Topic
2008 LuxuryLite Big Survival Stik Walking Staff REVIEW
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Campfire › Editor’s Roundtable › 2008 LuxuryLite Big Survival Stik Walking Staff REVIEW
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Feb 20, 2008 at 1:32 am #1227379
Companion forum thread to:
Feb 20, 2008 at 2:45 am #1421213thanks doug for the lovely demo on the trail defense system
Feb 20, 2008 at 6:22 am #1421227With the Stik and wearing an OR Ninjaclava, you'd be set for night stealth missions on the trail.
Feb 20, 2008 at 6:32 am #1421230oh man, that video is classic. Thanks for the laugh…
Feb 20, 2008 at 9:29 am #1421250Will the knife section of the staff function as a trowel? It looks like it would work well, any trials? I have the need to poo more often than defend myself from animals! ;)
Feb 20, 2008 at 10:25 am #1421264Brill video! funny!
Yer looks like it would be better used as a troul than a knife, and there ant much of killer animals here in the uk!
But those ninjas are scary!Like to try one out myself as i dont allways use trekking poles.
Anyone else used stafs on the trail??
Or Prefer them to poles??Feb 20, 2008 at 11:19 am #1421270How about a barbed fork so it can be used to spear fish?
Feb 20, 2008 at 1:30 pm #1421290I have one of these. The tolerances are pretty tight. I think if the knife was used as a trowel it would quickly develop burrs and/or get gunked up to the point that it couldn't be inserted in the handle, or would bind if it did. Mine is getting this way just due to its age.
Feb 20, 2008 at 1:56 pm #1421298Oh my, Doug.
I'm speechless.
Don
Feb 20, 2008 at 2:14 pm #1421302Now we will have to see more videos from you Doug! LOL! Great review with a funny twist! he he
Feb 20, 2008 at 3:57 pm #1421319there are now ferral wild boar now in uk
these have attacked people!
traditionally (norman times) a spear was used
to kill boar, by putting ones foot on blunt end
of spear and pointing the sharp end towards
the chest of the charging boar. good luck
llew-oswestry, ukFeb 20, 2008 at 4:20 pm #1421328>I have one of these. The tolerances are pretty tight. I think if the knife was used as a trowel it would quickly develop burrs and/or get gunked up to the point that it couldn't be inserted in the handle, or would bind if it did. Mine is getting this way just due to its age.<
Thanks! That's what I was wondering.
Feb 20, 2008 at 5:48 pm #1421346Perfect for keeping the droogies in their place, Clockwork Orange style.
Feb 20, 2008 at 6:49 pm #1421355Hi Ryan,
I agree with Dean. I did use it for a trowel and it worked great but it got pretty gunked up. I don't think this is the ideal tool for that job.
However, I found that in our loose Northwest soil that the pole itself was stiff enough to dig a pit. I'm not sure about all soils but the poles was really good for that.
Cheers,
DougFeb 20, 2008 at 6:51 pm #1421356Thanks everyone! This was defnitely the most fun review I've done- making that video was a blast! You should see the outtakes!
I'm excited for the possibility of more video on BackpackingLight. I'm sure you'll see more in the future (whether they will include trail ninjas or not is another story!)
Have a good one!
DougFeb 20, 2008 at 9:45 pm #1421376I was pleased to see that the walking staff, or what used to be called an alpenstock, is still around. My old hickory one has seen considerable service over the years and even deterred an aggressive raccoon once.
What I was most pleased about, however, was the lack of a big pointy spike on the end that is commonly found on hiking poles. Somehow, seeing a trail perforated by a gazillion little holes, then tilled up, then eroded away by rain just grates my sesibilities about the Leave No Trace (LNT) ethic that we're all suppossed to be aware of. I put a rubber cap (for canes) that can be had at any drug store on mine, and not only does it not encourage trail erosion, but it has a grip on rock superior to that of a steel spike.
Feb 21, 2008 at 12:52 am #1421386I have one of the earlier models of the LL walking staff and I love it, think it's now 3-4 years old and still going strong…can't remember when I purchased it but I still haven't broken it!!!
Dimensions are
1/ pole diameter 1/2inch (1.2cm),
2/ pole length 64inches (160cm)
3/ pole weight 5.5oz
4/ same prussik cord
5/ breaks down into x3 sections longest being 26inches (65cm)Things I like
1/ Breaks down into a manageable size for travelling…..can put into or onto my pack when transiting esp on air flights….
