Topic
Calling all Coleman F1 Ultralight Owners
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Calling all Coleman F1 Ultralight Owners
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 20, 2007 at 8:17 am #1223307
Late last year I picked up an F1 Ultralight, and on my first test run noticed (smelled) that it was leaking gas after being screwed down to the canister.
So I dug up an empty canister to fiddle with, and noticed that when screwing it down I felt metal-on-metal before I felt the (internal) o-ring compress.
After some inspection, I noticed what I would describe as a "manufacturing tolerance issue" (which is illustrated in the first photo below), so I returned it and ordered another one.
With the second stove, while I still don't feel the o-ring compress, I don't smell gas leaking either; or at least I don't with the two canisters that I have on hand. I'm concerned that I might with other canisters (given some manufacturing variation).
Here is a photo which illustrates what I think the problem is.
Since the o-ring is at the bottom of this threaded insert, pressing the insert too far into the body will prevent the o-ring from making contact (with the canister).
The gap on my second stove is just under 1.0mm.
On my first stove, this gap was just over 1.0 mm.Question: For all the F1 Ultralight owners out there, does your stove have this gap???
– PLR –
May 20, 2007 at 12:54 pm #1389714Paul, just measured my F1 and there is a gap of less than a mm. I've been through a number of Snowpeak 110 g canisters and haven't yet had a problem.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention (great illustrations, by the way). I'll make sure I test my canisters before heading out.
May 20, 2007 at 2:48 pm #1389719I actually have 2 of these stoves. One I bought 2 or 3 years ago and the other purchased within the last 4 months. both have the gap. The older one is just under a millimeter and uniform all the way around. The newer one varies from about 0.5 mm on one side to 1mm on the opposite side. However, like Dondo, I have been using Snow Peak canisters and both stoves seal fine. I'll keep an eye out for problems. Thanks.
-MarkMay 26, 2007 at 4:12 pm #1390382Thanks Dondo and Mark for the feedback.
Both of you are using Snow Peak canisters, so now I'm curious as to why? Is it because of weight, price, performance, availability ???
-PLR-
May 26, 2007 at 9:48 pm #1390389I have one of these stoves, and the gap is well under one mm.
I use MSR canisters, and have had no issues.
May 27, 2007 at 6:14 am #1390394>>Both of you are using Snow Peak canisters, so now I'm curious as to why? Is it because of weight, price, performance, availability ???
Paul, in my case, the issue is mostly availability and price. The Snowpeak 110g canisters are the cheapest ($3) at the Denver REI flagship store which is twenty minutes down the bike path from my home. The weight and size are nice bonuses. I haven't conducted any performance tests on the various canisters so that one remains a question mark for me. The 110g size works because most of my trips are for four nights or fewer.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.