Topic

Bear protection options above treeline…

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
PostedAug 20, 2008 at 5:59 am

Excuse me for my relative ignorance about this – I rarely hike in bear country.

I am going to the Wind Rivers this weekend and will be hiking from Green River Lakes along the Highline trail to Summit Lake, and then around Elbow Lake up to Titcomb Basin. From what I see in the pictures and on Google Earth, from Summit Lake to Titcomb Basin is largely above the treeline. (Someone correct me if I am wrong).

I was planning on using my MLD Bear Bag system (which I've never used before), but now that I realize I may be above treeline, what are my options? Am I stuck with a bear canister? That's what I've used before in the Winds and it is no fun lugging one of those around.

(Also, if bear canister is my only option, are there any models anyone would suggest? I will probably be packing with a Golite Pinnacle).

CW BPL Member
PostedAug 20, 2008 at 6:10 am

I think Ryan J just uses opsacks if he can't find trees. Pretty sure that's what the methods are for the WTS3 course as well.

David Noll BPL Member
PostedAug 20, 2008 at 7:56 am

Ryan,
Just got back from the Winds and Titcomb Basin area.We used an
ursack with an OP bag. I didn't really see that many decent hanging trees in the area.

PostedAug 20, 2008 at 8:00 am

Has anyone heard the status of the progress in getting this device approved? The video and specs sure make it an attractive, although pricey, option.

John S. BPL Member
PostedAug 20, 2008 at 8:18 am

March 2008: SIBBG evaluation complete. Palisade EST denied approval for use in SIBBG managed areas. Approval of the Palisade EST was denied based upon:

1)Palisade EST does not pass SIBBG Visual Inspection.

2)Potential for user error determined to be too great in Palisade EST

3)Safety issues with regard to human use.

Based on SIBBG protocol, the Palisade EST was denied approval without ever being tested by any captive or wild bears.

April 2008: IAGBC begins field test of Palisade EST.

May 2008: IAGBC field tests continue. Results: SUCCESSFUL DETERRENCE.

July 2008: Independent, 3rd Party testing in Central Idaho continues. Extensive Video Documentation collected, and beginning to be reviewed.

http://www.wilderness-solutions.com/faq.htm

PostedAug 20, 2008 at 8:49 am

Has anyone else gone into bear country just trusting OP sacks? I could double up. :)

Would I be stupid to do this?

PostedAug 20, 2008 at 9:22 am

At the risk of being chastised again for having views about traveling in bear country counter to those posted here, I’ll say that we have used the OP sack without our Ursacks when we hike here in Southeast Alaska. Most often we do drop them in the Ursack. This is as beary a country as you would find anywhere in the world. Below are the contents of my pack with an OP sack full of food.Backpack Contents for Chilkoot Trail

PostedAug 20, 2008 at 10:58 am

John,

Is the SIBGG decision final or will there be a reconsideration of its decision based on another agency's testing and approval?

PostedAug 20, 2008 at 12:05 pm

Good question Dave. This info came from the Wilderness Solutions website without further explanation. This seems like a dandy way of carrying effective food protection with an unreasonable weight penalty.

PostedAug 20, 2008 at 3:43 pm

I have had great success hanging my food off of large boulders or small cliffs in the winds. I personally wouldn’t use just a bag of any type, particularly in the winds where the bears that you will have problems with are habituated to human food. There are lots of good tall boulders in titcomb basin and around the elbow lake area. Beautiful country in there, have fun.

I hope the EST gets approved, it is an elegant solution. NOLS has been using electronic bear fences for quite a few years now, but they are not really all that light or practical unless in a larger group.

Link:
Bear fence video

PostedAug 21, 2008 at 12:06 pm

If I put my food in food in two OP sacks (one inside the other), would a bear really be able to smell anything? It seems like I could just hide the food sack in some bushes or under a little rock shelter and it would be fine. Am I missing something here?

PostedAug 21, 2008 at 5:48 pm

It's more about approved food storage than what the bear might, or might not smell IMO. OP sacks AFAIK are not approved for food storage by the USFS. Would a bear be able to smell your food? Hard saying not knowing. Bears have an incredible sense of smell. Many have had success with the option you are discussing. Would it end your trip if a bear did get your food? What if the bear decides to check out your shelter w/ you in it? Are you prepared to pay the fine if a USFS Ranger cites you for improper food storage? These are all questions you need to ask yourself. Even Ursacks are not an approved food storage container. I wish I had picks of the one we tested in W. Yellowstone, it hardly slowed the bear down. Ultimately, it is your call, we all choose the level of risk we are willing to expose our selves to. I choose to follow the food storage orders, and find it easy to do with hanging (even above tree line). YMMV.

PostedAug 21, 2008 at 6:23 pm

Ryan brings up an issue I find to be a moral one for me. How I store it in an unregulated area is my choice. But in regulated areas, I either follow the rules or I choose not to hike there. I never consider whether or not I might get "caught" and fined. I simply play life by the rules and if I don't like them I play somewhere else.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
Loading...