Topic
the effect of baffle design on en-ratings
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › the effect of baffle design on en-ratings
- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by
James holden.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 12, 2016 at 1:21 am #3401963
heres a question thats always bug me
while we all know that god is on the side of more down (to paraphrase napoleans big battalion quote)
how much of an effect does the shape of down baffles have on the en-rating
case in point the new marmot hydrogen is en-rated ~5F (24F vs 29F) warmer than the older one despite having the same amount of down, and the new one is 800 vs 850 fill … and the overall bag became lighter as well, but the fabric stayed the same (no drop in denier)
new hydrogen …
https://marmot.com/products/details/hydrogen-new
BPL review of old hydrogen …
https://backpackinglight.com/marmot_hydrogen_bag_review/
specs for old hydrogen … note the weight and down fill amount are for a tall size on marmots site for the old version
https://web.archive.org/web/20151106175744/http://marmot.com/products/details/hydrogen-new
https://www.rei.com/product/762525/marmot-hydrogen-sleeping-bag
the hydrogen isnt known as a “small” sleeping bag either …
seems like the biggest changes (warmth wise) are …
- Anatomically Designed Footbox with Wrap-Around Construction increases Warmth
- Smooth-Curved Baffles Reduce Down Shifting. Nautilus Multi-Baffle Hood limits heat loss
so my question is how much does baffle design have on the “warmth” of a bag/quilt
from the old backpacker mag …
;)
May 12, 2016 at 8:18 pm #3402143Eric,
You said in part, “Here’s a question that always bugs me. How much of an effect does the shape of down baffles have on the EN-rating?”
Odds are the baffle design is not what accounts for the majority of the 5F difference in the EN 13537 ratings given the bags have the same dimensions and same amount of down but, 50FP lower on the new. Only the tailoring changes to better seal the hood and eliminate foot compression for the test dummy fit would account for this much difference.
I take a thermal image of every garment that I test the iClo of. The most recent garment I tested was the LUL HyperDry Vest on 5/9/16. It is shown below just to illustrate how the seams show up in a thermal image. Temperatures in a thermal image are not linearly related to the insulation values. They are sewn through seams with seam heat leakage about in the middle range of all garments that I have tested (includes sewn-through, box-baffled, and complex box-baffled). The seams make up a very small percentage of the total surface and negatively impact the insulation value accordingly.
- LUL HyperDry Vest in Environment Chamber Photo
2. LUL HyperDry Vest in Environment Chamber Thermal Image
3.Thermal Values
4. Baffle Designs
The following table lists a few of the best and the worst seams designs I have tested. As you can see, seam heat leakage, is negligible in both box baffle designs and even sewn-through designs, if you use a windshirt or hard shell over the jacket. The same concept would apply to using a sleeping bag or a quilt in combination with a light bivy.
Note that standard environmental test condition is a 95F guarded hot plate (max skin temp) and 68F ambient environment. The closer a seam value is to 95F, the worse the heat leakage (Max F in table below).
The MB Permafrost baffle is welded, not sewn, to the Gore-Tex Windstopper outer layer. It is hard for me to I envision a much more reduced heat loss than that construction.
The MEC Reflex (14 oz 800 fill) was construction with a proprietary offset box baffle and leaked more heat than the MB Permafrost seams.
Company’s attempt to differentiate their products based on their unique baffle designs. Â I haven’t seen a benefit in my testing nor have I seen any neutral research to support the marketing claims. Ask a vendor you are interested in to send you a thermal image of their bag and a equivalent WM bag to prove it to yourself.
Typical EN 13537 Test Result Report
Sleeping bag seams heat leakage is such an insignificant component of an EN 13537 rating, that it not even normally tested for. The following is an example of the laboratory report that the manufacturer receives after a complete EN 13537 test battery. See EN 13537 Report
May 12, 2016 at 10:38 pm #3402182thanks for the info richard …
thats pretty interesting as brit companies like rab, ME and PHD love to promote the “trapezoid baffling” on their bags
2 further questions …
- is there a benefit to tighter baffle spacing … obviously too big and its no good, but whats a good size … for example the MH phantom promotes its tight baffle spacing …
- going beyond static en-ratings … does the different baffle construction help prevent the down from shifting during the night, especially if someone moves around .,, some bags can develop cold spots as the down shifts
its very interesting when one see various bags using the around same amount of down, yet with quite different en-ratings
perhaps one should ask what feature DO matter to improve the en-ratings beyond the down itself and the snugness of the bag …
;)
May 12, 2016 at 11:17 pm #3402185Eric,
The quantity and quality of the down, the surface area, and the ability to seal any leak points are the primary rating determining elements.
Ask for the EN 13537 test report for any two bags you want to compare.  The report details what elements of the bag designs test  differently.
As long as the down density matches or exceeds the baffle volume, the bag is good. Density exceeding the baffle volume holds up the best to the stresses but… Most consumers think the better bag is the thicker one and so the manufactures don’t overfill (thinner for same weight) unless a knowledgeable consumer requests it.
May 13, 2016 at 11:20 am #3402266thanks richard …
its amazing how much a few small changes can have a large effect …
for example the new marmot xenon got ~ 1 oz more down, loss about 1″ in girth, and has a redesigned hood and foot box …
and its en-rating jumps by 10F, for women its now a ~10F bag instead of a ~20F bag … and it weights LESS than the older version (which my climbing partner has)
new …
https://marmot.com/products/details/womens-xenon-new
old …
https://web.archive.org/web/20151017135147/http://marmot.com/products/details/womens-xenon-new
in fact all of marmots new “UL” down bags have seen significant jumps in their ratings … the redesigned ones anyways ….
;)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
HAPPENING RIGHT NOW (February 11-21, 2025) - Shop Hyperlite Mountain Gear's Biggest Sale of the Year:
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.