Topic

News article about PLB/Spot/InReach use in California

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Rex Sanders BPL Member
PostedApr 24, 2015 at 10:29 pm

Good article in the San Jose Mercury News by Heather Somerville:

High-tech backcountry gear — with wilderness smarts — can save your life
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_27977480/high-tech-backcountry-gear-wilderness-smarts-can-save

Interesting stats:

“sos activations in California by personal beacons and satellite devices”

87 – 2014 Total SOS activations
51 – True emergency
17 – Nonemergency
19 – Accidental

“Source: California Office of Emergency Services”

I recommend reading the entire article.

— Rex

Bob Moulder BPL Member
PostedApr 25, 2015 at 4:48 am

Pretty good article… hits a lot of the points that have been hashed out quite a bit on BPL.

That is a very high rate of false alarms.

Makes one wonder how many of the "true emergencies" were also preventable with common sense, the example of Kate Matrosova being one such; although it was used to illustrate the occasional unreliability of technology, the overwhelming (and real) issue in her unfortunate demise was actually poor decision-making. No experienced hiker/backpacker in his/her right mind would have been up there in the conditions in which she arrogantly persisted.

It also goes to show how easily facts can be cherry-picked to make one thing look like another. Not saying that was the author's intent, although it was the result. Perhaps it was vastly oversimplified for editorial reasons — for brevity to make that one point, maybe?

Wide open to debate, of course, is where is the line between easily preventable/forseeable and something that wouldn't be anticipated by an experienced backpacker?

But the guy who thought he saw a wolf? That is just stoopid-funny.

All MVHO of course.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Loading...