Topic

Field Test of Montbell Down Inner Jacket and Fleece…

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
PostedNov 3, 2007 at 8:10 am

I did a "field test" (aka Ryan's fairly wooded backyard) last night. Here is what I did.

— Question: How would a fleece pullover compare in warmth (while sleeping) to a Montbell Down Inner Jacket when utilizing all layers available to me during a normal backpacking trip?

— Hypothesis: The Montbell will be warmer! Duh!

— Experiment:
1) Ground insulation (REI Lite-Core R=3.4, Closed-cell foam pad R=~1)
2) Sleeping bag (el-cheapo synthetic summer bag rated by manufacturer at 48*)
3) Cloudveil Peak pants, nice big warm socks, warm beanie.

Top Layering (from skin out):
1) Lightweight long-sleeve cotton shirt (I don't have my Icebreaker yet, alright! Don't hate me!)
2) Montbell jacket.. OR… the Old Navy Fleece pullover.
3) Houdini wind shirt (with hood on)
4) Marmot Precip (with hood on)

Slept under the stars – no tarp, no bivy. I got into bed at midnight and slept until 3:45 AM. I got up, went inside, and replaced the Montbell for the Fleece. All other layers stayed the same. Slept until 7:30 AM. The low was right around 32-34 degrees; no wind; not a cloud in the sky. (I didn't measure the humidity).

— Results: I wasn't toasty with either setup. I would say I was slightly chilly at times, but content enough that I got some decent sleep. The weird thing is that I felt the same temperature-wise with the Montbell as I did with the Fleece!

— Comments:

1) I don't know what weight this Old Navy fleece is, but it's thin. I don't know much about fleece, but I can't imagine fleece would be made much thinner than this. It weighs in at 11.6 oz.
2) Sleeping with the Precip on? I know – kinda dumb. Or is it? I figured it would give me one more layer, and if I was miles away from a car and cold, I'd probably put it on.

So why didn't I feel warmer with the Montbell? The only thing I can think of is that the down loft was compromised from wearing the Precip. The Houdini was right on top of the jacket though; I'm not sure if that would keep moisture off or not. But it wasn't like I got into bed feeling toasty, and later woke up cold. I only wore it 3 1/2 hours, and I definitely wasn't perspiring from being too warm. I'm skeptical that the down lost any significant loft.

PostedNov 3, 2007 at 8:00 pm

Perhaps your body temperature is coldest during the second half of the night. If that is true, your test didn't compare apples to apples.

PostedNov 3, 2007 at 9:42 pm

Well as they say one test is worth a thousand hypothesis. Thanks for taking one for the team.
Im not surprised at your result. I own a few fleece down clothing items.
If I'm reading your results correctly and the jackets are approximately equal in warmth while stationary, the 6.9 oz Montbell tested out at almost twice the warmth per unit weight of the 11.6 oz fleece. That is why many of us carry these Montbell down jackets. If there is a wind or you are active, the nylon-shelled down will prove even warmer per unit weight, IME.

EndoftheTrail BPL Member
PostedNov 3, 2007 at 10:52 pm

Per MontBell's catalog, the UL down jacket is supposed to be "warmer than most heavy fleece jackets"! This means not just warmer per unit of weight as Brett mentioned above, but warmer in the absolute sense! And yet, Ryan wrote that his down jacket felt less warm than his light fleece jacket!

Brian wrote that both set up felt slightly chilly, but still generally OK enough to fall asleep. I am thinking that perhaps Brian took a while to fall asleep in the first half of the night when he wore the MontBell — and / or slept fitfully — after all, it wasn't toasty warm — and thus he was quite aware of the surrounding coolness.

By the time Brian started testing the fleece set up at 3am, he was probably much more tired — and so he fell asleep more quickly and slept more soundly (the fleece set up wasn't toasty, but it was good enough overall). Thus, Brian probably felt the coolness of the fleece much less. In other words, having fallen into a quicker and deeper sleep, he felt pretty OK. Just a guess, of course.

PostedNov 16, 2007 at 11:16 pm

then i would have to say that based on my experience the mb down inner is much warmer than most of the fleece jackets i own (and now only use for snowboarding or cross country skiing). plus, as brett says, so much lighter and compactable.

If you want warmth and are willing/need to carry the extra ounces, check the mb alpine down jacket. got that last season for winter treks… oh so warm.

PostedNov 17, 2007 at 11:34 am

I tried both the fleece and the jacket out again a couple nights ago. I didn't sleep in them, and I was much less "scientific" this time. I just tried them on and stood around outside. It was about 27 degrees outside, and there was definitely a noticable difference.

The colder it gets the easier it is to tell a difference between two clothing systems, and I think my previous experiment (with my sleeping bag) might not have been cold enough for me to tell the difference. (I don't know if I'm making any sense).

>>> If you want warmth and are willing/need to carry the extra ounces, check the mb alpine down jacket. got that last season for winter treks… oh so warm.

You said it Dylan – I just got one… so nice and puffy.

PostedNov 21, 2007 at 1:48 pm

yeah, isn't the alpine nice? it makes the ul inner seem even lighter.

i also have to ask, is your avatar pic taken on the na pali coast? looks a lot like it.

PostedNov 22, 2007 at 9:28 am

we only day hiked out a few miles on the trail. i've wanted to go back and do a few nights out there.

na pali trail

na pali 2

Jonathan Ryan BPL Member
PostedJan 14, 2008 at 6:32 am

Hello,
my fiance and I are thinking of going out and doing a multiday hike at Na Pali for our honeymoon next November. Does anyone know where I could find solid info on the hikes and/or island conditions? Thanks

PostedJan 14, 2008 at 7:15 am

There should be a difference in relative warmth of the two pieces depending on how they're used. When the wearer is laying in a sleeping bag the down will be compressed underneath the wearer, so the piece will lose much of its insulating ability. Fleece, however, doesn't compress that much, nice when you're in a sleeping bag, not so nice in a stuff sack. However, when in camp the relative results might be quite different.

As a second experiment, try unzipping the down jacket and laying it over you like a quilt, rather than wearing it.

Dale Wambaugh BPL Member
PostedJan 14, 2008 at 12:49 pm

Fleece needs at least an outer layer like a windshirt to be more equivalent with down as the down has two wind blocking layers, plus the loft. Fleece is warm and comfortable against the skin and less binding for sleep. Down can compress and pack better than fleece. Fleece is relatively cheap compared to down, although some manufacturers seem to think it is gold. Fleece is much easier to wash and maintain than down.

The most important differences: fleece is superior in moderate cold and wet environments. Down is superior in higher loft and extreme dry cold, where the comparison shifts to polyester fiber fills like Primaloft, Delta, and 3D and the superior wet performance remains. Down delivers more loft for weight and packs better.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
Loading...