Topic
Running shorts and wind pants vs convertible pants – Philmont
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
- This topic has 11 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 8 months ago by Tony Ronco.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jul 28, 2015 at 11:55 am #1331145
In the Sierra’s my daily wear is usually running shorts with wind pants should it get cool. I had planned on doing the same at Philmont but am wondering if going with the convertible pants is just a better solution given the conservation projects, horseback riding etc.
Am I just asking for torn up Montbell wind pants if I stick with them?
Any thoughts or experiences are appreciated.
Michael
Jul 28, 2015 at 12:11 pm #2217534Ive only been on one trek so there are large parts of the ranch I have not seen, but I did cover the whole range south (Rayado turn around) to north (Ponil). Also not familiar with those pants so dont know how fragile they are.
That said – trail-wise, I cannot imagine anything except a Valle Vidal cross country that would cause problems. Conservation project is probably the luck of the draw. We did trail work where we were in the brush a bit. Spar pole climbing could sure do some damage if that is on your itinerary.
Jul 30, 2015 at 9:42 am #2218055Thank you for the comments. Much appreciated!
Michael
Jul 30, 2015 at 12:23 pm #2218105Like Jay said, shorts are fine for all the hiking.
The events are where the convertible pants are needed. It depends on what you are planning on doing. I used my DriDucks rain pants one year for my long pants and used them for the conservation project. They were not good for that and got torn up.
I took convertible pants the other 2 times and think they are a better choice overall. If weight is a concern, there is a wide range of weights for convertible pants so be aware of that. You can find decent, lightweight convertible pants that can serve as your shorts so the only extra weight is the zip off portion.
I found that the zip offs were nice a few chilly evenings but wind pants would be fine for that too.
Jul 30, 2015 at 8:23 pm #2218218Thanks John.
I usually leave the convertible pants at home, but have a sneaking suspicion that they are the better choice given some of the activities. Both options are down in the garage sitting next to my bag. Need to put one in the bag in the next day or so – we leave Sunday.
Thanks – Michael
Jul 30, 2015 at 8:32 pm #2218219I think they require "pants" if you go on the horseback rides. If it isn't on your itenerary, than hike as comfortable as you can. You can always bring both to base camp and make a decision to leave one behind at that time. There might be more current advice from the Rangers that were not aware of.
Since I always hike in pants anyway, convertibles are my style. More durable and better spf than my exposed skin.
(I did bring my Montbell wind pants to act as rain pants. Never needed them once on our trek last year. )
Jul 31, 2015 at 4:53 pm #2218377On two different treks I've taken one pair of switchbacks, and one pair of running shorts. Has been a good 1-2 punch for me.
Aug 1, 2015 at 1:53 pm #2218467Thanks for all the comments. I'll bring the options just in case I change my mind in Base Camp, but I think I'll take the convertibles and throw in the running shorts (4.3oz) as sleep/extra. Not a huge weight penalty but I figure it will give me a good base to decide for future Philmont trips. 2 more sons yet to go.
My goal was to avoid the weight of the convertible pants vs. my shorts/wind pants at ~ 7.4oz. No need to be be weight obssesed – it is Philmont after all. I noticed a consitent thread of comments about the conservation projects : "wore my rain pants" and "tore them up." I figured the same would go for my wind pants so I'll err on the side of being conservative.
Thanks again for the comments.
Mar 8, 2016 at 2:15 am #3387517Question here. I was looking at different convertible pants for both men and women. Why are the women ones heavier and have smaller pockets and less room in the thigh for rock scrambling. I am still looking for a men’s pair that would would fit me. OR 32’s are too large.
Mar 8, 2016 at 11:26 am #3387590Liz and Royal Robbins started their company with a line of climbing clothes for women that were functional. You might check out their web site.
Mar 8, 2016 at 12:54 pm #3387609From what I remember (long pants needed) –
horse ride
conservation project
spar pole climbingThere may be something else, but I just don’t remember now.
May 1, 2016 at 9:27 pm #3399136To the OP’s original question:
During summer months I hike almost exclusively in shorts. I have been to Philmont twice, and both times i have used the trail running shorts with lightweight wind pants combo when long pants were needed.. Worked out fine for the Cons projects and horseback riding.
Note: I use a rain kilt so I I didn’t have rain pants as an option.
YMMV
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.