2/ Extra length works well when going down steep inclines………move the prussik handle higher up the pole for better ergonomic action
4/ Extra length works well with some shelter set ups………i.e BD Megalite Shelter for the central pole. The pole breaks down to use it with shelters that need a lesser pole height
5/ Seems to have the strength to support full bodyweight……..I've lost my balance a many times and had to put my full bodyweight on the pole and while it bent and bent it didn't break. However I'm always conscious of the top end of the pole spearing into me if I fell or it collapsed and have put a rubber cap on the top end of the pole……..weight gain of .5oz. I use a cap that usually goes over the end of trekking poles.The hollow aluminium end does collect some dirt, but I've now combined that with expoy and closed the end so it doesn't collect new dirt to cross contaminate the areas I'm travelling. The aluminium end piece has good grip on all surfaces and after 3-4 years does not show excessive wear i.e. decrease in usable length
I agree with previous posts that when using the LL pole I do not walk as fast as when I'm using my Gossamer Gear Lightreks (5.5oz for the pair). I still walk faster and more comfortably with either than using nothing, plus I have my shelter pole/poles thus multi tasking…..an essential for lightweight trekking
I think LL weakened when discontinuing my model pole and went with the big brother model…………..now they should be called…….Moderately Lite
Feb 21, 2008 at 6:01 am #1421393"I think LL weakened when discontinuing my model pole and went with the big brother model…………..now they should be called…….Moderately Lite"
TiGoat, unfortunately, discontinued their CF Staffs as well. They had a shorter, smaller diameter one as well… IIRC, the main difference between TiGoat and LL is that the TiGoats were lighter and non-collapsible…
Feb 21, 2008 at 6:25 am #1421394I would think that some jurisdictions would consider this a concealed weapon of the cane sword type.
Feb 21, 2008 at 5:10 pm #1421464Greetings Doug. Kudos for another example of what we've come to expect from BPL reviews: Factually correct, Informative and Entertaining. Good Job!
A personal note: I do *not* have *any* vested interest in re LuxuryLite. Over the years I have purchased, used and abused, almost every product LL have ever made available to General Public. And a few not available to the GP. ;-) I am what most would call a "loyal customer." But I am not biased and I have disagreed strongly w/Bruce on more than one occasion. But I do like and respect the man and the staff @LL.
WTS, I am indeed an expert when it comes to backpacking in general and LL gear in particular. So I do hope this post helps clarify, inform and entertain. The latter is doubtful; i'm not as good a writer as you are Doug.
First some subjective ops:
1) Doug Johnson wrote; "Hand strap is comfortable for all-day treks." "… although this is not a trekking pole." "Then, again, this is not a trekking pole and it serves a slightly different purpose." "… trekking poles … [are] more efficient when making direct ascents …"
I disagree that the Stik is not a trekking pole. In fact you kinda/sorta disagreed w/yourself. As quoted in the first sentence above.
1a) What is a trekking pole? A pole one uses while trekking. Duh! So, Doug this *is* a trekking pole.
1b) I also disagree that the Stik is less efficient during ascents. The stability and ruggedness afforded by Stiks is unmatched (as you wrote)! And during descents, when (IMEO) the worst slips occur …. well, there's none better, if fitted w/a standard basket/tip!
1c) The *one handed,* on the fly, adjustability afforded by the prussik strap on the Stik is True Bleeding Genius! Specially on ascents/descents and hilly terrain in general. IMEO it is *the one* attribute which sets the Stiks apart from the rest.
Think how often one foregoes the *security* and convenience of properly adjusting a standard trekking pole because it's a PITA to stop in the middle of a descent and lengthen one's trekking pole. Even Flicklocks are usually used as "set and forget" due to the hassle. The prussik strap also allows quick and easy secure hanging of a multitude of items; including one's pack. And there's more …. for another post. ;-)
2) You noted that the cylindrical tips are not as positive as standard tips. I agree. Which is why on my Stiks I have two complete sets of tips and baskets. One I made myself out of LL sourced parts. And one, slightly larger, set which Bruce made later for me. They Work Great! I highly recommend them.
3) You're not impressed w/the "Needle" and think it just adds weight. Fair enough. I use it often and think that the "Needle" is good enough to replace the 1.2 ounce trowel I used to carry. Ergo: No need for an additional item …. adding more weight than reasonable alternatives. The Needle saved me app one ounce of weight. So, works for me. :-)
4) You rightly mention that the Stik is not suitable for all shelters. Which, as noted, applies to all trekking poles. ;-)
But what you may not be aware of is that different Stik section lengths may be ordered. Or one could simply cut a section(s) to whatever length one prefers. The latter is of course not an option w/standard design trekking poles.
