First, following up on the suggestion to see what google has to say on the subject…I was able to find this fairly detailed article chock full of footnotes at:
http://www.bisphenol-a.org/human/epoxycan.html
To my untrained read of the conclusions….it appears that there is not a whole lot to worry about.
Second, on the heat subject, it appears that the FDA specs for evaluating this kind of stuff anticipates that the public will want to boil in these containers. Consequently the spec calls out evaluations to hold the test "food" at temp for two hours….at a variety of different temps including boiling and 250 degrees. Here is the spec I found:
http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/opa3pmnc.html
Third, I suspect these coatings are primarily targeted to minimize food/beverage contamination over time periods measured in years and shipping conditions that take it through various pressures, temperatures and loadings. Mostly folks will be just boiling water. But even if they were cooking in the cans, do you really think that the minimal contact food would have with a scratch exposing the underlying aluminum, for the short amount of time it takes to warm it up, will have any kind of effect? I'm not an expert here, but I really doubt it.
Fourth, aside from the various non-stick stuff…..are normal aluminum pots coated? If so or if not, how is that any different than the beer cans?
Ultimately….I'm no expert on any of this….so please feel free to blow holes in my observations. In the end, these cans go through more FDA scrutiny than I put to cleaning my personal pot after cooking in it…..an activity I'm going to worry much more about than the lining on the can.
My $.02….again….please let me know if I'm fundamentally missing something!
Rand :-)