Topic

Fabric Testing and a Few Surprises

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
PostedMay 11, 2015 at 5:50 am

Well using the new DIY HH meter,
I have tested a few fabrics today
A good quality Silnylon, A groundsheet Fabric PU heavy and Crystal 35 experimental fabric.

The results are quite surprising

The silnylon out performed the suppliers rating so I guess they put a margin on there to be safe,

The Groundsheet exceeded all expectations, and went to 10,000 HHmm to the limit of my meter, even after folding, and even reached almost 3000 HHmm with heavy abrasion.

And finally Crystal 35 (why I built the machine in the first place) is not at all suitable for camping fabrics. Its just too fine, 2039 HHmm pretty poor, after folding 1020 very bad and abrasion just tore holes in it. Glad I tested it before spending money on it :)

Here are the full reports I put together with images etc.
https://goo.gl/Gfh7Qh Silnylon Report
https://goo.gl/BtxEzM Groundsheet Report
https://goo.gl/uVnR7H Crystal 35 Report

PostedMay 11, 2015 at 6:58 am

All ripstop fabrics. Do you have also plain weave fabrics to test as apparantly the presence of ripstopthreads has a negative impact on a HH ?

PostedMay 11, 2015 at 7:16 am

I do have some but not coated only dwr like pertex

In the ones i tested,
Some leaks were on seams and some not, just random i think.

Do you have a link to the type of fabric you are thinking of ?

James Marco BPL Member
PostedMay 11, 2015 at 7:36 am

Hi Gary,
Thanks for testing these. Something you did not test for was resistance/recovery to stretching. Perhaps by weighting one side with 100kg, then testing?? This is always a problem with nylons. The stretch around any poles/guy-outs when used for a month. I recoat my sleeping tarps to help avoid these leaks. Many do not.

Note: It is not surprising that the silnylon showed jets almost at the same time as beads. The silicone coating is highly elastic, but when it breaks it is like popping a bubble. It just fails all at once.

The ground sheet is typical, around 10000HHmm. As I remember this was also reported by Exped several years ago for their tent floors. I agree, it is good stuff, but heavy. Probably not suitable for the typical UL camper.

The Crystal35 is typical of cheap PU fabric. I believe there is a minimum thickness for acceptable film strength. Thinner will leave almost none at the ripstop threads after rolling. I can almost discern a pattern of leaks similar to the ripstop threads, but more testing is needed to be confident. Perhaps a distribution analysis might be clearer.

PostedMay 11, 2015 at 7:43 am

A stretch test is a good idea,
Will have to think of an easy way
Weights good idea, but i need to maybe measure my pyramid tent to see what forces are on the guy lines when pitched.

:)

PostedMay 11, 2015 at 2:19 pm

Thanks. I know the wright syntax and I've done it dozens of times, so I thought it wouls be like always: easy. But not this time apparantly.

Roger Caffin BPL Member
PostedMay 11, 2015 at 3:33 pm

> The Crystal35 is typical of cheap PU fabric.
IF the coating on Crystal35 is shiny and only on one side, it could also be acrylic. That coating is used to stabilise very light fabrics, but it is not meant to be used as a waterproofing at all. I haven't seen the Crystal35 stuff, so I don't know.

Cheers

Jerry Adams BPL Member
PostedMay 11, 2015 at 3:49 pm

polyethylene seems pretty waterproof

why don't they bond polyethylene to nylon?

James Marco BPL Member
PostedMay 11, 2015 at 4:25 pm

Roger, In the test reports you will see that it is a PU coating and both sides.

PostedMay 14, 2015 at 9:37 am

thanks for the offer and it does look like great groundsheet
but I use the penne outdoors one and I have tested it to 10000hh 90gsm so this is ok for me and uk sourced.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
Loading...