Which brings me to your comparisons ….
5) While it is very useful to compare products one must always keep in mind (*I* think you did, but others?) that apples and oranges have different attributes.
The Stiks, like most other LL products over the years, are a Modular Concept! And they come from an MFG who is willing to build to suit. While they are heavier than UL poles, the additional weight is mitigated by the far greater degree of utility (more in that re during an upcoming followup post) and the utter reliability.
The Stiks won't let you down !
You might also not be aware of the fact that the first carbon fiber "Stiks" that LL built and sold, were much, much lighter. I still have two of them which I use for "Fast & Light" hikes. With LL baskets/tips. And custom sections to fit practically every UL shelter made.
If you want lighter …. LuxuyLite will build them!
If you want baskets/tips …. LuxuryLite will build them!
Like any great inventor, innovator and entrepreneur; Bruce wants to make what people want to buy!
Contact Bruce and annoy the heck out of him. Because I have a number of Lekis (rental/loaners) that i'd like to replace w/original, small diameter, CF Stiks. And the two I have left, although rugged and although they will still provide years of service …. they are pretty old.
BTW, Since I don't speak for LL take my ops as being strictly personal. TIA for your understanding!
Finally , of course LL products are not for everybody. But like other unique products they absolutely require a paradigm shift to fully appreciate their positive qualities. IOW; it may take a bit of time to learn how make the best use of them. Fortunately LL have one of the best satisfaction guarantees in the biz!
Thx for reading this long winded post. :-)
Peace,
Richard.
Feb 21, 2008 at 5:15 pm #1421467All trowels become "gunked up" and require cleaning. All trekking poles require maintenance.
A few minutes w/a nylon kitchen scrub pad. Some wet sanding of any burrs etc, and Voila …. as good as new.
The above are simply not options on any other trekking poles.
E.g. ever clean a set of Super Makalus?
Or try to dig a "cathole" with them? ;-)
Peace,
Richard.
Feb 21, 2008 at 5:53 pm #1421472Hi Richard,
Thanks for the great feedback. Here are my responses to your points.
1) Trekking poles and effeciency portion
dj: This is different than a trekking pole but that depends on your definition I suppose. For most, trekking poles mean 2 poles with grips that are sized more along the lines of ski poles. But if you define trekking poles as you did, then all poles will be trekking poles including PacerPoles, ski poles, wooden walking staffs, canes, etc. My point here was that this pole is different than almost all "trekking poles" on the market.
Stiffness is not the only mark of effeciency. A second pole adds a lot to effeciency and a lighter weight increases that as well. If you're using two, then that is a very heavy setup and that alone will decrease your effeciency.
I agree with you that the strap is a fantastic idea and works very well. I also agree that a standard tip that reduces slip is more effecient.
2) You noted that the cylindrical tips are not as positive as standard tips. I agree. Which is why on my Stiks I have two complete sets of tips and baskets. One I made myself out of LL sourced parts. And one, slightly larger, set which Bruce made later for me. They Work Great! I highly recommend them.
dj: Cool- these aren't available on the LuxuryLite site but they sound like a good idea.
3) You're not impressed w/the "Needle" and think it just adds weight. Fair enough. I use it often and think that the "Needle" is good enough to replace the 1.2 ounce trowel I used to carry. Ergo: No need for an additional item …. adding more weight than reasonable alternatives. The Needle saved me app one ounce of weight. So, works for me. :-)
dj: Very cool- there's discussion on this above. I found that it clogged with mud somewhat when digging but it can certainly be useful for this purpose.
4) You rightly mention that the Stik is not suitable for all shelters. Which, as noted, applies to all trekking poles. ;-)
dj: Absolutely- this is true for all fixed length poles. The lack of a pointed tip means that it has fewer options than most "trekking poles", however. It would be very difficult to use this pole with a Tarptent, for example.
But what you may not be aware of is that different Stik section lengths may be ordered. Or one could simply cut a section(s) to whatever length one prefers. The latter is of course not an option w/standard design trekking poles.
dj: Two different models are shown on the LuxuryLite website but custom lengths are not an option. Good to know that customization is possible (a variety of lengths are common in all fixed length poles on the market that I've come across as well.)
5) While it is very useful to compare products one must always keep in mind (*I* think you did, but others?) that apples and oranges have different attributes.
dj: This is PRECISELY why I attempted to show that this is a different product than typical trekking poles. Comparing this pole to say, a Gossamer Gear Lightrek 3 would be a poor choice. Comparing it to a wood hiking staff seems a better choice, which is why I made that comparision.
