Topic

Colorado Trail as Last-Minute PCT Alternate?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
John Rowan BPL Member
PostedAug 16, 2015 at 11:21 am

As noted in an earlier post, I had to bail out of a PCT thru attempt this year after inflaming a herniated disc that I've had for a long time. I got the all-clear from my doctor and PT to get back out on the trail, and I'm starting to plan my next month out. I was planning on doing a decent chunk of the remaining PCT (probably Ashland-Skykomish, but as a flip-flop to do the WA sections first), but I'm increasingly finding that fire closures and/or the credible threat of future fire closures are complicating things a bit.

Where all of this takes me is that I'm starting to look at the Colorado Trail as a possible alternate trip, especially since I've turned my eye towards another attempt at a PCT thru in 2017. (I.e. no desperate rush to get in as many PCT miles as possible this year.) I'm relatively familiar with the general trailhead logistics of the route from past investigations into doing this, and I'm obviously plenty comfortable with my gear, etc. at this point from my PCT hike (from which I also have a number of ready-packed resupply maildrops). Obviously, I would pick up a decent mapset and databook in advance of going out there and would study them as well.

My only real reservations about doing something like this is the general last-minute nature of the whole plan. While I'm plenty comfortable with planning out long-distance trips (as well as improvising within those plans when needed), I feel strange about going from idea to execution in the span of about a week for a 486-mile trip. I suspect a lot of this is merely psychological, since I know my trailhead logistics on both ends, have appropriate gear, have a rough idea of where I'd probably resupply (to be finalized), and am comfortable with the distance/terrain involved.

If I did the CT, I'd probably hit the trail around 8/22 or so and plan for 20-mile days to start, with a likely increase to mid-high 20s after a little bit. (I still have my trail legs as far as I can tell from my "recovery" hikes, and I was doing high 20s/low 30s in the High Sierra, so I think the mileage is reasonable.)

As I write this, I see that there's not really a question here- I'm mostly just using BPL as my "idiot check" for doing this. (And I still might just go back to the PCT.) While, at this point, I feel like I have a pretty good handle on what I need to do to prepare for something like this, it does feel very strange to so quickly pull the trigger on a trip that most people would spend weeks/months planning.

Luke Schmidt BPL Member
PostedAug 16, 2015 at 6:13 pm

I would say go for it but think about a few things. The CT is a great hike but it does have a few sections along dirt roads and a few low elevation sections that people whine about. I loved it but look at the route and make sure you will be happy.
Second there are a few dry sections where water sources are very marginal be aware of that. I liked Eric's guide but I found him too optimistic about water sources. The official CT guide rates water sources more realistically. If it's listed as marginal between Monarch Pass and the La Garita wilderness it might very well be dry. Also the section north of that last lake (I forgot the name) might be dry.

PostedAug 17, 2015 at 12:55 pm

I'd say go for it. Yeah, it might seem weird to plan a trip so quickly but once you've done a thru hike or two you realize that you really can plan these types of hikes in a week or two with no problem. A lot of folks tend to over-plan and think it takes six months of detailed study of maps and the internet to plan a hike. Just grab your gear, the basic mapset, and go. Maybe it's just since my first thru-hike was pre-information age but you really just don't need that much information and you can always adapt on trail. The official trail guide will help you plan for the dry sections and give you info on the towns you need to hit up for food.

If you have your trail legs you can cruise the trail. My wife and I had lots of time and did a leisurely pace of 12-15 per day and really enjoyed it. The only issue was our year seemed to have a lot of lightening and it got pretty intense at times. Plus we were high in the San Juans when the storms that brought all the flooding a couple years ago hit. That was a wet few days in our lives. We like to sleep in but ended up adopting a really early start time to be able to hunker down during the t-storms. You may have some days clipped short in the treeless zones due to lightening. Some of the trail towns are pretty cool too and worth a day to check out and rest.

Enjoy the hike!

John Rowan BPL Member
PostedAug 17, 2015 at 1:57 pm

I've decided that I'm going for it, after having given myself some time to learn more about the trail and plan everything out. Plus, I've been talking to my friends who are still out there and have been hearing words like "Armageddon," "smokebox," and "inferno" tossed around. I have a resupply plan mapped out (with the exception of me massaging one stop to switch over to the Collegiate West alternate, and I've already repurposed my leftover PCT boxes for the hike. Plus, a Durango finish sets me up nicely for a quick side trip to Mesa Verde in a rental car.

Considering that I usually wouldn't plan more than a day or two in advance when I was actually out on the PCT, I figure I'll be fine, although I'm not wholly unaware of the fact that the availability of information is dramatically higher on the PCT.

Also, I probably am going to do the Oregon PCT section when I finish, so it'll hopefully be the best of both worlds.

PostedAug 17, 2015 at 2:24 pm

STRONGLY recommend doing the Collegiate West route. Between it and the San Juans it made all the road and ski-resort walks worth it.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Loading...