Topic

A good alternative to WPB gear for ACTIVE backpacking


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) A good alternative to WPB gear for ACTIVE backpacking

Viewing 25 posts - 251 through 275 (of 368 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3461230
    Stumphges
    BPL Member

    @stumphges

    Roger,

    How about fluorocarbon and wax-based? E.g. factory fluorocarbon finish with Nikwax applied by unwitting consumer a year or two down the road.

    #3461231
    Woubeir (from Europe)
    BPL Member

    @woubeir

    My idea would be that since these two have a different chemistry, they at least don’t cooperate well and likely don’t work well together.

    #3461239
    Stumphges
    BPL Member

    @stumphges

    Yeah, I find it curious that so much Nikwax is sold to the aftermarket, but that only Paramo gear is sold with Nikwax as the factory finish. It would seem that ~95% of the Nikwax sold is applied to garments that originally carried a fluorocarbon finish. Some of these finishes will be well and truly stripped by years of abrasion and washing cycles, and so the fabric might be ready to be ‘converted’ to Nikwax. But I would guess a substantial number of garments are “re-proofed” with Nikwax well before the fluorocarbon DWR is gone from the fabric. Many consumers don’t know about pure soap and double rinsing, drying at 120 degrees, etc., and these folks, assuming that “doesn’t bead up anymore” = DWR is gone, probably dump Nikwax onto still-adhered fluorocarbon finishes. How does that work for them?

    #3461248
    Richard Nisley
    BPL Member

    @richard295

    Locale: San Francisco Bay Area

    Stumphges,

    50 or 0 as a starting point is fine. What is relevant is the delta post DWR.

     

    Woubeir,

    I purchased the Nikwax at my local REI store last year.

    I purchased the Grangers from MEC on 5/7/16 via mail order. I thought they may have been still selling the old C8 stuff but it was a different bottle. It was listed as their product # 5007404 but the picture showed the old C8 bottle.

    I purchased the can of Revivex yesterday at my local REI retail shop in San Carlos, CA. They currently offer only this Revivex container option and only had a couple of cans on a portion of a shelving area allocated to McNett repair parts.  The Primary REI DWR display was huge and was exclusively stocked with Nikwax DWR.

    The surface tension of water in contact with air, at my test environment of 70F, is equivalent to about 3.49mm vs the 300mm value the green value DWR shows.

    #3461249
    Woubeir (from Europe)
    BPL Member

    @woubeir

    Richard,

    as it  seems Granger’s has no Xtreme-productrange anymore, I assume your bottle contains FC’s.

    #3461250
    Woubeir (from Europe)
    BPL Member

    @woubeir

    Roger,

    just out of curiousity, what elements in my reasoning are not exactly true ?

    #3461255
    Richard Nisley
    BPL Member

    @richard295

    Locale: San Francisco Bay Area

    Two of the samples air dried for 12 hours and Granger’s was machine dried per instructions. All three DWRs imparted excellent reduction in surface tension to achieve a 5 spray rating (best) versus 0 prior to the DWR applications. Next samples were hydrostatic head tested and none of them exhibited any significant increase in HH (showed about 50 mm which is my machine tolerance). The test results are below as well as updated in my yesterday post.

    Each sample was tested with the DWR surface facing the water pressure.

     

    #3461258
    Richard Nisley
    BPL Member

    @richard295

    Locale: San Francisco Bay Area

    Woubier,

    You said, “as it seems Granger’s has no Xtreme-product range anymore, I assume your bottle contains FC’s.” Also the fact that the Xtreme instructions say to use a dryer after applying the product significantly reinforces the probability that this is C6.

    Since most consumers don’t know what DWR was applied to their DWR garment when manufactured and the DWR vendors don’t label the contents of their aftermarket DWR products… lots of WPB jackets are probably being discarded under the assumption that since they wet out they are worn out.

    #3461263
    Ken Larson
    BPL Member

    @kenlarson

    Locale: Western Michigan

    https://grangers.co.uk/products/clothing-repel

    Grangers Clothing Repel is a fluorocarbon-free waterproofing treatment, based on Grangers’ unique Acrylic Polymer Technology. APT provides a highly breathable finish while maintaining excellent water-repellency and durability.

    This product is an updated/rebranded version of Grangers Performance Proofer. Usage instructions are as follows:

    • Use two 50ml capfuls per garment. For best results, we recommend reproofing garments separately.
    • For each additional garment washed, add an extra 50ml capful of Clothing Repel to the washing machine.
    • Wash on a full cycle (wash, rinse, and spin) at 30°C or 86°F.
    • Treated garments can be left to dry naturally. Performance/longevity may be improved through tumble drying.
    #3461267
    Richard Nisley
    BPL Member

    @richard295

    Locale: San Francisco Bay Area

    Grangers offered both C6 and non-C6 when I ordered the product used to test

    This is how MEC listed the product I ordered and used for this test. Notice that the bottle is an image of the C8 bottle but they shipped the C6 bottle shown previously.

    #3461274
    Richard Nisley
    BPL Member

    @richard295

    Locale: San Francisco Bay Area

    I purchased 2 linear yds of test material. Until it is used up, I will ship free untreated 1’sq fabric samples to anyone who has access to a HH tester and wants to do their own DWR tests. All that is required is sending me a postage prepaid (SF, CA area) envelope to that is large enough to contain the number of samples you are requesting (4 max).

    #3461283
    Stumphges
    BPL Member

    @stumphges

    Richard,

    Thank you very much for taking the time and trouble to run these tests.

    Now, I suppose, we have to reconcile your results with Dr. Gibson’s. I have some ideas but doubt they would hold any water.

    Anyone know if there is a way to share pdf files on this forum without file sharing sites?

