Hey guys, wanted to solicit some eh, thermodynamic advice. When I saw Zelph’s Starlyte stove a few months ago (look here) I was really impressed by the simplicity and elegance of the design. But in my own testing the flame pattern was always very sputtery, as if the combustion was choked for oxygen or something to that effect. As I observed in another thread with larger-size tealight stoves, I suspected the flame pattern was too wide for its own good. So I’ve looked elsewhere.
Tonight I bought a tin of York Mints (here) and I’m intrigued by the possibilities. Now of course the tin itself is a lot wider, but I’m hoping to cut the burn hole in the lid much smaller than the total diameter, smaller even than the original Starlyte, hoping that will lead to a smoother burn.
I plan on filling this stove with fiberglass insulation, so my questions really pertain to how that works in holding / moving alcohol. I’m imagining this stove could have certain advantages over the Starlyte, so somebody check me here:
1) More alcohol can be held in this thing at one time. Longer burns. I can keep it full most of the time and simply cap the burn opening tightly while not in use. I’m hoping this will prevent any evaporation and allow me to simply light it up right where I left off the next time I want to boil anything. Yeah?
2) Since the tin is physically shorter, alcohol has to move a smaller distance against gravity (via capillary action) to get up into the burn zone, possibly allowing a more complete fuel usage than the Starlyte. Is this sensical? Does capillary action even take place in the FB?
If I soak the FB with alcohol and light the burn hole, can I expect alc to be drawn from the periphery into the center as the burn progresses?
Last but not least, I’m trying to ensure an efficient and smooth flame, and I’d like to use a Heine so I want most or all of it concentrated in the center of the stove. Any suggestions more clever or informed than a simple hole in the middle?
Thanks for your help guys.


