Topic
Ultralight Adventure Equipment (ULA) CDT Backpack Review
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Campfire › Editor’s Roundtable › Ultralight Adventure Equipment (ULA) CDT Backpack Review
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 31, 2011 at 1:40 pm #1274702
Companion forum thread to:
Jun 1, 2011 at 5:13 am #1743509I have always been a fan of this pack. My wife has used her conduit for years and never had a complaint. A year back I bought one and while I loved it, I ended up selling it due to the short sizing. I am 6'4" and found the same torso sizing issue as Will.
Jun 1, 2011 at 7:47 am #1743545The new CDT appears to be in three sizes now – s,m,l. Will, do you know where the M/L pack you tested would 'fall' in this new sizing range? Thanks,
Jun 1, 2011 at 11:02 am #1743603I believe M/L refers to hipbelt size / back length.
I.e. the size of his hipbelt is M and the length of the back is L.
PS: Reading again the sizes he states as available it doesn't make sense to me at all. Either these packs have been differently sized before, unlike their other pack, or the author is mistaken with the data.
Jun 1, 2011 at 11:05 am #1743604Hi Tor – my CDT from 2010 was a M/L size. There were only two sizes at the time, one of which was small.
Jun 1, 2011 at 4:55 pm #1743721The website still shows the angled side pockets is there something im missing? and with the hand straps how does that take weight off of your shoulders when it is pulling on them?
Jun 1, 2011 at 5:37 pm #1743743I bought one a few weeks ago and it still has the angled pockets. I like being able to get my water bottle easily, but these do seem a little over the top in that regard.
Feb 5, 2013 at 10:45 pm #1951255I actually really like the angled mesh side pockets. When used with 1 litre platypus, they cradle them perfectly and can be removed and replaced easily while hiking. They stayed in the pockets very securely even while doing serious bushwhacking. I just made sure the bungie's were tight and the platys were deeply cradled in the pockets. I could see how other things might fall out though, especially a hard plastic water bottle.
Feb 7, 2013 at 7:37 pm #1952018I used to have a Conduit, which I think is now the CDT. The reason I got rid of it was the side pockets. I could keep a platy in it on flat easy trails, but hiking cross country going up and down canyon walls, they would not stay put no matter what I did. Perhaps they have changed them. When I contacted Brian Flankel (who was very nice BTW), he said the pockets were designed for the typical 16 oz water bottle, not the thicker ones like sports drinks, or for platys. I have not had good luck with mesh pockets on any brand pack.
ULA Conduit
Below are some side pockets that do work well, IMO.
This is a 64 ounce Gatorade bottle.
Two 64 ounce Gatorade bottles.
Two 1 liter platys.
1 liter platy. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.