Topic

Light Backpacking Book from 1981


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums General Forums General Lightweight Backpacking Discussion Light Backpacking Book from 1981

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3513960
    Dale Wambaugh
    BPL Member

    @dwambaugh

    Locale: Pacific Northwest

    I found this old paperback from 1981: ” Light Backpacking” by Donald J. Christian. It is interesting that the publisher’s note at the top reads “A WINCHESTER PRESS PACK-ALONG GUIDE” (at 8.6oz).

     

    Still the old 1/4 body weight load limit. What was in the “Heavy Backpacking” book!

    #3513967
    Katherine .
    BPL Member

    @katherine

    Locale: pdx

    Wasn’t the 80s the heaviest time ever, with the advent of “bomber” gear? Before that everyone just took a tarp, a wool blankets and a tin cup, right?

    Boot, bags and canteens….already lost me.

    #3513982
    Dale Wambaugh
    BPL Member

    @dwambaugh

    Locale: Pacific Northwest

    My first Scout overnight hike was in 1965 with a Trapper Nelson (designed by the Spanish Inquisition), a rectangular flannel lined sleeping bag, a Korean War era air mattress (that leaked), an Army Surplus mess kit and canteen and we slept in a waxed canvas pyramid tent. We “cooked” on a campfire and managed to keep from giving ourselves food poisoning. Of course I was wearing mostly cotton and Converse “hiking boots.” The trek was short but steep with 3000′ of miserable switchbacks. I thought I was gonna die.

    I’ll never forget that the Eagle Scout had all the latest lightweight gear and brought in a steak on ice.

    #3513993
    David Thomas
    BPL Member

    @davidinkenai

    Locale: North Woods. Far North.

    They’ve got the “put the heaviest items in the lower sections because you want your center of gravity to be as low as possible” fallacy.

    First off, leave the heaviest items at home!

    Then put the densest, necessary items nearest your back and high up, so you don’t have lean so far forward.  You’re not more stable with a low CoG.  You can stay stable more easily with a high CoG.  Put a weight on one end of a pencil and try to balance it, upright, on your finger.  You can do with the weight high, but not with the weight low.

    #3514031
    MJ H
    BPL Member

    @mjh

    I’ll never forget that the Eagle Scout had all the latest lightweight gear and brought in a steak on ice.

    I don’t know if my son will ever go back and make First Class, let alone Eagle, but I do know that now they don’t wait until Eagle to tell you to keep meat cold before you cook it.

    #3515916
    Edward John M
    BPL Member

    @moondog55

    In the 80s this was UL stuff.

    I know I was there and unlike the 60s I remember it

    30% of my body weight was at that time a lot less than I had been carrying, I weighed 80kg and I often had 45 kilo loads in winter, not at all unusual at the time and this was about the time nylon shells for sleeping bags started to become more affordable and tent weights started to drop. Of course I am talking winter; in summer you don’t need tents or sleeping bags here, just something to keep the insects off and a tarp

    Heavy and low works for skiing, scrambling and climbing tho and a lot of good books from that time reflect the bias towards hard walking and scrambling as part of the normal pattern. Totally different to walking along a graded path

    BTW a pencil weighted at the base is a lot more stable I just tried it

    #3515956
    Paul Wagner
    BPL Member

    @balzaccom

    Locale: Wine Country

    My first trips were in the late 60’s. A Dacron fill bag that strapped on the outside of the pack. An open cell foam pad that was torso length. And an orange tube tent. Throw that into a cheapo external frame pack with a nylon bag, and we were ready to roll. And yes, my hiking boots were Converse All-Stars…

    #3515976
    Rex Sanders
    BPL Member

    @rex

    Turns out there was an actual lightweight backpacking revolution in the early 1980s – that more or less sank without a trace:

    https://rockssandwater.blogspot.com/2010/11/lightweight-backpacking-in-early-1980s.html

    And I did the Boy Scout thing in the 1960s, including an aluminum-framed backpack with a canvas sack, unpadded shoulder straps, and no hip belt. Add the dacron sleeping bag (with built-in groundsheet!), leaky canvas pup tent, and an aluminum mess kit to cook canned Spam over an open fire. Hiking in a t-shirt, jeans, and Converse All-Stars with cotton socks.

    I almost gave up backpacking.

    — Rex

    #3516047
    Eric Blumensaadt
    BPL Member

    @danepacker

    Locale: Mojave Desert

    Ya know, as someone who actually remembers the ’70s and ’80s (I didn’t do much beyond Mary Jane –  “believe me” – you could buy relatively light GERRY backpacks, small SVEA stoves, down bags and jackets, closed cell foam mattresses, aluminum pots and decent tarps (urethane coated but lighter than a tent).

    So if you chose carefully you could have a 20 lb. base weight. “Notta too bad, notta too bad.” as FR. Guido Sarducci used to say on SNL.

    AND, if you were a smarty pants you could buy a Frostline pack kit and substitute lighter fabrics in most places.

    The tough part was finding light hiking boots (as hiking shoes were not yet “invented”). Vasque “Waffle Stompers” were pretty much it.

    And forget aluminum hiking poles. that was a DIY project.

    #3516088
    Edward John M
    BPL Member

    @moondog55

    Australia took a while to catch up mainly due to the ruggedness of our major walking areas. SW Tasmania is incredibly hard on gear as is a lot of New Zealand

    When LW gear got here we adopted very quickly even if it did wear out quickly. We went LW and UL simply by making do with less but you cannot do that in winter so we winter snow campers still had to carry those heavy loads

    Most of what I remember is being cold and wet a lot of the time, that doesn’t happen these days, I haven’t been wet & cold at the same time for decades.

    This doesn’t mean we deliberately carried heavy packs, we trimmed and cut and always got our loads as light as possible, the mantra has always been “Count every ounce because every ounce counts” the weights were simply a consequence of the affordable materials available to us at the time. Times have changed and now the LW finely woven 3 ounce cottons are the expensive fabrics and 1 ounce ripstop is the cheap stuff

    UL gear does have drawbacks where longevity us concerned tho and this can become a serious financial burden, my japara windshirt lasted 3 decades until it became unusable and I go trough a Montane UL windshirt every season because the fabric cannot be sewn strongly enough to withstand the treatment it gets CC skiing DIY seems to be the option there

    #3519138
    Tony Ronco
    BPL Member

    @tr-browsing

    RE: 80’s

    If you followed Doug Robinson’s writings about his adventures (in the late ‘70’s) you would have a baseweight of 12 lbs.  Then in July 1982 this issue of Backpacker came out. Fred Williams and Chuck Kennedy had baseweights of 5-1/2 lbs with a carry weight of 15 lbs for a 5 day trek of 92 miles.  This issue really had a profound effect on my approach to backpacking.

    https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B3QSQU2xVN0XekpkZEZVTTBSRjQ/edit?pli=1

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Loading...