Topic
UL fishing footwear?
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Off Piste › Fishing & Tenkara › UL fishing footwear?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jul 18, 2013 at 9:14 am #1305536
Do you guys have any suggestions for UL fishing footwear while backpacking, and just for day trips? I usually bring along a pair of homemade blue foam flip-flops. Should I invest in neoprene socks?
I'm thinking of something fairly inexpensive, and LIGHT.
Jul 18, 2013 at 9:23 am #2007348I fish in the same shoes I hike in, my Inov8 Roclite 295's.
Jul 18, 2013 at 9:28 am #2007350I just got back from a trip to the South Fork of the Flathead, and I felt that the NRS neoprene socks plus my trail runners worked very well.
My only complaint is the silt and small rocks that got in my shoes, but the velcro on my Dirty Girl gaiters came loose, so I think if I fix that, they'll keep the silt and stuff out. Otherwise, I wouldn't change a thing.
Jul 18, 2013 at 9:40 am #2007354I think it matters what your priorities are. If you are backpacking first and fishing second or if you are fishing first and backpacking second.
I think the advice you have already been given is great if you are backpacking first. But if your priority is fishing–then I would recommend Hippies by Chota.
http://chotaoutdoorgear.com/shop/hippies-convertible-wading-socks/
I use mine with my regular running/hiking shoes. In size XL they weigh a total of 22 ozs. Mobility is great in them and then when fishing is done, they just peel off and hang on my pack to dry a bit. Just a thought.
Jul 18, 2013 at 12:00 pm #2007391+1 on the chotas love mine
Jul 18, 2013 at 9:33 pm #2007523Do you think the NRS neoprene socks would do dual duty going through cold, wet snowfields as well? Or do you think waterproof Goretex socks might be better? I kind of agree with you, having non-waterproof socks that keep you warm is probably better than waterproof socks when wading in a stream, since you're liable to let water in over the tops.
By the way, which NRS wetsocks do you prefer?
There are the "hydroskins" and just the regular wetsocks. The "hydroskins" are $5 more.
Aug 29, 2013 at 6:12 am #2019759Sep 8, 2013 at 11:53 am #2022989I like the Walmart Croc-off's, which cost less than nine dollars a set and are comfortable, don't absorb water and are light "as a feathah": Size 13: 10.7oz; Size 6: 6.7oz.
I find they're pretty grippy in lakes and streams, and they're thick enough that I can walk over gravel or rocks in the dark without painful surprises…not to mention the advantage of toe coverage. They dry as soon as they're shaken, and are fantastic for late-night treks to the loo, etc…
These are currently "out of season" at Walmart and will not return until last Spring, 2014. They're a standard recommendation on my Gear Lists for Scouts and are universally-loved by those who bring them along on trips. They are bulky in manly feet sizes, so I strap them to the outside of the pack. Of course, with the pack you see in my avatar there, I do have room, ha ha!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.