Many have mentioned that the decision to take a windshirt or not depends on the individual and the conditions. I agree.
I also wonder whether many people's experiences with windshirts and their subsequent decision making is a result of the CFM of the fabric in the windshirts they have used.
Someone who just so happens to pick a windshirt with a CFM that approaches that of a rain shell (eg 0-2 range) probably doesn't notice a significant increase in breathability over their rain shell, and thus wonders what all the hype is about, and leaves windshell at home in the future. Good choice!
Someone who was lucky and happened to pick a windshirt that has a good CFM, eg 30-35, would have a different experience of course, as in dry windy conditions where they are active their windshell is adequately breathing doing exactly what the whole windshirt paradigm is meant to achieve.
I formerly belonged right in the what the hell are they for camp.
But, in Japan in 2013 I was pretty lucky, in the absence of data, I picked up a Montbell Tachyon Anorak. CFM of this is I think ~9.5, so much more than a rainshell (though probably not perfect). I have had awesome experiences with it. If I had happened to get one made of pertex GL, which seems to be in the 0.5CFM range, my experience would have almost definitely sucked. To be honest I still would have used it sometimes (eg training runs at night, just coz I had bought it and it was light and I could stuff it in a running short pocket) but for hiking I would have said no.
So, I wonder if a pilot study is worthwhile. If you are in the "I dont see the point, in my experience it didn't work" camp and actually did have a windshirt that you tried, what was it?
Also, if you have had success with windshirts, what was it?
There are multiple complicating factors (and I can't be bothered running multivariate statistics on this, I have other more important research issues to contend with), but I hypothesise that there could be a correlation here.