Topic

got pics of your ULA circuit / catalyst?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
PostedJul 24, 2008 at 10:06 pm

I've found quite a few photos of these packs around the web, but it's hard to judge the size when they are shown in isolation.

Does anyone have a pic which shows either of these packs next to a "standard" object of some sort? Even a person holding one up would be good, or a photo from the back of someone wearing it? I doubt anyone owns both these packs, but the two of them side by side would be very informative too.

From the specs it seems that there's not a whole lot of difference in volume in the main compartment (catalyst is 200 cu inches bigger). But the shape is a bit different (catalyst is wider). Most of the extra volume seems to come from bigger mesh pockets.

Anyway, if you have a pic I'd love to see it!

PostedJul 25, 2008 at 6:57 am

I originally purchased the Catalyst and ended up returning it for the Circuit because the Catalyst was simply too big for a multi-day trek. The packs are bigger than you think. I'm 6'6" and the Catalyst rose past my shoulder height fairly significantly. The Circuit has plenty of room. Sorry, I don't have pictures though.

PostedJul 25, 2008 at 10:53 am

Ashley,

Here is a link to a photo album with lots of pics of the ULA Circuit and the Conduit as well. No Catalyst packs but the photos might help you judge-

http://outdoors.webshots.com/album/563472583fqMZhn

This pic shows 4 ULA packs in comparison (L-R Conduit, Circuit, Conduit, Circuit). The Circuits are loaded with a lot of gear. The owners aren't really in the SUL crowd, so your gear is likely to be of less volume. My wife and I use the Conduits, and our gear loads are fairly small volume but not bare-bones SUL kits. Everyone is carrying about 4 days food-

http://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/2865758030090886177lKgPXO

This pic is a friend wearing his Circuit pack. He's about 5'9" tall and I think the pack is torso size Medium. Again, his gear isn't SUL, but I think his pack weight was around 35 lbs, including 1 man 3 season freestanding tent, 30 degree down bag (WM Megalite, I think), full cooking gear, lots of clothing (fleece, raingear, etc), 4 days food-

http://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/2695730840090886177aTaRBY

As for which pack to choose, unless you are carrying traditional bulky gear, lots of clothes, 2+ man tent, gallons of water, or 2 weeks food, I think the Circuit will probably suffice. Hope these help!

PostedJul 25, 2008 at 1:59 pm

HTMLman swoops to the rescue!

Edit- oops, Ben it looks like the first two links for my pics have the same web address. No matter, the link to the main gallery has all the pics in it…

PostedJul 26, 2008 at 2:39 am

Thanks guys, that's very helpful. Both packs appear to be a little bit bigger than I have been imagining. Certainly Russell's pics seem to suggest that a Circuit would fit the volume I've been looking for pretty well.

Of course, I made the noob mistake of buying a pack as my first item to replace. Quite a nice pack (GG nimbus meridian) but now that I've reduced the weight on a lot of my other gear I won't be needing the volume and load capacity.

Another question for the Circuit owners amongst you… the Circuit has a drawcord closure at the top, right? Does anyone know whether ULA used to make Circuits with rolltop (drybag) style closure? One of the BPL member reviews seems to suggest that they have a Circuit with a rolltop. I'd ask Brian myself but he's already disappeared off on his hiking trip. Drawcord closure isn't a deal-killer, but the rolltop would be a little more secure when I'm traveling (not so easy to reach into the top of the pack).

Thanks again to those who have posted (and thanks HTMLman!). If there are any more pics from others I'd still love to see them, and I'm sure it would be a useful resource for others. =-)

PostedJul 26, 2008 at 3:22 am

The other thing I was wondering is, are Large frame Circuits heavier than the 32oz listed on the website (they don't specify weights for each size). Somewhat surprisingly, Richard's backpackergeartest review has the measured weight of his Catalyst at spot on (or just under) 43 ounces once you subtract the optional components. That's pretty amazing because he has an XL framed pack with a large hipbelt. Surely then the smaller torso sizes would come in at under the weight in the specs… assuming the XL packs are actually bigger, with extra fabric etc. Curious…

Tad Englund BPL Member
PostedJul 26, 2008 at 10:09 am

Russell, good pictures. Just wondering was this the knee brace brigade?

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
Loading...