Topic

Use Carbon Filter before or after SteriPen?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Simon Wurster BPL Member
PostedMar 19, 2008 at 10:30 am

I'm thinking of adding an activated carbon prefilter to my water treatment for the remote possibilty of herbicides and pesticides. I found one from Katadyn, and in-line version that you splice into any 1/4" reservior tube. My experience with other carbon filters is they require much less force than biological filters, so there wouldn't be too much resistance (so I could still "pour" from the reservior into a cookpot).

Most water treatment systems engage the carbon filter _before_ the bological fiter (a la Sawyer and Katadyn bottles), so I'm thinking there's a good reason for this, but I can't find any reference — maybe this has more to do with protecting the (more expensive) biological filter?

Anyway, my question is if I purify the water with the SteriPen, then access this water thru a carbon filter will the water be of the same quality as if I used the carbon filter first, then purified it?

Thanks,
Simon

Rick Dreher BPL Member
PostedMar 19, 2008 at 10:38 am

Hi Simon,

The only basis I can think of for this decision is if your prefilter also has a mechanical component (debris screen) in which case I'd filter prior to UV treatment. UV will be more effective in less-turbid water. Also, since bacteria cling to particles, you'll be reducing the biological contamination the UV needs to treat.

Hope this helps.

Simon Wurster BPL Member
PostedMar 19, 2008 at 11:01 am

Hi Rick,
Forgot to mention that I'll be using a SteriPen Prefilter first (to remove the particles).

I'd sure like to use the carbon filter after the SteriPen prefilter but before the SteriPen, but the kit gets more complex with juggling an intermediate container (say another Nalgene Cantene) to use to force the water gently thru the carbon filter, then use the SteriPen: scoop, pour, switch prefilters, squeeze, purify, pour — and only for 1 L at a time.

Rick Dreher BPL Member
PostedMar 19, 2008 at 11:56 am

Hi Simon,

I see your dilemma, and at the end of the day I can't envision a significant technical reason to prefer one sequence over another (carbon-UV/UV-carbon). I'll still give a faint nod to carbon first, since older carbon can shed bacteria.

I can't find a reference to the Katadyn carbon unit you're considering, but have you also considered a DIY carbon+mechanical prefilter that would combine those functions? It could simplify your workflow.

Simon Wurster BPL Member
PostedMar 19, 2008 at 12:34 pm

Thought about a mechanical device for the carbon filter, but weight starts to play an issue, even if it's DIY. I studied the inside of my old Sawyer water bottle to see if part could be butchered, but the Katadyn carbon filter is leaner and simpler.

Also thought about a gravity system as it wouldn't need the extra container either, but I'd rather stick with streamside or lakeside, on-the-go treatment.

If I come up with any further ideas, I'll post-back.

Thanks for your input, much appreciated.

Simon

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Loading...