Topic
Man Vs. Wild
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Campfire › On the Web › Man Vs. Wild
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jan 5, 2007 at 10:06 pm #1373206
"Bear is a show-off who is going to get a novice killed by showing some cool, entertaining TV without the novice having any real knowledge to see themselves through some of the obviously staged settings Bear shows up in. I'm not saying Bear doesn't have the background, but the format of his show is pretty dangerously limited in terms of passing on comprehensive knowledge." -Shawn Basil
I agree especially based on watching his Alps episode and his Moab desert canyon episode.
I much prefer watching Survivorman both because I find it more realistic and because I appreciate the fact that not only is the guy surviving, he is doing all of his own camera work (and hauling his own multiple cameras, tripods, tapes, and batteries) and still produces outstanding videography.
I don't object to Bear having a TV crew with him.
However, I especially admire Les "survivorman" Stroud's ability to get creative and oustanding shots when he is cold, exhausted, and hungry. When I am cold, exhausted, and hungry is when I'm least likely to even pull out my SLR.
ps I am watching Man v Wild right now (watching the moronic Moab canyon/desert episode where he hippity hops up slick canyon walls and umps off of rock faces).
Jan 6, 2007 at 5:26 am #1373229Could it be that Vlad Putin has found a way back into the Forums??? Or, is it the "Son of Vlad"??? [Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the Forums!]
Greyson, you hit the nail on the head, and to quote some advice my mother gave me when i was a wee laddie: "Leave that alone! Don't pick a scab it will get infected." Might be appropriate advice here. [Bearpaw, this comment isn't targeting your Post. IMO, your unique background and experience qualifies you to Post the words that you did. It's difficult to argue with someone who truly knows, from personal, first-hand experience like yours. Thanks for taking the risk of "drawing fire". "Corpsman Up!". They also would draw fire. You're in good company. Semper Fi.]
Jan 6, 2007 at 12:19 pm #1373258In the rockies episode, he ate that snake right by where he slept. An animal comes into camp because of that mistake and he got scared and bolted in the middle of the night. He admitted not having much bear expirience…lol.
Jan 6, 2007 at 1:14 pm #1373263Bear seems to always follow a gully to a stream, to a river, and to civilization.
What's everyone's opinion …. is this a good plan?
Jan 6, 2007 at 3:23 pm #1373279"Bear seems to always follow a gully to a stream, to a river, and to civilization.
What's everyone's opinion …. is this a good plan?"
A thought on this. In the massive majority of cases, it's very difficult to walk far in most civilized countries without hitting a road. Also in most cases, if you get lost, you still have some clue, maybe even a map, to give you an idea of where a trail or road might be, if you can only follow a somewhat straight line for a while.
I would gladly follow a trail or road before I would follow streams for one simple reason: blowdowns. Streams are arbitrarily (due to gravity) in the lowest portions of an area, and typically are choked with downed trees and brush, especially in areas with significant rains and floodplain issues. Also, a stream may wind back and forth on itself for 3 miles and over cover a half-mile straight-line distance. And I suspect the likelihood of reaching civilization, or at least reorienting yourself, is likely to be quicker via roads than by following rivers.
Lastly, it's often better to sit in one spot and conserve energy and tend to immediate survival needs, assuming folks are going to miss you reasonably soon versus tromping through an unknown area. However, this doesn't make for good television.
But if I were blindfolded and dropped in unknown territory with no clue where I was, I suppose following a river until I hit a road would make reasonable sense.
Jan 6, 2007 at 3:31 pm #1373282Following a river was something that was done a long, long time ago. Villages were often built near rivers (generally beyond reasonable flood level). The chances of running into civilization was more likely by following a river (but would they be friendly???). Not sure of its applicability today.
Jan 6, 2007 at 3:37 pm #1373284"Corpsman Up!". They also would draw fire. You're in good company. Semper Fi."
PJ, should I take it you were a greenside doc? Corpsmen were some of the most loyal, brave, and resourceful folks I've ever been priviledged to know.
Jan 6, 2007 at 3:54 pm #1373289Resourceful? Dang straight! I was taught one of the first emergency tracheotomies was performed by a Navy Corpsman using a fountain pen bladder (though I can't verify this). Brave? Most decorated rating in the US Armed Forces (according to Wikipedia article on Corpsmen). And frankly, they're all wonderful, intelligent, and incredibly good looking!
Tom
Former HM3/USN
(blueside only unfortunately)Jan 6, 2007 at 7:02 pm #1373318>What's everyone's opinion …. is this a good plan?
I think if you sat down and had a cup of tea you could come up with a better plan. Where I hike streambeds are the roughest terrain, and are often impassible or worse. I'd rather head for a ridgeline where I might get a view.
Jan 6, 2007 at 7:46 pm #1373324>What's everyone's opinion …. is this a good plan?
""Always" is pretty broad for a criterion", the lawyer told me. (bd?)
If you need water or food, following the stream or stream bed is likely a better approach than wander on the top or side of a hill.
If you want to attract attention, be it via shouting, waving, signal mirror, smoke, cell, sat phone or most any other method, the high ground offers distinct advantages.
