Topic
Single AA battery headlamps
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Single AA battery headlamps
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Sep 18, 2014 at 9:47 pm #2136117
Holy crap!
I want to thank Stuart R and Roger Caffin for the humbling experience.
I make and modify some of my gear, but would never have thought of hand making my own headlamp.
I bow to the masters.
Sep 18, 2014 at 10:00 pm #2136119Yeah, MYOG on BPL can a little bit like lunch with Dilbert:
Sep 19, 2014 at 4:41 am #2136135Has anybody used this Fenix light?
Sep 19, 2014 at 11:00 am #2136193Last night I got on the waiting list for the new Zebra light, much lighter than a headlight I'd get from Fenix. Twice the price, but about half the weight. Longer run time from what I could see too. Way longer, I mostly need one to read in the winter.
DuaneSep 19, 2014 at 11:08 am #2136195Is there a reason why the Fenix lights (HL50, HL22) don't list Lithium primary AAs as allowable battery types?
I.e., from the HL50 link,
"·Uses one 3V CR123ALithium battery or AA (Ni-MH, Alkaline) battery"
Sep 19, 2014 at 11:40 am #2136204Fenix does not recommend AA lithiums, the hl50 however uses the cr123a lithium bats or the AA nimh
However folks have tested it with AA lithiums and it ran …
As to weight of the zebralight, thats just for the light itself, not the headband of bats
Fenix list the weight without bats but with headband for the hl50 at 57g add 17g for a cr123 bat and we have 74g total
While we dont know the total weight of the new zebralight h32, the body weight is 33g …
For the h52 the body weight is listed as 32g but the total listed weight with headband and an eneloop AA is listed at 80g
Of course you could make your own headband with either one … But the short story is that NONE of these lights are substantially ligher than the other once you add everything in
Petzl lists their weight with bats (alkalines or lion)
http://www.zebralight.com/Headlamp_c_7.html
Also note that the new h32 only takes cr123 ant its rechargeable equvalent, forcing you to use those camera bats or bringing a specialized charger
Personally i just went with the tikka rxp, the usb recheargable lion bat and the hands free active adjustment with multiple modes made the most sense for climbing for me
I am debating whether to get a 900+ lumen nitecore hc90 for night climbing and finding rappels/descents in the dark… But that aint UL
As i said before, for all pratical purposes any of the light mentioned above will work just fine
;)
Sep 19, 2014 at 11:52 am #2136207Duane you're certainly right about the weight issue. I think part of that is that the Fenix HL50 is made for CR123 batteries and needs an extension tube to make it work with AAs. More metal=more weight. I'm not sure I follow on the battery life though. According to what I've found they stack up pretty evenly.
Zebra H52F
H2 – 172lm – 1.7hrs
M – 50lm – 7.5hrs
L1 – 2.7 – 4days (96hrs)Fenix HL50
H – 150lm – 2hrs
M – 55lm – 6hr20m
L – 3lm – 110hrsEDIT: Duane, perhaps you were referring to the HL22 (which would make more sense with the price difference you mentioned.) In that case you are right the Zebra would be much more efficient.
Frank,
It appears the HL50 it is really a CR123 based flashlight that includes and extension tube and insert to allow it to use AA batteries. For some reason the Fenix page doesn't load for me at work so I'm not sure how to explain what you're seeing on the HL22.Sep 19, 2014 at 11:52 am #2136208" 900+ lumen "
Geez, Eric, are you trying to be visible from space?
–B.G.–
Sep 19, 2014 at 12:13 pm #2136214Thanks Jesse & Eric. The page for the HL22 says "·Uses one AA (Ni-MH, Alkaline) battery" and the run times are given for those 2 chemistries. I was wondering why Lithium wasn't specifically called out but it's probably OK per Eric's link to CPF.
Sep 19, 2014 at 12:18 pm #2136216One 3V CR123A Lithium battery
One AA (Ni-MH, Alkaline, or Lithium) batteryI stand corrected … Lithium AA might be "officially" in
Best to send em an email to be sure
http://www.fenix-store.com/fenix-hl50-led-headlamp/
;)
Sep 19, 2014 at 12:19 pm #2136218A lithium primary battery typically has a little more open circuit voltage. That is enough to increase the LED brightness substantially, and that easily causes overheating if the LED was not selected wisely. To avoid an early-burnout problem, some manufacturers simply tell you not to use lithium primary batteries. This situation was more common several years ago and especially with some non-Zebralight manufacturers.
–B.G.–
Sep 19, 2014 at 12:46 pm #2136227Thanks for this Jesse:
"Other options:
XTar AA H1 – Unique in that it also includes a red LED for those who might want that feature. Can be found on Amazon for $45."Getting a lamp with red, I used it, and using it like it. But I don't use a light much at all, sleeping when it's dark, however do like red for near-in night tasks–reading my watch, locating aspirin.
OTOH, last March north of the Arctic Circle trying to photograph the aurora, we used red a lot. My red was feeble and I struggled badly, hands un-gloved too long, though with a borrowed camera. The big game hunters from OK had honking redlights and were always exulting. Is red pretty necessary if you want to do significant night photography?
Sep 19, 2014 at 1:18 pm #2136235"Red light in itself does not preserve night vision.
"If you go for a brighter light it does not matter if it's red green or blue it will still affect your night vision."
Additional comments supported this view.
Sep 19, 2014 at 1:24 pm #2136239I own flashlights from Fenix, 4 Sevens, and Zebra. I would say that the quality, components, and performance of all three is identical. Honestly, the differences are minor — user interface, etc.
