Running shorts and wind pants vs convertible pants – Philmont

Ive only been on one trek so there are large parts of the ranch I have not seen, but I did cover the whole range south (Rayado turn around) to north (Ponil). Also not familiar with those pants so dont know how fragile they are.

That said – trail-wise, I cannot imagine anything except a Valle Vidal cross country that would cause problems. Conservation project is probably the luck of the draw. We did trail work where we were in the brush a bit. Spar pole climbing could sure do some damage if that is on your itinerary.

Thank you for the comments. Much appreciated!

Michael

Like Jay said, shorts are fine for all the hiking.

The events are where the convertible pants are needed. It depends on what you are planning on doing. I used my DriDucks rain pants one year for my long pants and used them for the conservation project. They were not good for that and got torn up.

I took convertible pants the other 2 times and think they are a better choice overall. If weight is a concern, there is a wide range of weights for convertible pants so be aware of that. You can find decent, lightweight convertible pants that can serve as your shorts so the only extra weight is the zip off portion.

I found that the zip offs were nice a few chilly evenings but wind pants would be fine for that too.

Thanks John.

I usually leave the convertible pants at home, but have a sneaking suspicion that they are the better choice given some of the activities. Both options are down in the garage sitting next to my bag. Need to put one in the bag in the next day or so – we leave Sunday.

Thanks – Michael

I think they require "pants" if you go on the horseback rides. If it isn't on your itenerary, than hike as comfortable as you can. You can always bring both to base camp and make a decision to leave one behind at that time. There might be more current advice from the Rangers that were not aware of.

Since I always hike in pants anyway, convertibles are my style. More durable and better spf than my exposed skin.

(I did bring my Montbell wind pants to act as rain pants. Never needed them once on our trek last year. )

On two different treks I've taken one pair of switchbacks, and one pair of running shorts. Has been a good 1-2 punch for me.

Thanks for all the comments. I'll bring the options just in case I change my mind in Base Camp, but I think I'll take the convertibles and throw in the running shorts (4.3oz) as sleep/extra. Not a huge weight penalty but I figure it will give me a good base to decide for future Philmont trips. 2 more sons yet to go.

My goal was to avoid the weight of the convertible pants vs. my shorts/wind pants at ~ 7.4oz. No need to be be weight obssesed – it is Philmont after all. I noticed a consitent thread of comments about the conservation projects : "wore my rain pants" and "tore them up." I figured the same would go for my wind pants so I'll err on the side of being conservative.

Thanks again for the comments.

Question here. I was looking at different convertible pants for both men and women. Why are the women ones heavier and have smaller pockets and less room in the thigh for rock scrambling. I am still looking for a men’s pair that would would fit me. OR 32’s are too large.

Liz and Royal Robbins started their company with a line of climbing clothes for women that were functional. You might check out their web site.

From what I remember (long pants needed) –

horse ride
conservation project
spar pole climbing

There may be something else, but I just don’t remember now.

To the OP’s original question:

During summer months I hike almost exclusively in shorts.  I have been to Philmont twice, and both times i have used the trail running shorts with lightweight wind pants combo when long pants were needed..  Worked out fine for the Cons projects and horseback riding.

Note:  I use a rain kilt so I I didn’t  have rain pants as an option.

YMMV