Topic

Single skin mountain tents


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) Single skin mountain tents

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 30 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3396689
    Stefan Jacobsen
    Spectator

    @hrstefan

    I am interested in single skin tents for high altitude mountaineering.

    Some single skins are pretty waterproof but breathe poorly, some are merely windproof but breathe better. All suffer from condensation to varying degrees. However, some single skins have an inner surface which absorbs moisture preventing it from dripping down your face. If the temperature and outside humidity is in favor, the moisture will be conveyed to the outside by whatever mechanism the actual fabric supports. If not, it will stay on the inside, but not drip (so much).

    ToddTex is a well known fabric, which does exactly this – it is fuzzy on the inside, and it breathes. Now, the British tent maker Crux use a fabric, X-tex, which has activated carbon on the inside which should manage moisture in a similar way.

    If anyone here has experience with these kind of tents, maybe they will be able to answer a few questions:
    1) How waterproof is X-tex?
    2) How well does it breathe?
    3) How well does it manage moisture, preventing from dripping?

    Thanks

    #3396707
    Roger Caffin
    BPL Member

    @rcaffin

    Locale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe

    I have little faith, but I am interested.

    Cheers

     

    #3396722
    Tipi Walter
    BPL Member

    @tipiwalter

    When you google up Mt Everest tents you see mostly double wall tents.  I wonder why this is??

    https://www.google.com/search?q=mt+everest+tents&biw=1280&bih=839&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjzqZvTuJnMAhUF2yYKHdsIB-EQ_AUIBigB

    #3396723
    David L
    BPL Member

    @family-guy-2-2

    “I wonder why this is??”

    You mean the base camp tents?  Yeah – exactly the same thing.

    #3396726
    Roger Caffin
    BPL Member

    @rcaffin

    Locale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe

    “I wonder why this is??”

    Function, comfort, common sense … and a desire to stay dry inside?

    Cheers

     

    #3396729
    David L
    BPL Member

    @family-guy-2-2

    Roger, do you mountaineer?  If so, which peaks?

    #3396731
    George H
    BPL Member

    @unworhty

    Not familiar with X-tex, wonder if anyone on here is, but I certainly have experience with Bibler designs, before and after the BD merger. Mine have only leaked when nearing the end of their lifecycle, but condensation is an issue I never found a way to eliminate.

    To make it short, their main assets for me is the ease of setting up and super small footprint. Finding a tent platform on steep climbs is challenging. The smaller the tent the better. And really only single wall, floored, non-vestibuled mini shelters like this works.

    If vertical terrain is not on the program, but the chance of ferocious storms is, I far prefer the slightly roomier comfort of a well ventilated double wall tent. Like my Hilleberg.

     

    #3396737
    Roger Caffin
    BPL Member

    @rcaffin

    Locale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe

    “Roger, do you mountaineer?  If so, which peaks?”

    Please read “The Ascent of Rum Doodle” …

    I have been as high as about 5,755 m, via Taschi Lapcha in Nepal. It was OK, but we slept lower. That expedition was run by a commercial company, who did a rather poor job of it. Some of the porters went on strike.

    Trips over the European Alps have been far more common: Pyrenees and the main Alps in France, Switzerland, Austria etc. By and large, that took us up to 3,000 m, and we were often camping, just the two of us for all of those.

    In Australia we go XC ski touring in winter, up to 2,200 m, with camping. Purple tent: Macpac Olympus; orange tent: my V1 MYOG winter tent. In each case the weather changed overnight, but that is dead normal for Oz.

    Cheers

    #3396740
    Franco Darioli
    Spectator

    @franco

    Locale: Gauche, CU.

    Stefan,
    have you looked at the eVent tents still around ?
    The RAB Summit Extreme or the Exped Polaris if you need something a bit larger.

    If I were you I would contact Carol at Crux, he helped me in the past and I am pretty sure he knows his stuff..

    #3396747
    David L
    BPL Member

    @family-guy-2-2

    Thanks Roger – I wonder why we don’t see more three pole tunnels in NA.

    #3396753
    Tipi Walter
    BPL Member

    @tipiwalter

    David L—Here are pics of tents at 26,000 feet in the South Col of Mt Everest—and not exactly base camp tents—these tents where hand carried to this location—and most of them are double wall—

    https://www.google.com/search?q=south+col+tents&biw=1280&bih=839&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjipq6i55nMAhVI2yYKHX2rA2MQ_AUIBygC#tbm=isch&q=south+col+everest&imgrc=_

    #3396754
    Roger Caffin
    BPL Member

    @rcaffin

    Locale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe

    I wonder why we don’t see more three pole tunnels in NA.

