Topic

Larger, Breathable Stuff Sack for Down Bag?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
PostedAug 12, 2008 at 1:29 pm

After years of using the original Go Lite quilts, and years before that of synthetic fill bags, we're going back to down.

Since we have the space to use a larger stuff sack than the very small ones that came with the bags, I'm assuming that larger stuff sacks would be better since they then wouldn't compress the down as much.

And that, in combo with making sure that the larger stuff sacks are breathable (so any tiny bit of moisture still in there has a chance to escape while we hike), seems to be the best solution.

Any thoughts?

We're not worried about moisture from outside the stuff sacks because our packs never get wet on the inside where we keep the bags, hence we're not looking at the waterproof stuff sacks…

Thanks!

EndoftheTrail BPL Member
PostedAug 12, 2008 at 1:57 pm

Not that it will make an earth-shattering difference either way, but…

I too used to use a stuff sack with my down sleeping bag. I later experimented with packing the bag directly into my backpack — and found out what many others have before me — darn, it was actually so much easier, quicker and MORE space efficient leaving out the stuff sack entirely! Basically, instead of you wrestling with the bag into its stuff sack to make it smaller — the bag automatically "self compresses" as you pack all the other contents!

I line my backpack with a contractors bag for rain protection — but in your case where you are confident that rain won't reach in — then there's no reason to use a large, breathable sack either. Just pack the bag in first, and then pack everything else as normal. Give it a try.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Loading...