On the Fenix vs Zebra single AA headlamp choice. The only real difference I can see is that the Fenix is designed for CR123 a battery and requires the included extension tube for use with AA. I have a CR123 for my emergency glove box flashlight in the car because it could be a year before I use it, it almost never gets used, and CR123s are better in sub-zero temperatures. For hiking, camping, and household use, I prefer AA flashlights because I have a pile of Eneloop batteries and a top-shelf NiMH charger. So for me, the Zebra is a better choice (lighter and smaller for the battery I use).
For an using disposable batteries (no access to recharger), the Fenix with the CR123s (or if you have a CR123 charger) would be a great choice.
You really can't go wrong with any of these.
On 2 AA flashlights, I went with 4 Seasons as they introduced flashlights with Cree XM-L LEDs before Fenix did.
Sep 19, 2014 at 1:52 pm #2136251@ Greg: I've read that before. I don't know the theory behind it, but I much prefer red light when reading, peeing in the middle of the night, and other small chores in the middle of the night. I can see more without hurting my eyes.
Sep 19, 2014 at 2:35 pm #2136259> One 3V CR123A Lithium battery
> One AA (Ni-MH, Alkaline, or Lithium) battery
> A lithium primary battery typically has a little more open circuit voltage.Note that a CR123 gives 3 V, while an AA lithium gives 1.5 V. It is clear that this torch uses an electronic up-conversion to generate the drive to the LED, so the actual supply voltage does not matter very much. The electronics will be a small, probably custom, microprocessor chip, as it operates from a single switch and has a memory for the mode.
Can they afford to put a micro in there? You bet: a small PIC costs about $0.60 in small quantities.
Cheers
Sep 19, 2014 at 3:20 pm #2136270Roger, they don't even have to use a microprocessor (overkill). Instead, they use programmable logic device such as FPGA. Some of those are selected because of extremely low standby battery power requirements (almost zero).
–B.G.–
Sep 19, 2014 at 8:36 pm #2136322I have a Petzl Zipka 2, which is generally enough output for my needs. But it takes 3 AAA cells. My GPS uses AA cells, as does my phone charger, so if I bring those on a trip it would be nice to standardize.
As a replacement, the Fenix HL21 would give me:
– Single AA battery power source (convenience)
– Slightly less weight than the Zipka (56g vs. 58g, both incl. batteries)
– More than double the light output on max (97 vs. 40 lumens)
– A 3 lumen low setting
– Better water resistance (IPX8 vs IPX4)
– No flashing mode to cycle throughBut here's where the screeching brake sound comes in. When I look at the run times, the Zipka is advertised with 90 hours on high (40 lumens) and 120 hrs on "low" (10-20 lm? not sure), whereas the HL21 is advertised with 2 hrs on high (97 lm), 5.75 hrs on medium (47 lm), and 53 hrs on low (3 lm).
I can ballpark the HL21 run times using the LED data sheet (Cree XP-E). I don't know what LED the Zipka uses — an array of 4, actually — but I'm having a hard time rationalizing >15X run time by the Zipka, at around the same output (40-47 lm).
Well, bleah… all that said, I think the HL21 goes on my wish list. Maybe I can give it a Zipka headband transplant.
Sep 19, 2014 at 8:53 pm #2136326Frank,fenix-store.com does list non-rechargeable lithium AA under batteries used. Not sure why fenixlight.com doesn't. In any case, I've been using a lithium battery in my HL22. So far, nothing bad has happened.
Sep 20, 2014 at 12:05 am #2136363Hi Bob
> they don't even have to use a microprocessor (overkill). Instead, they use
> programmable logic device such as FPGA.
They could, they could, but would they?
A Lattice iCE40LP1K-CM49 FPGA sells for $4.36 in 500 lots (others are more expensive)
An 8-bit 6-pin PIC10F200 sells for $0.31 in 5k lots,
An 8-pin PIC12F1572 sells for $0.43 in 5k lotsWhich would you go for?
Cheers
Sep 20, 2014 at 12:15 am #2136365"Which would you go for?"
Roger, you like to pick them off the top shelf.
I have an interest in Lattice, so I am biased.
–B.G.–
Sep 20, 2014 at 4:03 am #2136373Frank,
The run times are absolute and utter lies
For a true measured runtime accordint to the ansi standard go here for the tikka 2
http://www.outdoorgearlab.com/Headlamp-Reviews/Beam-Test?beamA=51079&v=3&beamB=49009
The other thing to keep in mind is that the tikka 2 is not regulated while the fenix is …
This means the fenix in theory provides more or pess constant brightness till it suddenly drops off
The tikka in theory degrades more slowly, but you lose brightness as well ….
For the bullshiet manufacturers try to pull read this
http://www.outdoorgearlab.com/a/11165/Why-Headlamp-Claims-are-Deceptive
;)
Sep 20, 2014 at 6:58 am #2136382There is an advantage to gradual dimming – it lets you know you have to replace batteries but you still have lots of time, so you don't need to carry a spare set.
My Lithium batteries last a year. On a trip or two I'll start noticing it's getting dim, so I'll replace the batteries. Carry a coin battery light as a spare.
Sep 20, 2014 at 3:47 pm #2136466As a general rule, the fully regulated flashlights (that maintain brightness instead of dimming over time) are the more sophisticated higher end products. It's one of the reasons to buy a Fenix or 4 Sevens or Zebra over the standard headlamps and flashlights.
Sep 20, 2014 at 6:04 pm #2136475Thanks again Eric. Good stuff in that article.
It looks like Fenix uses the ANSI run time method so I'm somewhat confident in their claims. At least their results are in the ballpark of the outdoorgearlabs test for the HP11, and not off by a factor of 10.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
BASECAMP LIVE FALL ’24 enrollment now open – LEARN MORE
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.