    Several reasons, and they may seem to be a circular argument.

    Most NA walkers only travel in the 3 seasons in forested lands, maybe even less than that, and don’t need a real alpine tent.

    Most mfrs are focused solely on the biggest market they can see – which is the limited 3-season walker and the ‘Sierra Summers’.

    Most tents are made in China anyhow, and the Chinese factories do not know how to make tunnel tents (I TRIED, and failed).

    Tunnel tents are inherently more expensive than pop-ups, so they are less popular to the mass market.

    Retailers only want simple mass-market stuff as well, to avoid too many returns from newbies who ‘broke it’.

    Anyhow, while 3-pole tunnels are fairly good, it’s the 4-pole tunnels which will really take a hammering. It’s all about unsupported fabric span.

    Cheers

     

    #3396755
    Franco Darioli
    Spectator

    @franco

    Locale: Gauche, CU.

    Tipi, horses for courses ..
    (I think I’ve mentioned this before…)
    Generally speaking expeditions will use multipole geodesic tents in the 8-12lbs range.
    That is because they have porters, many .

    Guys (and girls) that do the Alpine style climbing,( one to three guys carrying everything themselves, up and down as fast as practical), generally don’t carry 10 pound tents.

    #3396766
    Woubeir (from Europe)
    BPL Member

    @woubeir

    From Crux:

    X-tex fabric has a woven textile face with a coating to make it
    both waterproof and breathable.
    X-tex fabric has a 50 denier polyester face. 50 denier is a heavy
    yarn by today’s standards, but we consider it important for a
    mountaineering tent, since the intrinsic strength of a fabric is
    derived primarily from the thickness of the yarn. Unusually, we
    have chosen polyester rather than nylon, as polyester offers
    superior resistance to UV degradation. Bivouac tents tend to
    find themselves pitched at higher altitudes where UV levels are
    also significantly greater.
    X-tex fabric is coated with polyurethane (PU), which serves as
    a substrate for the activated carbon which gives X-tex its
    unique properties. PU has a monolithic (i.e. non-porous)
    structure, which means it has an outstanding water column for
    water resistance (20,000+ mm, or 30+ psi). The coating
    ‘breathes’ by transporting the water molecules through
    hydrophilic attraction, a mechanism used by a large number of
    branded fabrics employed in waterproof/breathable garments.
    However, a PU coating on its own is insufficient to deal with the
    condensation experienced in single-wall tents, as the moisture
    build-up overloads the fabric’s ability to absorb it. To manage
    this, the PU coating is impregnated with activated carbon,
    greatly increasing the surface area available to absorb water
    molecules. These consequently stay in the disassociated state
    (i.e. they don’t form droplets) and continue to diffuse through
    the coating (i.e. the fabric continues to breathe), while the
    fabric itself remains dry to the touch.
    Fabric weight: 132 g/m² (3.9 oz/yd²)
    Hydrostatic head: 20,000 mm water column (30 psi)
    MVTR: 25,000 g/m²/24 hrs (JIS-II)
    Repellency: 80 (new) / 20 (after 20 washes) (AATCC)

     

    Then, about moutaineering, Usually, it’s not about simple walking, but about actual climbing like stuff. E.g. in the European Alps, up to 3000 or 3500 m is the domain of walkers; above it you need climbing skills so you’re in the domain of mountaineers. (This is a generalisation as there are lower peaks than 3000m for which you need climbing skills).

    #3396786
    Stefan Jacobsen
    Spectator

    @hrstefan

    Tipi Walter, I’m not interested in mass tourism like that on Everest, and I haven’t got the money either. But that is another story. Alpine style climbing sometimes involve a bivouac during summit push, and sometimes it is hard to find a level platform:

    #3396788
    Stefan Jacobsen
    Spectator

    @hrstefan

    Franco Darioli,

    Yes, I have heard about eVent and RAB tents and several other on the market. It is just that X-tex is new to me, and I wanted to know more on this specific fabric. Still, I’m open to hear about your experience with eVent tents.

    Good idea to contact Carol, even though he will be biased when comparing to other fabrics.

    #3396789
    Stefan Jacobsen
    Spectator

    @hrstefan

    Woubeir,

    Thanks for the details from the Crux website. Strange, I can’t find it myself. There are some technical specifications, but not all the text you quote. Would you be so kind as to submit a link?

    #3396793
    Woubeir (from Europe)
    BPL Member

    @woubeir

    It’s from the workbook and there’s no direct online source I’m afraid.

    #3396794
    Stefan Jacobsen
    Spectator

    @hrstefan

    Roger Caffin,

    I have nothing against tunnel (or geodesic tents), but they are not the best for the intended purpose: Summit push bivouac’s.

