Topic
Seeking thoughts on Katadyn’s BeFree
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Seeking thoughts on Katadyn’s BeFree
- This topic has 93 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 2 months ago by Brad W.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Sep 11, 2024 at 11:51 am #3817960
Hi Jerry. Using actual pathogen particles is the only acceptable approach. In principle filtration is purely a size selection but that’s not necessarily true in practice where there can be binding of species to internal membrane walls, competitive binding with other species and other complications. Manufacturers and the FDA don’t want to think about this but it’s true. So proxy particle retention is not acceptable since the surface chemistry and binding can be different.
Also, not all pathogen particles are infectious which is particularly true for viruses. So simply counting the fraction that are retained is not relevant, the test needs to be specific to the infectious particle fraction. This also accounts for the potential for pass through of damaged or inactivated pathogen. For example, if non infectious pathogen fragments pass through the filter, that is not hazardous.
Sep 11, 2024 at 12:19 pm #3817962That makes sense, thanks
Sep 11, 2024 at 4:16 pm #3817974All of this filter talk and no mention the hydrapak 42 mm filter cap? I also grabbed one of them to play with. I will be honest.. the 1 nit pick I already have with the Versa Flow I just got the other day, it’s pretty big, comparable to a standard Sawyer filter and I kind of liked that the BeFree sits inside the bladder more, so when it’s empty it is more compact. Small nitpick yes.. so I also ordered the hydrapak filter because that is like the BeFree.. sitting inside the water bag more and less sticking out. I will say, my original filter set up I have been using, the BeFree and the modified Sawyer Micro is nice because the Micro is smaller and I can use that on my hydrapak water bladder or on my smartwater bottle if needed. So that will stay with me.. but if I can find one of these 2 new filters to replace the BeFree.. I will make the change. I am hoping the hydrapak wins for me because like I said.. I prefer the way it can stay in the bladder and not be as bulky as the VersaFlow.
Sep 11, 2024 at 4:18 pm #3817975Sep 11, 2024 at 5:36 pm #3817977Sep 11, 2024 at 6:14 pm #3817980For practical use, I much prefer an outwardly facing filter. Allows for connection on both ends and overall filtration of a larger % of the water collected without janking up the connection point of the bladder. Just my opinion fwiw.
Sep 12, 2024 at 5:45 am #3817992In the video Brad W posted, it was mentioned that the Sawyer could withstand quite a bit of pressure and that was the key to back flushing efficiency. That makes a lot of sense and logically squares with reports of BeFree clogs not being rectified by “swishing”…a certain amount of backward pressure is necessary to force clogging material from the pores of the filter element.
Sep 12, 2024 at 8:26 am #3817995a certain amount of backward pressure is necessary to force clogging material from the pores of the filter element.
Moreover, according to Sawyer, if you backflush with lower pressure, you only clear the easier to remove material, not all the blockage, and subsequent backflushing will take the path of least resistance leaving you with a filter that never restore to full flow.
Sep 12, 2024 at 8:38 am #3817996I’m skeptical about the claims that Sawyer gets hollow fiber membranes that are somehow exclusively better. Why would the other companies buy an inferior product, unless Sawyer somehow has an exclusive contract for it. Wouldn’t the same level of quality and testing be available to any filter company? Maybe they buy more so get a better price, but the claim rings a little off when others are probably buying from the same factory. It just sounds a little like marketing hype.
Sep 12, 2024 at 10:17 am #3817999if you apply more pressure, the hollow tubes will expand more, including the pores, which would release more particles trapped in the pores
I don’t see why you couldn’t backflush the befree. Doesn’t the output have threads you could screw onto, or couldn’t you take the Sawyer syringe and push it onto the befree output?
Sep 12, 2024 at 12:55 pm #3818001Sep 12, 2024 at 12:55 pm #3818002Sep 12, 2024 at 1:18 pm #3818005Just returned from a 10 day trip in the Winds filtering about 4 liters a day and have been using BeFree filters since they came out with great success.
