Topic
Confused on sleeping bags ratings and weight
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Confused on sleeping bags ratings and weight
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Sep 19, 2005 at 7:56 pm #1216809
I’m looking for a 15 – 25 F lightweight down bag. I also will purchase a sleeping pad, but I’m confused on the high variability on weight for similar down bags: Is the weight of 650 fill down that much different than 775 or 900? How is it that a Wicked Fast or Marmot Hydrogen weighs 1/2 to 1 lb less than some similar (to this neophyte)bags? What am I giving up, is the shell much thinner or easier to rip?
Is there a good tutorial on this?Thanks,
MikeSep 19, 2005 at 8:56 pm #1341811The higher the “fill power” of the down, the less is needed to achieve a given warmth. Thus, everything else being equal, a 900fp bag will be more efficient — and ligher weight — than a 600fp bag. What are you giving up when you buy a high fp, ultra lightweight bag? Moolah — and lots of it!
This REI website has good info. on choosing a sleeping bag:
Finally — an important caution! There is no standard for temperature rating. Warmth is subjective. Also, gear makers all assign their own ratings. Many are “optimistic” with their ratings — you may freeze if you take them too literally.
Western Mountaineering, Montbell, Golite — and REI (more or less) — are pretty honest.
Sep 19, 2005 at 9:00 pm #1341813While reading and analyzing on your own, you might also want to describe your type of hiking/camping (e.g. car camping or backpacking, three season or four season, etc.), your height and weight, how heavy of a pack you want to lug, and (of course) your budget — and folks will gladly give you their recommendations.
Sep 19, 2005 at 9:07 pm #1341814Benjamin hit it on the nose. No need to add more to this.
Sep 19, 2005 at 10:15 pm #1341817If you compare one of the lightest bags to a bag that’s a pound heavier but has the same temp rating and is from the same company, these are some things you may notice: The hood is smaller or even missing, there are fewer draft tubes / drawstrings, the zipper extends only halfway down the bag, the bag fits more tightly (and sometimes the ‘regular’ size only fits up to 5’10” instead of 6′), the insulation is lighter (this is fill power), the fabric is lighter (sometimes the weight of the fabric is given in ounces per square foot). I think the weight difference between otherwise identical 800 and 900 fill power bags will be negligible. This thread claims that at least part of the difference between 800 and 900 down is simply the measuring technique used.
Sep 21, 2005 at 2:27 am #1341855I bought a Wicked Fast bag this year and have used it for the season in Europe.The rating is way out.This is not a 0 degrees celcius bag.Check out some European web sites and look for the EN test, comfort figure for the rating you are looking for. Also if you look at the Mammut catalog, i don’t know if they have it on there web site, but they are finding durability problems with 800 and higher loft down.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Garage Grown Gear 2024 Holiday Sale Nov 25 to Dec 2:
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.