MikeB
Jan 6, 2007 at 10:52 pm #1373344I'm sorry but the person with the screen name "you suck" has a point. Hey buddy, the guy who spent 10 years in the Marines. I have spent longer with forest recon and Bear is doing nothing wrong. He is not a show off and his things are not staged. Have any of you backpackers actually have gone to Discovery.com and read anything about him? Have you actually read anything about the man? Also, Greyson Howard why don't you be professional or act like a man when debating with someone? There are always two sides to a story. Stop throwing personal insults at somebody you don't even know man. You sound like a liberal. Especially with your real name posted in the forum. You might want to watch what you type. The same goes for the guy with the dwarf from lord of the rings. Were all men here. Let people voice their opinions. Msgt R.
Jan 7, 2007 at 5:03 am #1373354You spent 10 years with Forest Recon? That's funny, because I always heard it as Force Recon. I knew a couple Force Recon Docs, so I figure I got it right. However, our Marine friend here will know for certain. Yet somehow, I think our "you suck" friend posted again. I might be wrong though.
The guy from Man vs. Wild might know a thing or two, sure. However, he also does stupid stuff that could get the rank and file person killed.
Tom
Jan 7, 2007 at 7:41 am #1373357Forest Recon? No such thing. You would know that if spent even a day in the Marines. For that matter, you would know that if you typed in "Forest Recon" in a google search. First rule to being a liar – make sure your lies have at least the air of believability. Who are you trying to kid, kid? Go troll elsewhere.
Jan 7, 2007 at 9:09 am #1373364Hey, give the guy(s) a break. Who said it was in the Marines? Besides, you ***can*** make $9.50 an hour in "Forest Recon", in Wisconsin, October – March.
See: http://www.nelson.wisc.edu/grad/careers/ejo/september/ejo912.htm"Effort includes: Updating the Forest Recon records, reinventory all stands with data older than 15 years or planned for harvest in the next ten years, process recon changes. " You might need a parka or 2.
Sounds like a great job for YS.I wonder, are the IP posting addresses of YS and John Rather possibly the same? ;)
MikeB
Jan 7, 2007 at 9:44 am #1373370I wonder if that $9.50 comes with the Master Sergeant rank?
Naw… the rank probably came out of a cracker jack box.
Jan 7, 2007 at 9:50 am #1373372I know it's fun to poke holes in a troller's post, but you are just adding fuel to the flame. Ignoring this type of poster is the only way to get them to go away.
Jan 7, 2007 at 10:04 am #1373377I didn't choose the path of serving this great country with military service, but I have had the distinct pleasure of being able to lead former servicemen in the civilian sector.
One thing that I've found is that former servicemen have no problem telling you their opinion, but it's always from a very respectful, fact centered, well thought out position and never from an emotional viewpoint.
The thought that "you suck" would have actually served our country is an insult to all of those who sacrificed their time, their energy, and possibly even their lives for the freedom that he abuses by trolling here in this forum. To pretend to have held the honorable title of US serviceman is an insult to the entire US and all of it's citizens.
My compliments to those of you that served to help protect my family and my freedom …. some of us more than appreciate what you've done for us.
Jan 7, 2007 at 10:57 am #1373390Hartford, WI is just North of Milwaukee. It's a nice place but it certainly ain't the Northwoods of Wisconsin. it's right off of 60… I drive through there on a regular basis.
Jan 7, 2007 at 11:19 am #1373396Here Here Mr. Henley! You said it very well! I'd even go so far to say the vast majority of us appreciate their efforts.
Jan 7, 2007 at 9:27 pm #1373484Yep… I was a Space Shuttle Door Gunner… so there! ;-)
Feb 22, 2007 at 1:14 am #1379593Seriously, I got hooked on the show, watched 6 episodes in 2 days, and I can't stop thinking about it. It's one of those "suspend your disbelief" things.
Feb 22, 2007 at 1:50 am #1379598edited; no point in feeding the trolls
Feb 22, 2007 at 7:54 pm #1379726Backtracking to the question of stream vs. ridgline, I think it is often possible to do both simultaneously. Usually streams and rivers carve a valley down the hill, with a ridge on each side. By walking on top of one of the ridges, you avoid ankle-stessing sidehilling, you avoid all the growth and fallen trees and rocky waterfalls at the bottom of the canyon, yet you stay close to the water of the stream. And, the stream may meander, but you won't end up walking in circles.
Feb 23, 2007 at 1:55 am #1379751In Maine they sometimes say "Ya cann't get the'ere from he're".
So, it is with a ridge to a stream. Make sure one examines the countour lines of the topo map, or is a skiled climber with all the necessary equipment. Five hundred feet down over 50' or so, for example, makes for quite a descent.
Just one other facet to the puzzle.
Feb 23, 2007 at 5:09 pm #1379826I don't consider the dense forests of New England part of what I call "the civilized wilderness." You barbarians can bash around in your Devil-cursed woods, ski on ice instead of snow, etc.,etc., but a truly civilized and enlightened Homo sapien sapien does most of his woodsy activities in the Sierra Navada, as did John Muir. The Sierras range is the "Range of Light," New England is the home of witches. We are grown adults out here, and I don't hear anything you say, Na, Na, Na, Na, Na.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.