This particular filter had already filtered some 70 liters and had been back flushed, soaked in vinegar, and sterilized with a bleach solution prior to taking on this trip. Before leaving, I soaked the filter overnight and tested it with good flow. By day two it began to slow down and by day six it was just a trickle. We finished the trip with it but it took nearly 15 minutes to get a half liter and it was my first “failure” in the field with a BeFree.
I am going to see if I can get it flowing again but may go back to my Steripen Adventure for another trip next week. I really like the BeFree and will likely continue to use them as they have worked well after the first one I purchased when they first came out. The high flow rate is addictive.
Sep 12, 2024 at 1:24 pm #3818006Yes I agree. I purchased about 5 of them over the years.. not really on the bandwagon to buy another one. Seems kind of wasteful at this point. Hopefully one of these 2 will work out better.. otherwise, back to steripen and tabs for when that fails..
Sep 12, 2024 at 1:31 pm #3818007Great conversation, learning much. I’ve already stated how much I love my Versaflow.
@dirtbag interesting you say you like the “internal” aspects of the Befree. While it’s certainly shorter than the VF or Sawyer units, it would seem it doesn’t make that big of a difference? Seeing as the filter is inside of a bag it still needs the space. It also always made me nervous that the filter would abrade the bag and potentially cause leaks. I suspect that was part of a pinhole leak my buddy had on the Grand in June with me. By the end my Versaflow was feeding water to three out of five thirsty hikers.Sep 12, 2024 at 1:41 pm #3818008Slightest aside, please forgive the thread drift, but I’ve always thought it would be swell to have a “back flushable” sediment filter. Does anynody know the MAXIMUM pore size of a hollow membrane filter or any other filter tech that might exist? Would be great for muddy or silty water.
Sep 12, 2024 at 2:39 pm #3818010“Steripen and tabs for when that fails…”.
Yep. I’m one of the lucky ones who’ve never had a steripen failure. I carry the battery model and not the rechargeable. It seems a lot of the failures I’ve read about here involve the rechargeable models. I could be wrong.
Sep 12, 2024 at 2:52 pm #3818011The Sawyer filter elements are probably made to a higher spec than the other brands as the 0.1 micron absolute would require. Are there filtering strands not passing the 0.1 micron test being used by other filter manufacturers? Sounds likely. Also the wall thickness of the tubes, as well as the resin(epoxy?) holding said tubes in place allows for tremendous pressure during back-flushing. The tubes may be weaker with the Befree hence no backflushing allowed.
Sep 12, 2024 at 3:43 pm #3818012I used the Steripen Adventurer Opti with CR123 batteries
It failed several times, but I think it was I left the batteries in the unit and they slowly drained, and I used cheap CR123 batteries and rechargeable CR123 batteries. I just returned it.
I think it would have been fine if I used name brand batteries. Take them out between trips. Always take a spare set of batteries.
I’d rather use the one with an internal rechargeable battery and charge it before each trip. If that worked.
Sep 12, 2024 at 3:51 pm #3818013VVersa Flow, Sawyer Mico, Hydrapak ..
Sep 12, 2024 at 3:54 pm #3818014Sep 12, 2024 at 3:59 pm #3818015- Keep in mind the Sawyer and Versa Flow both have the Befree attachment thingy on them so I can use on the bladder.. or Un my smartwater bottle if needed… just unscrew it.
Sep 12, 2024 at 4:11 pm #3818016I’m curious – who in this conversation filters 100% of the water they consume in the backcountry?
Sep 12, 2024 at 4:30 pm #3818017Not I.
If it’s like a spring flowing out of the mountain.. at higher elevation.. I will drink it commando style. 49 years..
On one trip a while back my filter bonked with such minimal flow.. I drank water straight up for a few days.. I was ok. However, I wouldn’t recommend that to anyone, not even myself!
Sep 12, 2024 at 5:28 pm #3818019Drop of soap in your back flush followed with a good rinse.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.