Topic
Extra Wide Foam Folding Mat?
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Extra Wide Foam Folding Mat?
- This topic has 13 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 12 months ago by Curt Peterson.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Dec 31, 2019 at 9:05 am #3624975
Anyone been able to find a wide (24″+) folding foam mat?
I don’t need the R-value super high, as I’d be using a torso length piece (4-6 segments?) for under my air pad. I’d use my (yet-to-be-made) MYOG back under my foot section.
I want it longer so I can use it as a pack frame, and so it can go above my shoulders. I plan to make a hip belt and attach load lifters. I personally think load lifters are instrumental in good weight transfer/distribution, otherwise the pack hangs to the back. Maybe it’s a mental thing, but if the pack doesn’t go above my shoulders, it’s not a proper fit for me.
The widest I could find anywhere was 22″ wide. I think the z lite is 20″? The 22×72 off-brand version I found on Amazon claims to be only 10 oz, so I imagine the section I’m looking for would be somewhere in the range of 6 oz, which is justifiable to me. I plan to use it with the 0.7 mil window film.
Dec 31, 2019 at 11:41 am #3624991Evazote(?) CCF is available in a variety of width/lengths from MLD in 1/8 and 1/4” thickness. You can score it with a hot knife or soldering iron so that it folds better. I don’t think it will give you a ton of stiffness if you are after load transfer.
Dec 31, 2019 at 12:05 pm #3624992Thanks Matthew. I’ve seen those and gossamer’s hammock pad. I’d like the rigidity of the folding pad. Ideally I’d do a U-shape fold (back panel and two sides) inside the pack. I figure that boxy shape would give the pack more rigidity as a frame with load lifters.
Trying to go for a duel purpose. I already have an xlite, so I’m not replacing my pad, just planning on supplementing it for protection. I don’t care what anyone says, 0.7 mil polycro isn’t a lot of protection for an air pad. Neither is 1.5 mil. I shredded that pretty easy in GCNP.
Alternatively, I know some people put their ridgerest or CCF roll inside the pack. The ridgerest does come in a wide size (25″), but I don’t like the rolled pads. Too bulky for me personally.
I wonder If I could combine two pieces of a zlite butted up together with either carbon tent pegs or short arrow shafts (smaller diameter?) working as dowels…
Dec 31, 2019 at 1:11 pm #3624996Maybe cut up one or two Zlites and place them sideways underneath you. If needed, connect the pieces with Velcro tabs on each piece, bridged with a longer Velcro strap.
— Rex
Dec 31, 2019 at 2:10 pm #3625000Also this, combined with extra-wide blue foam equivalent:
http://www.rayjardine.com/ray-way/Sleeping-Pad-Kit/index.htm
— Rex
Jan 1, 2020 at 5:28 am #3625057You could look for a used Thermarest Z-shield…I think they were 24 inches wide.
Jan 1, 2020 at 8:01 am #3625064https://www.foamorder.com/foam/eva.html
They have a 40″x80″ variable thickness foam sheets available.About 20 years ago I explored the “U” shape as a possible more efficient pad that would also support loads. It works well but it takes up a LOT of volume in the pack.
Generally, for a pack that is 12″x6″x25″ this yields a 2′ length. Doubling the standard 1/2″ thickness only gives you about a 4′ length, and so on. (Discounting the joint loss which would be about 1″ per layer.) The 1/2″ evazote pads do help with pack loads up to about 30pounds with three layers (roughly a 58″ length.) At about 25pounds the CCF starts to collapse and at 30 pounds looses a lot of rigidity despite the corners. Each layer tends to slip against the other causing overall support problems.
The obsolete GG Nightlight pads worked far better since these were dimpled pads. When nested together they work out to a half inch per two layers. The nested bumps lock into each other forming a single relativly rigid structure. But, these were only about 20″ wide. A simple duct-tape joint works well after the layers are cut and aligned. I usually carry a 2, 3, or 5 layer pad (24″, 37″, or ~52″.) The joints open up a bit allowing a bit of extra length, roughly about 3/4″ per joint. The tape stays pretty well for around 5-10 years. The Evazote people might have some of this around iff you ask.
The volume for the pad at 1/2″x25″x58″ is 725ci. In comparison, a standard food bag is 8″dia x 10″length is around 500ci. So the pad will take up the volume equivalent in the neighborhood of one and a half food bags…a LOT. The internal pads don’t work real well because it requires a larger and heavier pack for the internal volume. A typical Murmur looses the capacity to the point of becoming a long weekend pack rather than a two week pack. So, besides the weight of the pad you also need a larger backpack increasing overall packing weight. In it’s simplest form, the least materials in a pack will weigh less, therefore smaller packs weigh less. (Generally speaking that is. Often the manufacturers do not use the same materials, soo things can get a lot more complicated than that.)
As far as the mechanics of walking goes, the human body requires a torsional twist at the back and an oblong (lift, rotate, repeat) from your hips. While the required internal structure you describe lets this happen, it also tugs the pack up with each step. After several miles on the trail, the pack itself will feel uncomfortable since there is no allowance for twisting the entire pack…only lifting at the corners against your back as you lift your leg to make each step. To allow any torsional twist only a flat ‘back’ panel works letting this to happen with no resistance from the pack weight. The “U” shaped support structure actually interferes with walking a little, making things rather uncomfortable after several miles, regardless of the load lifters.
Anyway, give it a try. Maybe you can figure out a way to create some flexible side panels and still maintain good resistance to pack collapse.
Jan 1, 2020 at 10:04 am #3625087I looked at the foam link and came up with a plan—imagine sleeping on a 4 inch thick EVA pad—I bet it could be used as a completely stand alone pad for winter camping and would provide both warmth and some real comfort. Only costs $288 ouch.
Then again, what would a 4 inch thick by 40 inch wide by 80 inch long pad look like strapped to a pack? Probably like a tractor tire. And weight? Who knows.
Jan 1, 2020 at 10:36 am #3625095Here ya go. The Field and Stream Folding Camp Pad is 23″ X 71.” I haven’t seen them anywhere except Dick’s Sporting Goods. $19.99. Weight isn’t listed.
Jan 1, 2020 at 4:43 pm #3625130Jan 1, 2020 at 6:49 pm #3625149Thanks Tyler. Wouldn’t be the first time a manufacturer exaggerated about specs.
Jan 5, 2020 at 5:53 pm #3625701Make your own – pretty straight forward…an old video but still gets lots of traffic :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuDxmsUgjGs
Steve
Jan 5, 2020 at 9:15 pm #3625742I’ve watched your video a couple times. The technique works really well. :)
Jan 6, 2020 at 7:52 am #3625770This one’s 40″ wide and 81″ long. $42. Fold it, cut it, roll it. This is what happens when you let social media name a product, too :)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.