Topic

Geeking Out: Physics Applied to Bodyweight & Packweight


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums General Forums Philosophy & Technique Geeking Out: Physics Applied to Bodyweight & Packweight

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3383777
    Valerie E
    Spectator

    @wildtowner

    Locale: Grand Canyon State

    Fun article about using physics to calculate pack weight, body weight, and a comfortable carry.

    Cliff Notes version:  The smaller you are in size, the (relatively) more packweight you can comfortably handle.

    #3383782
    David Thomas
    BPL Member

    @davidinkenai

    Locale: North Woods. Far North.

    Hence, ants can carry many times their body weight.  Elephants can not.

    #3383809
    Alexander S
    BPL Member

    @cascadicus

    I read about something similar as part of a Vietnam era army study when it was observed that skinnier guys seemed to fatigue less than more muscular ones. Increased muscle mass = higher energy consumption. Women apparently fatigue less in the long haul as well.

    #3383823
    Kevin Babione
    BPL Member

    @kbabione

    Locale: Pennsylvania

    FINALLY!  Scientific proof that I’m miserable going uphill with a pack of any weight.  I’m a big guy (270 pounds) and I often have one of the lightest packs in our group and I’m usually the one dragging behind as we hike.

    Oh wait…It says “for reasonably fit adults.”  I knew there had to be a catch!

    #3383827
    Kenneth Keating
    Spectator

    @kkkeating

    Locale: Sacramento, Calif

    I think my wife just lost out on her excuse on why her backpack should weight quite a bit less.  But then again, it may not be in my best interest to bring this up.  Such a dilemma.

    #3383832
    Roger Caffin
    BPL Member

    @rcaffin

    Locale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe

    Yeah, that’s fine, BUT!

    Do NOT use misinterpret this. It applies to reasonably fit ADULTS. Small children should be limited to carrying less than 25% of their body weight because their spines are not fully formed and can be damaged. The vertebrate segments and the cartiledge between them are still soft in children.

    Cheers

     

    #3386382
    Paul McLaughlin
    BPL Member

    @paul-1

    Also – I’d be very cautious about suggesting to anyone what a comfortable packweight would be for them. There’s so much personal variation. The fit and experienced older hiker vs. the young couch potato is one easy contrast. Or the strong walker with not so strong back (like my wife) who can do plenty of miles with a light load but can get into trouble quick with a heavier pack. comparing the average person to the average person makes for interesting reading but not very useful in any particular case.

    #3386429
    Bob Moulder
    BPL Member

    @bobmny10562

    Locale: Westchester County, NY

    comparing the average person to the average person makes for interesting reading but not very useful in any particular case.

    +1(!)

    Speaking strictly for myself — although most older backpackers would probably concur, with some highly notable exceptions, lol — lighter has proven to be much better, and even more so as the athletic endeavors of youth catch up with me. My knees and hips ain’t what they used to be, and it’s not much of a stretch to say that UL and SUL packing have enabled me to extend my playtime quite a bit. Gotta say, it’s fun to be able to keep up with the kids on the trail. :^)

     

    #3390177
    Eric Blumensaadt
    BPL Member

    @danepacker

    Locale: Mojave Desert

    “The willing horse carries the heaviest load.”

    “All packs are equal but some packs are more equal than others.” (Quote from “Thru Hiker Farm”)

    #3390882
    Diane “Piper” Soini
    BPL Member

    @sbhikes

    Locale: Santa Barbara

    What if you are on the slightly heavy side due to weight lifting rather than overeating?

    #3390893
    Roger Caffin
    BPL Member

    @rcaffin

    Locale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe

    What if you are on the slightly heavy side due to weight lifting rather than overeating?

    Who’s admitting anything?
    You do NOT ask a lady her weight.

    Cheers

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Loading...