Have you ever pondered the question: If I chose the lightest stove in each category and used it as efficiently as I could, how would the cooking system carry weights compare for different usage levels and trip lengths? My inquisitive mind couldn't resist the challenge, so I rounded up the lightest/most efficient white gas, remote canister, top mount canister, integrated canister, alcohol, and fuel tab stoves commercially available and pursued answers to the following questions:
- What is the real carry weight of stove plus fuel for different cooking systems?
- How do I calculate the amount of fuel I need for a trip?
- How much does fuel efficiency make up for stove weight on a longer trip?
- What is the comparative cost for stove plus fuel?
- Considering the fuel cost, which cooking system is the most economical and weight efficient?
These are, of course, difficult questions. There are many variables involved, and the answers depend on the type of trip you are taking and its location. No matter. This project provides a lot of insights into the issues, and will increase your understanding of how the weight and efficiency of different cooking systems compare, how they affect the weight you carry on your back, and how they affect your wallet. In this article you will find information to help you choose the cooking system(s) that meets your needs, and dial in the amount of fuel that you actually need to take on your trips.
ARTICLE OUTLINE
- Introduction
- Cooking Systems Compared
- Fuel Containers
- Windscreens
- Table 1: Summary of Cooking System Components and Weights
- Highlights
- Stove Testing Procedure and Results
- Table 2: Cooking System Test Results
- Highlights
- Extrapolating Cooking System Test Results to Field Conditions
# WORDS: 2300
# PHOTOS: 8
# TABLES: 2
Member Exclusive
A Premium or Unlimited Membership* is required to view the rest of this article.
* A Basic Membership is required to view Member Q&A events

Discussion
Become a member to post in the forums.
Oh, and if using motor gasoline as white gas, buy it in the summer (in places that have a winter) because summer-blend gasoline is lower volatility (more towards white gas) with Reid Vapor Pressures of 7.8 to 9 psi while winter blends can be as high as 15 psi*.
*yes, it would seem that 15 psi “vapor pressure” means it would be boiling, but RVP is measured at 100F and in winter the gasoline in transport, storage and use would always be below that.
Bonus tip: when driving your car in winter, from say, San Jose to Tahoe, plan to full up in Tahoe when you arrive so you get winter-blend gasoline for easier starting and smoother running.
Bonus tip#2: when carrying lots of backpackers from Berkeley to the Sierra in the summer, I’d top off before leaving the Central Valley both to get the lower price, but also to get the 87-octane “regular” rather than the 85-octane “regular” at elevation. Â Usually the 85-octane high-elevation “regular” worked fine at elevation, but with a heavy load and steep climbs, I’d get a little knocking with the lower-octane fuel.
so you get winter-blend gasoline for easier starting and smoother running.
Same applies to diesel.
After leaving my diesel LandCruiser parked in the snow for a week, the filter filter was so blocked up with wax from summer diesel that the engine could barely run. That was sorted out after very gently cruising downhill with the engine hiccuping for 10 minutes, when the engine bay finally warmed up. A once only event!
Cheers
A (risky) hack to make winter diesel is to add 5% gasoline and stir well.
Risky, and possibly ineffectual. Adding gasoline will not remove the heavier waxes which freeze out. Auto club or Gov’t experiments needed (not fuel companies).
‘Winter diesel’ is supplied to necessary towns in winter here. Same retail price but probably slightly more $$ to refine.
Cheers
You know more about this stuff than I do (chemistry).
Years ago we were remodeling the station I managed. The new technology was mind-boggling. Dual capture containment basins under the tanks with computerized monitoring equipment.
In the old days the plumbing for the gas pumps came up through the ground. Inside the gas pump housing, the base where the plumbing came out of the ground was dirt. Any leaks from the pump would just drain into the ground. When our new pumps — MPDs (multiple product dispensers) where being installed I noticed there were small containment basins at the base of the MPDs. One of the MPDs had a small leak during testing and filled the basin; probably a gallon or two at most. So the guy goes to his truck and gets a wet/dry vacuum. I stop him and say that looks like a bad idea. Nah, he does it all the time. So I get a chair and sit about 50 feet away and tell him I’ll call 911 when the explosion occurs. Nah, ain’t going to happen. A few seconds later the vacuum is engulfed in flames. While I put the fire out with an extinguisher, I made sure to spray him real good too :)
While I put the fire out with an extinguisher, I made sure to spray him real good too :)
Ah – did he appreciate it? Either you putting the fire out, or being foamed?
Cheers
Not happy to be being foamed, but truly embarrassed. Of course I told his boss because they obviously had serious training deficiencies.
Become a member to post in the forums.