Topic
Backpacking Light DIAD Pad
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Backpacking Light DIAD Pad
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Sep 4, 2008 at 9:41 am #1231010
I see that the material used for this pad is plastazote. How does it compare with the evazote material that Gossamer Gear uses?
Sep 4, 2008 at 3:18 pm #1450029Plastizote is lighter, less durable and cheaper than evazote. Correct me if wrong.
Sep 4, 2008 at 3:55 pm #1450038Evazote and Plastazote are both made by the same manufacturer and are very similar. There are varying grades of each foam and it is the grade that determines the materials density. It is the foams density that determines its weight and R value. If you remember any geometry then you'll remember that d=m/v where d=density, m=mass and v=volume.
Sep 4, 2008 at 5:53 pm #1450052Hi Sam
> If you remember any geometry then you'll remember that d=m*v where d=density, m=mass and v=volume.
Ah … D = M / V actually! Mass per unit volume.
Cheers
Sep 4, 2008 at 6:41 pm #1450063Quantitatively speaking, based on specs published at BPL and GG plus measurements on a 1/4" GG Thinlight I have:
- DIAD's plastazote density is 0.012 ounces/cubic inch
- DIAD's plastazote R-value per inch of thickness is 2.13
- ThinLight's evazote density is 0.013 ounces/cubic inch
- ThinLight's evazote R-value per inch of thickness is 3.6
- a 1/4 inch Thinlight cut to DIAD's size would weigh 2.4-2.8oz vs DIAD's 1.7-1.9oz
- The same ThinLight would provide .321-.375 R-value per ounce carried.
- The DIAD would provide .210-.235 R-value per ounce carried.
Qualitatively speaking:
- I'm not expecting to sleep well all night on either pad. Not having a DIAD I am unable to compare them for comfort but I'd expect the ThinLight to be marginally better.
- I've carried a 1/8" Thinlight for under legs in shoulder season and a handy sit/lie upon during breaks the last couple years. It's showing no sign of wear and I have not been careful with it.
- But I haven't used the 1/4 inch ThinLight yet and don't own a DIAD.
Seems to me the biggest factor in choosing would be how cold I expect the ground to be when I use it (ignoring the fact that I don't know about durability differences)
Sep 4, 2008 at 7:29 pm #1450068Just got back from a trip to Shinning Rock in wester Nc. Used the diad with a full sized 1|4 inch thinlight. I slept under a tarp with a BMW 60 quilt. I'm guessing the temp was in the high 40s to low 50s. I will say that I had the pads ontop of a nice patch of grass but all and all very comfy to sleep on. Also never felt cold from the ground.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.