Topic

R value to Tempperature

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
PostedOct 6, 2008 at 8:30 am

I read all the threads on R value and the Torsolite, but I didn't really find what temp you could take it down to.

With a pack for the lower body what temp would you go down to on a torsolite?

I'm thinking I need to combine an extra pad for below freezing temps.

*** Mods: Being able to edit typos in the Subject line would be great. Only for notoriously bad mispellers like myself.

Jeremy G BPL Member
PostedOct 6, 2008 at 3:32 pm

I found this interesting article about sleeping pads in general a while back… it is geared towards hammock camping and I find that there is probably about a 15-20 degree difference as to insulating value between sleeping on the ground vs in a hammock, but everyone is different.

http://www.hammockcamping.com/Free%20Reports/DWombleFoamPads.htm

It will at least give you an idea as to how they compare with each other.

Richard Nisley BPL Member
PostedOct 6, 2008 at 4:26 pm

Jeremy,

Dave's work will give you a rough ball park for hammock use but, his foundation premise is erroneous. All closed cell foams DO NOT have the same thermal conductivity for the same thickness as the Link Rest. At least eight types of closed cell foam formulations are used in sleeping pads and they all have different thermal conductivity values for the same thickness.

Richard Nisley BPL Member
PostedOct 6, 2008 at 7:07 pm

Stuart,

The OEM manufacturer's R Value spec. on this pad is 3.5. I let mine self inflate, sealed the valve, and then tested its R Value. It tested 2.8 on my prototype thermal tester. The R Value would be higher at maximum inflation but, the comfort would be poor. I only did one test rather than average a series of tests to provide the most accurate results. A sleeping bag that provided this same level of insulation would have an Extreme rating of ~38F.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Loading...