Topic
GoLite Jam2 Backpack REVIEW
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Campfire › Editor’s Roundtable › GoLite Jam2 Backpack REVIEW
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Feb 6, 2007 at 8:42 pm #1221679
Companion forum thread to:
Feb 7, 2007 at 3:13 am #1377403Those compression straps are long.
Could a pad, like the GG NightLight Pad (sectioned torso-length or longer), or the Z-Rest (Z-lite, y'all know which one – it's that orange one that folds accordion style) be placed on the back of the pack and the compression straps brought around the BACK (instead of the FRONT like in the pics to compact the pack) to hold the Pad in place. If so, this would provide mega-cushioning to the wearer's back (it might NOT be necessary with the Jam^2???), and would free up pack volume if the user is NOT forming a v-frame by making a larger cylinder out of their sleep pad.
If i understood the Review, buckle gender won't be an issue here as it's essentially no different than when forming the Kompactor system, i.e. the straps still need to cross over and attach to the other side. The question here is, "Will they reach?"
Just a thought. Anyone have one of these packs & can comment.
Feb 7, 2007 at 4:07 pm #1377493I wonder why the bottom of the pack still has the same fabric as the sides and top? I've done a lot of bushwhacking with an older GoLite pack (the Gust), and have had to replace the bottom three times when it developed enormous holes. This looks like a similar fabric to me. If they're targeting a crowd who wants a little more durability, they might add a couple ounces and put heavier fabric where it's needed.
Also, the shower test makes a nice picture, but it'd be more useful after the pack's been beat around for a month or two. Most backpacks come with some sort of water-resistance that looks good when it's new, but is precisely useless as soon as the pack is used at all. Is this any different?
Feb 7, 2007 at 6:54 pm #1377527PJ, in reponse to your question about the compression straps reaching around the back of the pack, I tried it with a NightLight pad and they are just too short. The pack would have to be half full thickness-wise and the backpanel pad removed for them to connect. The gender doesn't match in that direction either, so its a matter of one side connecting to the other, rather than connecting in the middle.
However, one could rig up an extension strap, with the correct genders, to connect the straps in the middle on the or back of the pack.
Hope this helps. Will
Feb 7, 2007 at 9:09 pm #1377547I can't imagine why they would replace the excellent tool retention Velcros with bungees. I'm at a loss to understand why they dropped the short daisy chain in the center which was perfect for crampons. I know this pack appears in their backpacking section and not their Alpine section but it is a great Alpine pack.
The compression system looks like a significant improvement. Do the side pockets accommodate insulators for water bottles better than the Jam 1?
The real winner in the series looks like the Pinnacle which solves all the shortcomings of the Gust which I no longer use. I suspect I'll be getting one of these. A review please? Thanks
Feb 7, 2007 at 9:19 pm #1377550Did I just see a picture of Will's ass?
Feb 7, 2007 at 9:36 pm #1377552Will has taken "clothing worn to a new level.
Feb 8, 2007 at 2:21 am #1377567Will, i realized that they won't connect together as you had made that clear in your excellent Review. I was hoping that since they were long enough to Kompact around the front, that they might reach around the back. Your idea of an extension strap sounds good, but maybe the whole idea is unecessary if the Jam^2 already has nice back padding.
Feb 8, 2007 at 9:22 am #1377604AnonymousInactiveI expected the hip wings to be longer judging from the pictures seen before I ordered the pack. After receiving my Jam2 I inquired of GoLite and it confirmed that the hip wings were shortened on the production pack because an evaluator had complained that they were too long. I can see where a high energy 18 year old evaluator with a 28” waist may want a smaller hip belt, but what about some of us (I recognize I may be alone here) older folks with a wider girth? GoLite also said that the wing length is the same on all sizes.
It never occurred to me that the compression straps might be used to wrap around the front of the pack but now that it has been raised, I experienced this problem on a pack several years ago and my wife solved it by sewing added lengths of strap which worked fine. Yes, I too miss the daisy chain which I am use to on the Trek. All things considered though, I really like this pack and look forward to carrying it.
Feb 13, 2007 at 12:34 pm #1378316I love my old Jam backpack. I think it is the best combination of lightweight and durability. I don't use it in winter due to what I feel is the weight carrying threshold that is limited by the rather meager design of the shoulder straps. The new Jam2 model seams to have upgraded this feature which probably makes it the perfect pack IMHO.
I too regret the loss of the daisy chain loops which I use extensively for everything from a clothes line to attaching my crocs. Please put them back GoLite!
Feb 13, 2007 at 7:35 pm #1378379Oh, my! Will, why are you wearing a hat for … you're in the shower! Great review though!
Feb 17, 2007 at 5:09 pm #1378972He's wearing a BACKPACK– what's the big deal about a hat after that? :)
I use a lawn sprinkler to test packs and tents. I hang the pack on a patio chair and avoid such ordeals– and public humilation. My neighbor has asked what kind of fertilizer I prefer with hiking gear. I told him that was a marketing issue :)
I use a Jam and like it, but a little more space wouldn't bother me– especially for winter clothes.
Mar 11, 2008 at 1:54 am #1423839i've had my eye on this pack for a while now, and for upcoming travels to australia and new zealand. once arriving in new zealand, i'll be doing a few four day treks with my brother who will help share the load. in between each trek, laundry is on the agenda, as well as getting to the next trek.
i'm having trouble deciding between this pack and the gregory z55. though the gregory isn't as light, it's very comfortable. two very different packs, i realize, but thought i'd get an idea here. if the golite had the suspension of the gregory, i'd be sold immediately. are there other options from different brands that are a better bet?
Mar 11, 2008 at 2:43 am #1423841whilst in New Zealand buy an Aarn body pack http://www.aarnpacks.com. Different again but scientifically more efficient
Mar 11, 2008 at 1:46 pm #1423916Are you planning on mainly staying in huts, or tarping/tenting? Makes a difference to the volume you may need…in other words, if you're just doing some of the "Great Walks" and staying in the huts, you won't need to carry shelter, mat or stove. It's the ultimate in UL if you don't mind the company and cost!
May 23, 2009 at 11:11 pm #1503194You know you're hardcore ultralight when tossing on a pair of boxers for a public photo shoot is too heavy :)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.