Some of you guys made me doubt my original post. Rather than post more replies, I decided to do a thorough comparison test of this windshirt with some of the well known ones out there. Wearing the EMS shirt on a hike last week felt good, but I didn't know exactly where it stands when compared to others. Plus, it was a great evening for exercise!

THE TEST
13.8 mile cycling from Boston to Lexington. Park the bike.
13.8 mile walk/hike back with a light pack from Lexington to Boston.
TESTING METHOD
Bike 2 miles, switch a shell. After biking and testing all the shells, park the bike and hike back switching shells every 2 miles. Assess the sweat amount – pseudo-scientifically. Does it feel more sweaty? Does it stick? What works? What doesn't?
SHELLS TESTED (let to right on photo)
1. EMS Excel Excel Ultra-Pak windshirt
(ripstop nylon, denier unknown)
2. Arcteryx Squamish
(2014 edition, Gossamera ripstop nylon)
3. Montbell Tachyhon anorak
(7D ballistic airlight ripstop nylon)
4. Westcomb Focus LT hoody
(light eVent DVL hardshell shell)
THE RESULTS
Overall, I had a fantastic workout and was able to make a few observations, with a small surprise along the way. To save you the reading time – surprisingly, all the above windshirts performed relatively the same, with the eVent shell failing pretty fast.
EMS WINDSHIRT + ARCTERYX SQUAMISH
These two were pretty much the same, it was very hard to tell which one is the more breathable of the two. For some context – Prolite Gear rated Squamish as the most breathable jacket of the lot. Better than Tachyon and Houdini. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zh4Y3pmJsBQ
You can breathe a little through the Squamish, and a bit less so through EMS, however, I never felt clammy in either. Both jackets have a soft woven exterior and interior and feel comfy on skin. No plastic bag feel and you don't look like the Tin Man. Both are 2-way stretch. EMS seems to be significantly more water-resistant than Squamish, wetting out after 30-40 minutes, versus 10 min with dead bird. Still testing out the water resistance.
MONTBELL TACHYON
MB felt good and airy, but I started sweating while on hills. Because of the pure siliconized nylon fabric, it felt somewhat clammy when in full motion. The great thing about Montbell is it does pack a smaller than the two above. I could easily stuff it in the pocket while cycling. The EMS and Squamish jacket also packed small, but with a slightly bigger bulge in the pocket. Not surprisingly, Westcomb eVent shell does not even begin to fit into the pocket.
The big disadvantage of the Tachyon is that it becomes an airship in the wind. Seems like that's due to a very baggy fit and the light denier of the fabric. Even in light winds, MB is quite loud and constantly flaps in the wind, wrapping over your body. If there's a drizzle, the constant flapping causes mild misting and early seepage through the fabric. Neither Arcteryx nor EMS flap enough to notice, which is a big plus in my book.
WESTCOMB FOCUS LT
I brought it for context, to help compare the extremes. No surprise here – the Focus is by far the least breathable of the bunch. No surprise here. Even though waterproof-(slightly) breathable eVent DVL is one of the best hardshell membranes out there, it's still far away from actual breathability.
Curious what others think once they get the EMS jacket. Also, does anyone have any experience with Arcteryx Squamish?

