We received 312 photo submissions and were overwhelmed by the popularity of this contest with our readers. We’d like to offer a sincere thanks for all photographers who submitted photos, but due to the high number of submissions, we are unable to publish them all!
Our contest jury was comprised of seven Backpacking Light staff and members of our peer review committee, and included: Brian Barnes, Alan Dixon, Rick Dreher, Ryan Faulkner, Ryan Jordan, Mike Martin, and Don Wilson.
Photos were sent to jurors at 800 pixels on their longest side (unless they were submitted smaller) and blinded with respect to both captions and photographer identity during the scoring process.
Each juror selected thirty photos out of an initial pool of 312 entries. Then, thirty-three entries (which comprised those photos that were selected by at least four of the seven jurors) were assigned a score in each of the following categories:
- RELEVANCE – How well does this photo reflect the activities of hiking, backpacking, and camping, especially as it related to Backpacking Light’s Mission (multi-day, backcountry, self-supported, and lightweight)?
- ORIGINALITY – How well does this photograph reflect an original scene unlike anything else you’ve ever seen?
- TECHNICAL – How well does the photographer employ the appropriate technical photography skills to capture the image (exposure, depth of field, shutter speed, focus)?
- COLOR – How well does the photographer use color (or lack thereof) and natural lighting?
- AESTHETIC – How well does this photograph balance all of the above to elicit a "Wow!" factor when you look at the image?
Photos were given 1 to 3 points in each category:
- The photograph does not meet expectations for minimum criteria in this category.
- The photograph meets expectations for minimum criteria in this category.
- The photograph exceeds expectations for minimum criteria in this category.
Each juror also assigned what they believed to be the importance of each category with a relative weighting factor, and the final weighting scale resulted from an average of the individual weights assigned by all jurors. Thus, the categories were weighted as follows:
- Relevance – 23%
- Originality – 20%
- Technical – 17%
- Color – 13%
- Aesthetic – 27%
Finally, all photo scores were normalized on a scale of 1 (lowest) and 100 (highest), and ranked accordingly.
Prizes are awarded to the top three photographs, and we also recognize the thirteen photos that were scored in the final round.
Click on an image to open a larger version in the image gallery.
Grand Prize: Sean Mahoney (81.7 points)
- There were many stunning landscape photos submitted, but this one stands out for its saturated color and flawless composition that gives a sense of depth and perspective. The only thing missing is something to tie it more specifically to the activity of backpacking.
- Beautiful colors and exposure of a frequently photographed location. My only quibble is I would have like to see more of the landscape and sunset. Own a wider lens?
- HDR is a very appropriate technique for this scene – it brings out the color of the foreground nicely, but foreground saturation could be toned down ever so slightly to allow the viewer to focus on the rest of the image, which is beautiful.
Sean wins a lifetime membership to backpackinglight.com and a $100 gift certificate to the backpackinglight.com store.
Second Place: David Johnston (75.9 points).
- The sky is surreal and the photo is exposed very well (given the time of day). I like the panoramic crop but would trim both sides to the edges of the largest rocks to increase the emphasis of the focal points (granite and sky).
- Great use of long exposure to get the wispy clouds, but too much is competing as the primary subject, so a little cropping or reframing to minimize foreground and maximize the sky might be in order. I would have preferred more pronounced and darker sky, since the stars reveal that this is a night scene.
David wins a lifetime membership to backpackinglight.com and a $50 gift certificate to the backpackinglight.com store.
Third Place (tie): Casey Cardwell and Ed Huesers (75.0 points)
- Who doesn’t love slow shutter speeds and starry nights? The addition of an illuminated tent can only make it that much more pleasing. I like the soft glowing colors in the photo but to me it lacks sharpness and the shutter speed could have been lengthened. Additionally, inclusion of the North Star with the others rotating around it would enhance the sense of motion often felt by these types of photographs.
- This image skillfully captures the appeal of camping out at twilight with high technical marks for its long exposure. It might benefit from less contrast to show more detail.
- The exposure on the tent is too hot and I would have preferred either full star trails, or none at all (just stars), and a wider lens or walking a bit further back could have put a little useful space between the tent and right edge to prevent crowding, but the sky color is gorgeous and the mountain peak is illuminated effectively.
- A stunning landscape. The lighting and subdued foreground colors effectively set a tranquil mood. I’d prefer it to be a bit less dark to bring out more foreground detail, but not at the expense of altering the mood.
