request that Mike C. or a surrogate test a winter down bag with and without a light Cocoon inner. This would allow us to determine if the added face fabrics alone will reduce the bag moisture appreciably.

Michael Martin BPL Member
PostedDec 19, 2008 at 8:31 am

>> Let’s request that Mike C. or a surrogate test a winter down bag with and without a light Cocoon inner.

Thanks, Richard.

Do you think that a Cocoon quilt will be "continuous" enough to function as a buffered VB? I wonder if drafts out the bottom of the quilt will allow moisture to bypass the Cocoon insulation/shell and migrate through the Down rather than escape through the head opening of the system.

btw, I have a hypothesis about why footboxes tend to experience more frost build up than the rest of a bag. The footbox is furthest away from the head opening, and may be "sealed off" from the head opening if the bag's insulation forms a partial gasket. So, a greater percentage of moisture from the feet needs to escape through the foot box insulation/shell than from the torso/head area closer to the head opening.

Cheers,

-Mike

Roger Caffin BPL Member
PostedDec 19, 2008 at 1:41 pm

> why footboxes tend to experience more frost build up than the rest of a bag.

Another reason may be that feet do sweat a fair bit, but there is not that much heat emitted down that end of the bag compared to the torso region. So the combination of high sweat and low heat allows more frost. ??

Cheers

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Loading...