Topic

Salomon XA Pro 3D Ultra


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) Salomon XA Pro 3D Ultra

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1226101
    Jeremy Fassler
    Member

    @sputter

    Locale: Northern California

    Just noticed that REI now has "Salomon XA Pro 3D Ultra" and they are clearing out their old XA Pro's.

    Can anyone see what is ultra about this as compared to the "old" ones?

    http://www.rei.com/product/763463

    I like this color better, but what else :)

    It looks like the color change may be the only difference?

    #1411188
    R K
    Spectator

    @oiboyroi

    Locale: South West US

    My sources tell me that there is additional cushioning in the forefoot area…

    http://www.argear.com/gear/grsalomonxapro3dultra-shoes.html

    #1411223
    Brett Tucker
    Member

    @blister-free

    Locale: Puertecito ruins

    >>Can anyone see what is ultra about this as compared to the "old" ones?

    They're ten bucks more expensive.

    Actually, the eyelets appear to be webbing, like on the XA Comp, rather than molded plastic, as on the original XA Pro. There was less friction in the plastic eyelet system, which meant the laces were less prone to wear and breakage in the Pros than the Comps.

    The new Pro weighs 1.5 ounces more *per foot* than the old Comp, which is currently half the price at REI.

    #1411229
    Jeremy Fassler
    Member

    @sputter

    Locale: Northern California

    Which makes me ask the new question :)

    Salomon XA Comp 3 vs the new XA Pro Ultra. What are the main differences there?

    Looks like "double density midsole" instead of "triple" and a nylon vs plastic shank?

    Any of that matter much?

    #1411334
    Brett Tucker
    Member

    @blister-free

    Locale: Puertecito ruins

    I can't speak to the Pro 3D Ultra, but the prior Pro 3D model differs (from the Comp 3) primarily as follows:

    Carbon-fiber-reinforced heel cup/outsole (Pro 3D only)
    Molded plastic eyelets (vs webbing on Comp)
    Mesh upper material (cosmetic differences)
    Toe box construction (Pro 3D is stouter)
    Dual-density (Comp 3) vs triple-density (Pro 3D) midsole

    In actual use, the Pro 3D seems to provide more stability and long-term cushioning. The Comp 3 is initially cushier, but it seems to break down more quickly. Both models could use more durable cushioning in the heel, moreso than in the mid-foot as it seems the Pro 3D Ultra is now offering.

    In general I've found the Comps to be fine for recreational running and dayhiking, while the Pro 3D is the more capable of the two for extended backpacking.

    YMMV. It'll be interesting to hear a report on the 3D Ultra.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...