Topic

supplement xtherm

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
Jeff M. BPL Member
PostedMar 28, 2015 at 9:27 am

I'm curious if xtherm users usually supplement the pad with a thin CCF pad to protect from punctures. I'm looking for a new pad and I keep going back and forth between the xtherm large and synmat winterlite MW. I had the synmat UL 7 but would always supplement it with a 1/8" CCF due to the lighter material used, which adds 3-4 ounces of weight. I'm wondering if I can get away with using the xtherm and not have to worry about using the CCF pad. I think the new ones have a 50d bottom.

bjc BPL Member
PostedMar 28, 2015 at 9:58 am

Two years of use with 70d bottom. I have only used a sylnylon bottom bivy, sil net tent or polycryo under mine. Only time I punctured was on the top because of my carelessness. Can't speak to the new lighter bottom. I could see using a ccf pad if on harder rougher ground.

Mike M BPL Member
PostedMar 28, 2015 at 1:38 pm

I supplement my therm in very cold weather w a 3/16 ccf pad for a little more R value. I've found the therm to be pretty durable

PostedMar 28, 2015 at 10:16 pm

I've used a ccf pad under mine as a groundsheet for the last few years, and also bivied with mine without ccf on sharp rocks without a puncture. My friend has slept hundreds of nights on his without a puncture. I think the 70d is quite durable. I also just used this pad with just a cuben floor beneath on a 6 day ski traverse that included single digit temps a couple nights and I never felt the least cold underneath. This has been almost my only pad for the last few years, and besides being a tad more narrow than I would like, its been an amazing bit of gear. I think of the xtherm as a game changer, for sure. If its really cold, I'd recommend inflating it a couple of times before bed. Its a lot warmer as the pad is fuller.

Jeff M. BPL Member
PostedApr 1, 2015 at 8:47 am

"Used to be 70D bottom, not anymore"

Yep, I'me thinking 50d may be tough enough not to have to supplement with a thin CCF still whereas my Exped Synmat UL 7 was 20d and worried me. It may have been fine but I was worried using it alone. My idea behind getting the xtherm (large) is it weighs close to the same as my UL7 (regular) with CCF pad so long as I don't have to use a supplemental pad and its a lot warmer. If not, the Exped Hyperlite MW w/CCF pad might be another option. I like the the xtherm is a bit warmer though.

Nico . BPL Member
PostedApr 1, 2015 at 10:09 am

For 3-season trips, I don't supplement my NeoAir or Exped pads with any additional protective ccf padding. I just try to clear my sleeping area of any thorns, sticks, sharp rocks, etc and hope for the best. So far, so good.

On cold winter trips, I do bring a thin ccf pad, mainly just as an insurance policy in the event I should spring a leak. a little extra R-value never hurts either. No ground insulation on a 10* night would be brutal…

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
Loading...