Matthew – I suspect that your speculation that hunting pressure modifies bear behavior is perceptive. I'm not so sure that the east / west distinction is. For example, bear population in the Adirondacks (east) and Quetico – Superior (midwest) both have reputations for being highly capable camp robbers.
Love to have a wildlife biologist weigh in but think that in the absense of population level behavior modification, any bear will adroitly find and utilize any food source in its territory. In Maine, I don't worry about them at all. Neither does anyone who I know. Hunting, especially as practiced here (baiting)removes individuals that are relatively unafraid of humans.
I am not advocating hunting or baiting – just speculating. Its the topic of rather hot debate here – no need to open that can of worms 'cause I won't argue.
The other variable may be density of recreation (ie how much available food is being carried thru a bear's territory). Part of this may besimple statistical probability – increased chance of crossed paths.
Where the two varibles amplify each other there are more incidents (ie high rec density combined with high bear populations combined with low hunting pressure lead to high incidence).
Interestingly in the east there is a fairly high incidence of bear encounters in suburban environments where the bears are capitalizing on trash cans instead of food bags.