- Lovely colors, but this certainly is a difficult situation to get an ideal exposure. Improving the overall exposure (this one is a little too dark for my taste) and selectively brightening the mid-section of the photograph would do wonders for this magnificent scene. I would suggest stepping to the left to avoid inclusion of the bush in the bottom right, which in my opinion doesn’t add significantly to the photo.
- Increasing the exposure and bumping up global contrast and blacks during the digital development phase would brighten the scene, prevent the bush detail from busying up the image, and reveal the depth of color available.
Both Casey and Ed win a lifetime membership to backpackinglight.com.
- I enjoy the juxtaposition between the ship and the overloaded hiker with a metal framed pack – both which are slowly trudging along. The subtle tones of grays, blues, and tans are pleasing, but the tight cropping near the ship is a distraction.
- This may be the best image of our pool showing lightweight backpackers with lightweight gear in a beautiful setting. But the camera could have stepped back a few feet to avoid crowding the lower part of the frame, and reframed the scene so the remnant clouds weren’t confounding the composition. I like how the girl is gazing at the guy, while the guy is gazing at the mountain in the distance. Classic!
- Classic composition and use of black and white capture the essence of a stark Winter hike.
- This B&W’s tonality could be improved by increasing local contrast (clarity) just a bit to add some depth and separate the mountain horizon from the sky, and the two mountain ridges that cross each other. Composition is wonderful, with pleasing balance. I like how the hikers are walking up into the mountains.
- The foreground silhouette and vast pastel background work well to convey the the appeal of a hike in the Southwest. I don’t think the camera tilt adds to the composition.
- The creative use of a slanted horizon augments the sense of height and unbalance in this photograph. I equally enjoy the silhouette of the hiker, but find the illuminated rocks in the top left to be distracting. Cropping the left 20% off of this photo might improve it.
- I love the pastel look here, the contrast and color are reminiscent of great film instead of everything-looks-the-same-digital images. Tilted horizon is a great touch that reveals a sense of precariousness to the hiker’s position.
- I enjoyed this macro shot of a mosquito, especially the translucence of the silnylon and insect wings. I would have preferred the silhouette of the bug to be a bit more pronounced. Some visual interest is lost by placement of the subject dead center within the frame.
- A cold, tired hiker in front of a roaring camp fire speaks to a basic camping experience. The dramatic yellow color of the fire adds visual interest to the photo.
- Nice use of color, interesting framing, crop, and subject, but the overexposed sky behind the subject is a significant distracter. The use of HDR or a ND filter would improve this photo. In the absence of such tools (tripods, filters, etc) in the backcountry, repositioning the camera angle or exposing the image at sunset might improve this photo.
- Nice colors and subject matter but the image would be improved by a sharper focus and stepping beyond the bush on the left.
- This photo is a little busy and I’m glad for the contrasty film look of the image. Some days, I just get tired of tack sharp photos from digital cameras viewed on a computer screen. This one makes me feel good.
- Pleasing exposure and use of a slow shutter speed to augment the waterfall motion. I would have liked to have seen a bit more contrast and saturation in this image. A slightly tighter crop on the top would increase the focus on the waterfalls.
- Pretty colors, but the tonality seems a artificially warm. There’s nice greens in here, I would have liked to have seen them stand out a little. Waterfalls are generally boring, so this is a nice take, and the positioning of the foreground waterfall, the direction of its water flow, and where it lands, is just about perfect.
- I like the "story" that the photograph is telling, but the scattering of gear distracts the viewer from the main themes (campfire and subject). I’d prefer an even lower camera position, shooting up at the subject’s face rather than straight on. Technically this image could be improved by removing these optical distracters and improving the focus, saturation, and contrast.
- The framing of the scene might have been improved by walking a step here or there, fore or aft. I’m a little confused about what the subject is: the pot of food, or the hiker? In spite of the appearance that this is a LNT mess in the making, I like the girl’s bare feet and calm demeanor. It’s what hiking is all about. More smoke would have been cool. Contrast is nice, and I think this image’s simplicity could be enhanced by converting to B&W.
The number of outstanding images we received was extremely high. As you can see from the jurors’ selections above, the highest rated photos included those that offered a range of attributes that may or may not have included technical brilliance or perfect color. In fact, most jurors ranked overall aesthetic, originality, and relevance as higher criteria. Telling is the fact that these photos, which we felt possessed the most character, were taken with a wide variety of cameras from a high end DSLR to a compact and inferior quality waterproof camera. This reinforces the old adage that a bad camera in the hands of a good photographer will produce better pictures than a good camera in the hands of a bad photographer.
Happy snapping, on or off the trail!