Topic

Locating Ultralight Pack ?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
PostedNov 14, 2005 at 3:38 pm

Good evening everyone. New to the forum and I am in need of some help. Some time ago, in my endless surfing for lightweight gear, I saw a pack that was basically a stuff sack with shoulder straps. I recall it was very light; maybe even lighter than a G6. Can someone point me in the correct direction?

Thanks

PostedNov 14, 2005 at 4:26 pm

Thanks Paul. That is the one. Do you by chance know the physical dimensions of the pack? All of the retailers and IG list is the volume.

PostedNov 14, 2005 at 4:39 pm

Thanks Paul. That is the one. Do you by chance know the physical dimensions of the pack? All of the retailers and IG list is the volume.

PostedNov 14, 2005 at 4:40 pm

check out the reveiw on this site

Silicoat Backpack Reveiw

it looks like if you remove the hipbelt you can get the pack to weigh 3.5oz and if you replace the soulder straps you can get it to be even lighter, but if you are going to do that I recomend just buying a u.l. stuff sack and making your own pack

PostedNov 14, 2005 at 6:23 pm

Thanks for the link Ryan. It would seem that using a dry pack would be most effective.

My interest is building something inexpensive for this project. What is the best source for shoulder straps? Make your own (I dont have access to a sewing machine at this time), or sourcing shoulder straps from a poor defenseless donor pack? :)

PostedNov 15, 2005 at 1:14 am

Michael, sorry to be so long in getting back, was “off-line”. sorry, i don’t know the dimensions.

PostedNov 15, 2005 at 12:13 pm

you could just use some webbing straps, thats all integral designs used for the silicoat pack :-)

Dale Wambaugh BPL Member
PostedNov 15, 2005 at 1:47 pm

Here’s something that has intrigued me for a while– once you get below the ten pound mark, why not use a design more like a duffle or messenger bag– eliminating one strap completely? Ray Jardine wrote of carrying his pack on just one shoulder most of the time. It could open up other designs with the pack oriented horizontally rather than vertically.

Something I haven’t come across in the UL designs is a variation on the old bed roll: if you have all that fabric for a sleeping bag, why add the pack? A simple strap system with your goodies rolled up in the sleeping bag would be uber minimalist. With a poncho, it could go under the raingear to keep it dry.

PostedNov 15, 2005 at 2:28 pm

Thanks David; definately a viable option.

I also thought about taking the super thin straps off of a camelback “biker” model (not sure if this is still the model name) and adapt to my homemade pack. This would add to the overall cost though. I might have to stick with the thru-hiker straps or find a cheap donor pack.

Jim Colten BPL Member
PostedNov 15, 2005 at 2:38 pm

I doubt she said it quite like that but If the load is light enough you could always go Grandma Gatewood style:

Or back to Dale’s single strap idea … I’ve hiked many a mile with day hike stuff (first aid, rain gear, snack, navigation) packed in a medium sized old Caribou fanny pack carried “bandolier style” with the strap passing over one shoulder and under the other arm.

Not having access to a sewing machine, I think your lowest cost MYOG solution might be to buy a pre-made silnylon stuff sack (example: $12 for 12 liter size, $14 for 25 liter at golite) and then hand sew a single 1.25 inch strap down one side. Add a ladder buckle and you’re in business. good multi-use possibilities too.

Dale Wambaugh BPL Member
PostedNov 15, 2005 at 3:01 pm

Grandma Gatewood crossed my mind as I wrote the message. Talk about less is more.

I like to carry a fanny pack that way– I have too much belly and too little fanny– or I guess you could say I taper the wrong direction. I have an Ex Officio fanny pack that I picked up in a thrift store that is essentially a long tube with a zipper down the side. I carry all my essentials in that and it works well bandolier style. Packs, what packs? WE DON’T NEED NO STINKIN’ PACKS :)

PostedNov 15, 2005 at 3:04 pm

when sizing any of the available stuff sacks, is a 20″ x 10″ sack capable of holding a 20″ tall foam pad; ie accounting for wrap-around of the contents?

Or is this a length when the sack is empty/flat?

I never thought this was going to require so much research, LOL.

PostedNov 15, 2005 at 3:08 pm

it is probably flat. I bought a dry sack once for my sleeping bag with the right mesurements. I could fit the bag in but there was no space to roll it up so I ended up not being able to use it. if you want a sack for a pad then you will have to find one with a 25″ or 26″ length, good luck :-)>

PostedNov 16, 2005 at 3:00 pm

Doh! I bought some parts and pieces late last night. More options. If my homemade doesnt turn out well enough, I will definately look into the varieties listed in the last two posts.

Anything else out there not yet posted?

I wish I wasnt such a gear junky!!!

Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
Loading...