Topic

Tetrahedron vs Pyramid tents for MYOG


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Make Your Own Gear Tetrahedron vs Pyramid tents for MYOG

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1277255
    al b
    BPL Member

    @ahbradley

    I wondered why there are several pyramid tarp/tents but no tetrahedron style tarp/tents (one less side, so perhaps lighter/less sewing).

    The pole could be biased to the narrow end (ie made from unequal triangles).

    http://www.learner.org/interactives/geometry/print_tetrahedron.html

    #1763538
    Jerry Adams
    BPL Member

    @retiredjerry

    Locale: Oregon and Washington

    You need maybe a 3 x 7 feet area for a person to sleep on

    If you have a rectangular base tent you can more easily allocate 3 x 7 foot areas for people

    But, I suppose you could have two people with their feet at one triangle point

    I wonder if it would be lighter? Probably a little.

    When you set up a pyramid, you have to eyeball that the base is square, or two of the ridges will be slack, with tetrahedron you wouldn't have that problem. Also, if the four corners of the pyramid aren't all on the same plane, then the tent doesn't set up right, with a tetrahedron you wouldn't have that problem – sort of like a three legged stool doesn't rock.

    #1763645
    Kevin Beeden
    BPL Member

    @captain_paranoia

    Locale: UK

    A three-sided structure provides a poorer use of material for available volume than one with four sides.

    I once considered the optimal shape for sidewall weight vs grate area for a wood burner (i.e. 3 sides, four sides, 5 sides…). It turns out that it's a circular grate/sidewall plan (i.e. an infinite number of 'sides')…

    #1763682
    Tohru Ohnuki
    Member

    @erdferkel

    Locale: S. California

    "A three-sided structure provides a poorer use of material for available volume than one with four sides.

    I once considered the optimal shape for sidewall weight vs grate area for a wood burner (i.e. 3 sides, four sides, 5 sides…). It turns out that it's a circular grate/sidewall plan (i.e. an infinite number of 'sides')…"

    So a yurt is best… Hmm, how to make a UL yurt…

    #1763683
    David Olsen
    Spectator

    @oware

    Locale: Steptoe Butte

    bigwallshelterstuffsack

    Made this one for Dean Potter. single point suspension, toss your climbing gear in the
    corners to guy it out. Very quick to set up. To be used on a ledge.

    Also there is volume and their is usable volume. If sleeping people were yurt shaped, (no offense to those who might be) then a yurt shape would make sense. When you increase
    the number of sides you also make a correct set up more difficult if it is a floorless
    shelter. Things go all pear shaped.

    #1763688
    David Olsen
    Spectator

    @oware

    Locale: Steptoe Butte

    I also once had a 3 sided mid made by mistake. Someone out there bought and then resold it on bpl and posted pictures. It was olive colored. Maybe they might comment on how it has worked for them.

    #1763950
    Drop Bear
    BPL Member

    @dropbear

    #1763962
    Kevin Beeden
    BPL Member

    @captain_paranoia

    Locale: UK

    > So a yurt is best… Hmm, how to make a UL yurt…

    > Things go all pear shaped.

    There is, of course, a big difference between the requirements for a wood stove grate and for a shelter…

    On the other hand, if you look at a pear shape, it's actually quite a good representation of the optimal shape for a human shelter. Provided your upper body is at the fat end. The thin part of the pear accommodates the legs, and the fatter part allows room to move the arms about, and generally do stuff…

    ;-)

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Loading...