The Stiks, like most other LL products over the years, are a Modular Concept! And they come from an MFG who is willing to build to suit. While they are heavier than UL poles, the additional weight is mitigated by the far greater degree of utility (more in that re during an upcoming followup post) and the utter reliability. The Stiks won't let you down !
dj: Agreed. These are super bomber (as shown in my review). This is the second LuxuryLite product I have personally reviewed for this site and I also agree that their workmanship is excellent. I'm not sure that the "greater utility" is worth the additional weight for all hikers but for many, especially those that prefer a walking staff to trekking poles, the Stik will be a great choice (notice the recommended rating).
You might also not be aware of the fact that the first carbon fiber "Stiks" that LL built and sold, were much, much lighter. I still have two of them which I use for "Fast & Light" hikes. With LL baskets/tips. And custom sections to fit practically every UL shelter made. If you want lighter …. LuxuyLite will build them! If you want baskets/tips …. LuxuryLite will build them! Like any great inventor, innovator and entrepreneur; Bruce wants to make what people want to buy!
dj: These options are great. However, we review items that are available for purchase and that are submitted to us for review. Thanks to Bruce and Luxurylite for taking part in our review process!
BTW, Since I don't speak for LL take my ops as being strictly personal. TIA for your understanding!
dj: all good, totally understood. Your opinions are appreciated and respected here! Peace to you too and happy hiking in whatever style you like!
Doug
Feb 23, 2008 at 11:14 pm #1421795"I would think that some jurisdictions would consider this a concealed weapon of the cane sword type."
It is in California. This item fits the Penal Code's definition of a "concealed dirk or dagger":
12020. (a) Any person in this state who does any
of the following is punishable by imprisonment in
a county jail not exceeding one year or in the
state prison:
(a)(4) Carries concealed upon his or her person any
dirk or dagger.
(c)(24) As used in this section, a
"dirk" or "dagger" means a knife or other
instrument with or without a handguard that is
capable of ready use as a stabbing weapon that
may inflict great bodily injury or death."Also farther down section 12020:
(15) As used in this section, a "cane sword" means a cane, swagger stick, stick, staff, rod, pole, umbrella, or similar device, having concealed within it a blade that may be used as a sword or stiletto.
(16) As used in this section, a "shobi-zue" means a staff, crutch, stick, rod, or pole concealing a knife or blade within it which may be exposed by a flip of the wrist or by a mechanical action.
In the real world, could you be arrested for possessing one of these? Possibly under certain circumstances. Would you do jail time? Probably not unless you have priors or you are a convicted felon. But you could face fines and probation. The wording of the section allows it to be filed as a felony by the D.A.
The fact that this product is marketed as "intimidating", "scary" and as a "weapon" would not help your case in court.
I think LL would be wise to feature a disclaimer about this on the website.
Feb 25, 2008 at 10:36 am #1422005I've been carrying a set of the original LL Trailsticks for 4 years. I don't see any need for the "pig sticker" option of the newer models. The only wild animals I ever really want to kill are those pesky squirrels that are trying to get into my food. I don't think a poky thing is the proper weapon for the little buggers. I do wish Bruce still made the original sticks. They're great.
I also carry an LL pack and love it. Bruce's guarantee is the best. He has repaired or replaced and even redesigned items for me.
My Avatar shows me with both the LL pack and sticks.
Feb 25, 2008 at 12:15 pm #1422014I also have one of the light (3-4oz?) small diameter LL poles and it is one of my favorite pieces of equipment.
It easily breaks down into section for trips on the airlines.
The following quote is so true and we should clamor to let the others manufactures know about it:
The *one handed,* on the fly, adjustability afforded by the prussik strap on the Stik is True Bleeding Genius! Specially on ascents/descents and hilly terrain in general. IMHO it is *the one* attribute which sets the Stiks apart from the rest. Think how often one foregoes the *security* and convenience of properly adjusting a standard trekking pole because it's a PITA to stop in the middle of a descent and lengthen one's trekking pole.
The strap does not slip even in the rain !
I also endorse the LL reasoning on the following from quotes the website:
However, the LuxuryLite design philosophy assumes the human body works best walking on two feet as much as possible with at least one arm free for balance. We see the purpose of a hiking pole as a temporary extra 'leg' on rocky or steep trail sections and slippery stream crossings.
Specifically this works great for me …
When using the Survival Stik on flat trails, slide the Prussik knot to the middle and carry the Survival Stik balanced horizontally while swinging your arms in a natural human gait that delivers the miles with natural balance and minimum fatigue.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.