Topic
The Range of Light: Fastpacking the John Muir Trail in Under a Week
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Campfire › Editor’s Roundtable › The Range of Light: Fastpacking the John Muir Trail in Under a Week
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Nov 21, 2014 at 6:54 pm #2151111AnonymousInactive
"Thanks to my Scandinavian ancestry, I'm more of an ideal size for pillaging monasteries."
You better get after it, then. ISIS has built up a formidable lead.
Nov 21, 2014 at 7:02 pm #2151112AnonymousInactive"Somewhere on here or his site, Roman Dial wrote about the ideal size for hiking. I don't remember the exact numbers but it was something like 5'10", 160 lbs and a size 9 or 10 foot.
I think it might be in his How Far? How Fast? article."
I reread the article, Jack, and couldn't find that comment anywhere. I recall him saying something to that effect somewhere, but my hazy recollection is that the physique was smaller/lighter, with feet in that range. Makes sense, because he was talking about not breaking thru snow and ice crust, or sinking into tundra, IIRC.
If you should happen to run across the source, would you mind posting it?
Nov 21, 2014 at 9:47 pm #2151133"If you should happen to run across the source, would you mind posting it?"
Will do, Tom. I searched through his posts here and didn't see it. I'm guessing its on his site, I'll be trying to find it this weekend.
Nov 21, 2014 at 11:28 pm #2151138I've searched through his Arctic 1000 and AMWC posts and did some keyword google searches with no luck.
This thread is the closest I've found him to mentioning something, but no specifics: http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/forums/thread_display.html?forum_thread_id=4623
I haven't taken the time yet to reread through the other responses.
Also, there was the recent thread ("It pays to be small") on here that discussed the study of backpack weight with a smaller human frame but it doesn't provide specific details.
Anyways, looks like his statement may be lost in the interwebs for now…
Dec 1, 2014 at 3:21 pm #2153273I can identify with the emotional ups and down of solo walking in general, so Josh's candid reporting of his internal battles really resonated with me. As to the fastpack-slowpack conversation that has broken out, I really don't care. I've covered 150 miles in five days. I've also been known to haul a guitar and three bottles of mezcal to 13,000 feet and fish my way through 20 miles in 9 days. To each his own, whenever and however they so chose.
Jan 7, 2015 at 3:05 pm #2162436NICE PIC! I miss Bondcliff. Haven't been on that loop in a few years and its one of my favorite places in the world to spend a few days of hiking… just for fun here's the other perspective:
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.