Received pretty thoughtful and detailed response today, which I posted below.
TL:DR: GAIA is aware of the issue with it’s algorithm (which in my case caused a nearly 100% over estimation) with no current ETA on resolution.
I will be using CALTOPO as the route calculation looks much more accurate. Who in the world is going to plan backcountry routes when they have no accurate idea what the true elevation gain/loss is with GAIA?
Hi there,
We’ve seen some reports of routes displaying unexpected elevation stats.
Specifically in areas with big canyons, the issue is frequently with the elevation data. The problem is that the elevation data has a 30-meter resolution. Meaning the elevation for any given point along your route could be 15m to the left or right of the point you’re plotting. If you have a trail going along a narrow canyon, the elevation recorded for some of the points could be part-way up the canyon wall, some on the bottom, and a lot of elevation gain will build up quickly because of that.
We’re looking into this more and we plan to update our algorithm so that it better accounts for these elevation swings in situations like this one.
Unfortunately, I don’t have an ETA on when you can expect this update to happen, but we are working on it.
Gaia GPS
Adventure Support | Gaia GPS Customer Success
Outside Inc. Team