Topic

Looking for an economical and efficient pot

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
PostedJul 6, 2008 at 6:40 am

I'm looking to upgrade my current cooking system and have a few specific criteria for what I want my new pot to do. First, let me explain my current setup. I use a 24 oz stainless pot that weighs right over 6 oz with an MSR PocketRocket and I've just bought a Snow Peak Lite Max after much personal debate. The PR and Lite Max are the only stoves that will be used with the pot. My current pot is also large enough to hold a large canister of MSR fuel inside.

My criteria are as follows:

Must have a capacity between 22 and 26 oz.
Diameter must be great enough to accomodate a 4 oz MSR fuel canister.
Must have some sort of handle. I refuse to use a gripper or bandana. Just not my style at all.
A lid is not important, I like using foil.
Must weigh less than 3.5 oz.
Preferable material would be an uncoated titanium. I'm not big on teflon, etc, and don't want a pot with that.
Must cost less than $45.

I cook and eat from my pot and want to continue doing so. When preparing a freeze dried meal, I boil water then throw the food in the pot to rehydrate (plastics and plasticy foils don't seem right to me) and I also do some "real" cooking in my current pot from time to time. The diameter is enough to allow some saueteeing as well as for perfect gas storage so that's a requirement.

Anyone using or know of anything close to that sort of pot?

PostedJul 6, 2008 at 7:28 am

I too am looking for a pot w/ similar criteria, although I plan on using mine with an alcohol stove. The closest that I've found so far is the Snow Peak 700.

http://www.rei.com/product/708071

It looks like it meets your critera for price, handle, material and fluid capacity. I don't know if removing the lid will get you close to 3.5 oz, but I'm sure someone here does. The measurements listed might be to small to hold a canister. Maybe turn the canister upside down with the bottom phlange towards the top of the pot?

PostedJul 6, 2008 at 8:09 am

Hey Mike, I posted a thread a few days ago pondering the weight without the lid, and someone replied that it was 3.25oz (2.75 w/o handles, .25 per handle) for the SP Trek 700. That's fairly close to what I'm looking for but I'm not sure of it's ability to hold a cartridge. Hmmm, maybe I should've asked for an inside diameter as well.

Edit: Mike, on REI's site they claim that a SP 110 fuel canister can be nestled inside, as well as a SP stove.

Now, I've got to figure out if the SP 110 canister is the same diameter as the small MSR canisters. And aren't small MSR canisters the same diameter as the large ones?

Charles Grier BPL Member
PostedJul 6, 2008 at 8:33 am

IMUSA is a South American maker of Hispanic cookware (Columbia IIRC). They make two sturdy aluminum mugs that may fit your needs. The smaller mug holds about two and a half cups, the larger holds 0.8 liter. The larger mug is 4" tall and 4.5" in diameter. I mainly use the large mug for my cooking; it weighs 3.6 oz after minor surgery on the handle and the addition of a lid fabricated from aluminum flashing and a wire bail for cooking over a fire. The smaller mug weighs about 2.8 oz with lid. I use it with an alcohol stove. I have used both of mine now for over two years with complete satisfaction. They cost less than $10.

The IMUSA mugs are available in the cookware section of WalMart; at least the ones around here. I have heard that not all the WalMart stores in the U.S. stock them but they sure do in my neck of the woods. IMUSA has a website with photos of the mugs but it takes some looking to find them.

I fit my cup, stove and cooking accessories in mine; it will also hold either a small or large fuel canister with room to spare.

I have some photos of my large one on Flickr and would be happy to post one on this site (if I can figure out how); let me know if you are interested. I would also be willing to purchase here (in limited numbers) and ship to those who don't live near an enlightened WalMart. You pay for the mug and shipping. PM me after you have checked out your local Wally World.

PostedJul 6, 2008 at 12:47 pm

Well, my most efficient pot is not economical at about $40. I have a 1.5 L. JetBoil pot (B/C wide pots are the most efficient shape).

The JB 1.5 L. pot has their "Flux Ring" (sorry, not related to the Star Trek Flux Capacator) corrugated ring around the outer bottom edge and a neoprene cozy around the side. This make for the MOST efficient pot I have found. The pot is the heart of the JB setup, accounting for much the greater part of their stove's efficiency.

Yes, It's a bit heavier than their "small & tall"
original pot so you can buy that one if you are a total ULer but you'll use more fuel, especially on long trips.

No ordinary pot W/O a "Flux Ring" type heat exchanger on the bottom will be as efficient. (I think Primus and MSR have pot bottom heat exchangers.) And Titanium is the LEAST efficient pots, esp. small, narrow Ti pots.

Eric
P.S. Oh yeah, the JB 1.5 L. pot has a folding handle.

PostedJul 6, 2008 at 8:11 pm

I just held a large and small (8oz/4oz) MSR canister together, the outside diameters are the same @ about 4 3/8".

I think the $10 pot that Charles mentioned is indeed worth a trip to Wally World (as much as I can't stand that place!).

I've also tried the Heineken Pot and I'm with you Bobby, I need some sorta handle. Even though it weighs 1.1 oz and transfers heat pretty well (2 1/2 cups to boil in 5-6 mins w/ an alcohol stove) I found it still too hard to grab and pour even using socks and a bandana. Being a natural clutz doesn't help either.

C'mon Eric! The Flux Capacator is from Back To The Future, not Star Trek! (darn it! my inner nerd just came out again…)

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
Loading...