Topic
RMNP food storage regulations – Ursack vs Canister
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Campfire › Trip Planning › RMNP food storage regulations – Ursack vs Canister
- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 7 months ago by
Jenny A.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jun 2, 2017 at 7:29 am #3471008
RMNP website states the following:
“Between April 1 and October 31, all food items and garbage must be secured inside a commercially-made carry in/carry out bear-resistant food storage container.”
Leaves it pretty open to interpretation… would an ursack be sufficient or do I need a hard-sided canister? I guess I could just call them but get the feeling I could get varying answers depending on who I talk to… or maybe I am just looking for someone to tell me that an ursack is ok so I can save some weight :)
Jun 2, 2017 at 7:58 am #3471014No Ursacks allowed…hard sided canisters only. RMNP is pretty proud of their 20-30 black bears, which may or may not even be inside the Park on a given day. 6-8 years ago when a couple of them figured out how to score easy goodies along a string of several campsites along the Thunder Lake trail, they instituted the canister rule. They didn’t want Californication to happen in RMNP. Â Bummer, I know. We locals feel your pain.
Jun 2, 2017 at 8:07 am #3471015Bummer… Do people normally carry bear spray too?
Jun 2, 2017 at 8:10 am #3471016No need for bear spray. Nobody I knows has ever seen a bear in RMNP.
Jun 2, 2017 at 8:11 am #3471017Thanks Gary!
Jul 10, 2019 at 10:53 pm #3601466Well well. After picking up a backcountry permit for a trip into the Park later this month, I was idly perusing the summer newsletter handout and happened to read the following under the Wilderness Camping blurb: all food items and garbage must be stored in an approved, commercially made bear-resistant container “that is either hard-sided or has a non-crushable insert”!!! I called the backcountry office, and this does indeed mean the Ursack with the aluminum insert. Glory be! Of course, this being the Government, they have to actually see your Ursack to verify that you have put the insert in. Dear lord.
This is good progress in the lighter-weight world, though I got the impression that this recent change is deliberately not being widely advertised. There seems to be nothing in the Park’s wilderness food storage requirements reflecting this change on the website. I would bet that most visitors don’t pay much attention to the Wilderness Camping paragraphs in this free newsletter, either. Hopefully, this change will stay in place.
If I choose to carry the Ursack, it will mean another separate 80-mile round trip for the verification, but it might be worth the weight savings. Guess I should feel lucky to live so close!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
HAPPENING RIGHT NOW (February 11-21, 2025) - Shop Hyperlite Mountain Gear's Biggest Sale of the Year:
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.