Hey-
I think the most apt comparative description of Windstopper is that it's a stretched-out, thinner version of GTX.
You might or might not be aware that the Dryloft used for years in sleeping bags is one and the same as Windstopper. I've had a Dryloft bag ~15 years now, still in great shape. In insulated items such as down bags and parkas, I haven't found any significant contamination problems–none, really. But those shouldn't dramatically affect the waterproofness, either–more so the breathability. I also have a Dryloft/Windstopper down parka, roughly 8-10 years old, still in great shape, no problems with the shell.
Keep in mind that Windstopper is intended primarily for exactly that–stopping wind. By virtue of its not being waterproof it is inherently more breathable, which makes it particularly useful in down items (there's a reason we no longer use GTX in sleeping bags). Stopping the wind prevents convective heat loss, obviously. In conditions where I'm using a Windstopper-shelled garment or bag, it's cold enough that it's not raining, so absolute waterproofness isn't as important–or as desirable. For when it's intended for use, I've found WS to be quite adequate. Hope this helps.