Topic
Comparison of Acteryx Squamish and Nodin Windshirts
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Comparison of Acteryx Squamish and Nodin Windshirts
- This topic has 9 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by Stephen Seeber.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Apr 19, 2019 at 12:13 am #3589482
The Squamish windshirt has recieved a lot of attention on this forum, so I thought I would take a look at one. The Squamish and Nodin perform similarly. Their air permeability is fairly low-lower than the Patagonia Houdini Air I reviewed in a prior post. The results of the Hydrostatic Head pressure test suggest they won’t keep you dry for very long in all but the lightest rain.
If you have a windshirt you’d like tested and are willing to part with it for a few days, send me a PM and we will make the arrangements.
Let me know how my numbers may match your experiences with these garments.
Apr 20, 2019 at 3:37 pm #3589696Thank you, Stephen!
Have you tested any WPB fabrics using the same MVTR protocol you applied to the Nodin and Squamish?
Apr 22, 2019 at 1:58 am #3589861The present test reflects a suggestion by Richard Nisley to incorporate air movement into the testing process. I did numerous tests with no air, internal air movement (as shown here) and internal and external air movement. I expected that external air movement from a fan producing an 8 mph breeze would cause greater evaporation in the Houdini Air as compared to the Houdini. Instead, evaporation from both garments was reduced and there was in no case any significant difference in performance between the Houdini and Houdini Air. What instead happened was that increased convective cooling of the garment surfaces from outside air movement dropped the temperature of the micro climate beneath each garment. This dropped the vapor pressure differential between the micro climate and outside ambient so that evaporation through the garment dropped. So far, I have not proved that additional small differences in air permeability make a difference.
To answer your question, I have worked with WPB previously, specifically Gore-Tex and Neoshell and have gotten some interesting results. I will do some more work with these materials as the changes I make for the breathability test move along. It will be a while as the breathability test is inherently time consuming so test control and procedure development takes considerable time.
I hope to have something useful to write about by summer.
Apr 24, 2019 at 4:20 pm #3590206Based on your testing results (and Richards), with the 2019 Squamish and Nodin coming in at around 11 CFM, the Houdini Air at ~15 CMF, and the Montbel Tachyon at ~20 CFM, what options do we have for a windshirt/jacket at around 35 CFM? The only one i’ve been able to find currently available is the EE Copperfield 7D.
I’ve been researching this forum like crazy, but it seems like there are large variations from year to year of the same model windshirts.
Are there other options?
PS. Big thank you to Richard (@richard295) and Stephen (@crashedagain) for your hard work and time in reviewing, testing, and sharing your analysis of these windshirts!
Apr 24, 2019 at 10:05 pm #3590246Hi Zach:
Quick clarification. In my review, I published the permeability of the Tachyon to be 10.5.
I cannot answer your historic question, since I started making air permeability measurements this year. Richard has published photographs that document some fabric changes from year to year. However, in the testing I have done so far, I have not found a 35 CFM windshirt. I would like to test one. If someone has a 7D EE Copperfield wind shirt, I would be happy to test it. Even better, if someone has all three, that would make an interesting comparison. Turnaround on the testing would be a couple of days.
Apr 24, 2019 at 10:40 pm #3590254Hi Stephen,
Thanks for your reply. Seems your research is taking an interesting turn. I wish you luck and thanks again for sharing your work with BPL!
Apr 25, 2019 at 3:34 am #3590287Montane Featherlight 7 is also 7D. Intended for running, no hood. Unfortunately I don’t have access to one!
I do appreciate the time it takes to do such intense testing. We appreciate your contributions!Apr 26, 2019 at 1:17 am #3590444Hi Bill:
I looked at the featherlight 7 in the store and on line. It appears to be the same fabric, so I expect the same performance.
Thank you for your kind words.
Dec 31, 2019 at 12:44 am #3624948Sorry to revive your thread, and also apologies if it was explicitly stated and I missed it, but to clarify: this was a 2019 model Squamish you tested?
Thanks!
Dec 31, 2019 at 7:33 am #3624962Yes. 2019.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.