    #3396796
    David Chenault
    BPL Member

    @davec

    Locale: Queen City, MT

    Good grief people; if you don’t have anything relevant to say, be quiet!

    The “activated carbon” bit sounds similar/identical to cocona/37.5, which has been around for a while and is not a gimmick.  Whether it would reduce the condensation drip factor like Todd Tex does is a separate question.

    It’d be fantastic if someone made a BD Eldorado, but lighter, without giving up any function.  Anyone who doubts the capability of that tent hasn’t used it.

    #3396799
    Stefan Jacobsen
    Spectator

    @hrstefan

    George H,

    What BD/Bibler have you had? They have used two or three types of fabric, ToddTex being best at managing moisture.

    And, what Hilleberg do you prefer for flat terrain?

    #3396804
    Stefan Jacobsen
    Spectator

    @hrstefan

    David Chenault,

    You may be right that 37.5 and X-tex are similar or even the same – Crux is among the brand partners of 37.5: https://www.thirtysevenfive.com/partners/brand-partners

    #3396812
    Dan Geiger
    Spectator

    @ramcam-2

    Great thread Stefan as i have been looking at the Crux tents e-tex  vs Rab event.Being able to set up the Crux tent with the poles on the outside is very appealing.But getting some user performance reviews is sparse.

    #3396820
    John Vance
    BPL Member

    @servingko

    Locale: Intermountain West

    I have some 250+ nights in BD’s various single skin offerings from the Bibler Toddex to the Shasta epic (yellow) to the current proprietary fabric (wasabi green).

    In BIbler Toddex, I had a Fitzroy and an Eldorado (two door) that worked very well in terms of moisture management.  Both tents were incredibly strong and easy to set up in mixed conditions.  Frost would form on the inside but the fuzzy facing kept it on the wall surprisingly well even when the sun would thaw things and melt the frost allowing it to evaporate.  My biggest complaint wasn’t even the weight but the bulk.  The Eldorado was mostly carried on my back but the Fitzroy was typically in a sled where it didn’t matter as much.   These were both used at altitude in extreme winter conditions with great success.  I especially appreciated the ability to stake it out and then climb inside out of the weather to erect the tent.  The Fitzroy was bomber and I slept through many nights while the wind and snow raged all night.

    The BD tents were a Skylight and a pair of First Lights.  The Skylight was the yellow version and the Firstlight was one early version and a later green version.  I still have the Wasabi Firstlight and use it primarily in dry winter conditions.  The Skylight was used mostly in shoulder seasons in exposed terrain above tree line and performed well.  Most nights were in the worse conditions for a single wall with snow and freezing rain alternating.  Condensation was at times manageable but somewhat problematic, with dripping off the poles in particular.  For the weight and compact size, I was always impressed with the wind shedding capabilities and even in extended rain (24-36 hours of non stop), I never had problems that were a concern in terms of the tent’s ability to protect me from the elements.  I use the Firstlight solo and the Skylight double.  I have found for me that if the tent is large enough to avoid the walls when condensation is present, it isn’t an issue.  Two people in a Firstlight wouldn’t work for me.

    Neither of the BD tents have been above 13,500 feet but they have experienced high winds – 40-50 mph sustained with gusts to 60 or more.   No damage but I have had to sit leaning against the wall to keep the tent from collapsing for hours.  The Skylight handled wind better than the Firstlight but would be a poor choice for high altitude with all the mesh obviously, but the fabric performed well.  I know others had issues they could or didn’t expect to have to deal with, but overall well executed single wall designs.

    #3396827
    Matt Dirksen
    BPL Member

    @namelessway

    Locale: Mid Atlantic

    Activated carbon? Cool. I’d love to hear more about that, too. Regarding Event, it seems to me to be a good wpb fabric, but I don’t see it as a complete vapor/moisture management system since it doesn’t manage condensed vapor. (Like Todd/Tegral Tex)

    While I don’t pull out my Eldorado as often as I did 20 yrs ago, it still amazes me how well it deals with condensing vapor. It’s important to remember that at certain temperatures, vapor will condense no matter what, and how a fabric deals with it at that particular point is crucial. Of course one can’t beat a well designed double walled system, but it’s obviously not always practical.

    But it sure sounds like the activated carbon might do the same thing as Toddtex, but personally I’d want to know a lot more about it’s °/RH/hPa “comfort zone”, overall performance, and long term durability before I’d drop a $$ into it. I’m replacing carbon water filter cartridges in my refrigerator all the time, so how long will the PU substrate keep the carbon suspended, or will it fall apart or “clog up” at some point?

    At least ToddTex still does it’s thing.

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 30 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Loading...