    #3461285
    Woubeir (from Europe)
    BPL Member

    @woubeir

    Richard,

    interesting. Now, I could be wrong but I think that in the Natick-study the two sides of a fabric were treated with a repellant, Not that I think this will create a huge difference but you never know.

    #3461304
    Roger Caffin
    BPL Member

    @rcaffin

    Locale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe

    Why did Betamax lose out to VHS? Or why did the superior French Campingaz connector lose out to the technically-inferior UK Epigas screw-thread?

    I suspect that Paramo and Nikwax have a nice UK market which keeps them happy, and there has not been the pressure to take over the world. So they did not try. I also suspect that the marketing spin and budget of the American membrane companies (especially Gore), coupled with the willingness of the consumer to want ‘100% waterproof’ rather than more realistic ‘water-repellent’ rainwear, may have something to do with it.

    It turns out that fluorocarbons are being deprecated fast for environmental reasons, which may see Nikwax (and the new Graingers) rise in prominence. At the same time, 100% waterproof ponchos made of silnylon can offer what many want – but not as jackets with their condensation problems.

    Can you apply Nikwax over fluorocarbon? I believe so. A wax/EPDM mix should stick to it. I would not try applying fluorocarbon over Nikwax though: it would not be able to bond to the fabric fibres anymore and would wear off very fast.

    Woubier – I forget the details. I am sorry – remind me please?
    EDIT: Oh, I see. Cultural problem only (we get these). ‘Close enough’ means that I cannot see any problems in what you were saying. I was agreeing.

    Cheers

    #3461310
    Woubeir (from Europe)
    BPL Member

    @woubeir

    Roger,

    OK. You never know how you could be wrong in just a tiny error. For someone else it might not matter but I always want to improve what I already know or think I know, even if it’s just in details.

    #3461434
    Stumphges
    BPL Member

    @stumphges

    Hi Roger,

    Thanks for your thoughts on Nikwax and flour/wax compatibility. Do you think that a wax impregnated inner fleece worn under a fluorocarbon DWR-treated windshirt would mess up the later? From your post I’m guessing it should be OK.

    Eventually, I’d like to switch from fluoro to wax/Epic (depending on conditions/terrain) entirely, for the health and environmental reasons you’ve mentioned, at least until something better comes along (which must be around the corner, surely, with all the research being done on super-hydrophobic surfaces.) But I’ve got several flurocarbon-DWR windshirts and a standalone Paramo “pump liner” that I’d like to pair in the meanwhile.

    BTW, do you bother putting DWR on your Taslan wind shirts?

    #3461483
    Roger Caffin
    BPL Member

    @rcaffin

    Locale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe

    Do you think that a wax impregnated inner fleece worn under a fluorocarbon DWR-treated windshirt would mess up the later?
    Should have no visible effect whatsoever. Windshirts and pump liners should go fine together.

    which must be around the corner, surely, with all the research being done on super-hydrophobic surfaces.
    Plenty of them around, and they work excellently in the lab. So far they have all be a total failure in the field, especially on fabrics. For some reason a shirt on your back on the side of a mountain does not behave the same as a smooth test surface in the lab …

    do you bother putting DWR on your Taslan wind shirts?
    Nope. Would not work. We get sweaty in the Australian summer, and all DWRs are killed by sweat and body oils. Quite pointless.

    Cheers

    #3461493
    Stumphges
    BPL Member

    @stumphges

    Thank you very much, Roger. Cheers

     

    #3463628
    Paul S.
    BPL Member

    @pschontz

    Locale: PNW

    Anyone have the specs on the Tyono fabric used in the Arc’teryx Nodin jacket?

    EDIT: never mind. I just realized it is the renamed Gossamera and not a new fabric.

    Anyways, would be great to build a list of 300+ mm HH jackets in the 25+ CFM range.

    #3464099
    Stumphges
    BPL Member

    @stumphges

    Paul,

    Very few on that list. Unicorns:

    BD Alpine Start

    Wild Things Multicam Windshirt 1.0

    Luke’s Ultralight Argon 90 windshirt

     

    Regarding Nodin, it may or may not be a previously used fabric. The Toray fabrics Arcteryx uses for their windshirts can and have had very thin polyurethane coatings on their inner surfaces, which dramatically change their hydrostatic head. The face fabrics might be identical but the coating specs might vary by year and jacket model. Nodin looks nice and full featured, but for the hood – it lacks a proper brim.

     

     

     

     

    #3464140
    Mike M
    BPL Member

    @mtwarden

    Locale: Montana

    I think you can add the Patagonia Level 4 to the above short list as well

    #3464150
    Woubeir (from Europe)
    BPL Member

    @woubeir

    The Tyono used in the Nodin is the 20D-version so the old name is Luminara.

    #3464152
    Simon Kenton
    BPL Member

    @simonbutler

    Mike – Patagonia Gen 2 (PCU) Level 4 or Gen 3? Or does it even matter?

    #3464154
    Stumphges
    BPL Member

    @stumphges

    Mike, I think R. Nisley tested the HH of the Patagonia Level 4 at < 100mm. https://backpackinglight.com/forums/topic/108524/page/2/#post-2238895

    Have you found its performance to be better than that figure would suggest?

    #3464164
    Mike M
    BPL Member

    @mtwarden

    Locale: Montana

    not sure what gen mine is, circa 2009-ish

    I have an Alpine Start and in real world use, I would say the Patagonia level 4 performs equally to it in both breathabilty and water resistance. It’s possible Richards sample was under performing or a different gen????

    I use the level 4 big game hunting and the Start backpacking

Viewing 25 posts - 251 through 275 (of 368 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Loading...